BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JATP73143, author = {}, title = {A Comparative Analysis of the CRITIC and Entropy Methods for Objective Weighting of Priority Criteria}, journal = {Jurnal Aplikasi Teknologi Pangan}, volume = {16}, number = {2}, year = {2025}, keywords = {Weighting method; CRITIC; Entropy; ARAS; Analysis sensitivity}, abstract = { Various criteria weighting methods are available, and this study aims to compare the Criteria Importance Through Inter Criteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Entropy methods to determine the criteria weights. This case study focuses on identifying priority customers from 2 years of sales transactions in an online retail company, which processes more than 1 million transactions with 8 features. The researcher selected 100 high-value customers as alternative data, prioritizing research efficiency and high-value insights. Four criteria were set for customer prioritization. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method to measure the stability of the method. The CRITIC method produced balanced weights (0.23-0.27), while Entropy produced more variable weights, with C3 being the largest criterion weight with a value of 0.46, indicating its strong dependence on the data distribution. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the Entropy-ARAS method was more sensitive to weight changes (75.11134%) in this customer prioritization case compared to the CRITIC-ARAS method (56.95372%). }, issn = {2460-5921}, pages = {148--161} doi = {10.14710/jmasif.16.2.73143}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jatp/article/view/73143} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Various criteria weighting methods are available, and this study aims to compare the Criteria Importance Through Inter Criteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Entropy methods to determine the criteria weights. This case study focuses on identifying priority customers from 2 years of sales transactions in an online retail company, which processes more than 1 million transactions with 8 features. The researcher selected 100 high-value customers as alternative data, prioritizing research efficiency and high-value insights. Four criteria were set for customer prioritization. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method to measure the stability of the method. The CRITIC method produced balanced weights (0.23-0.27), while Entropy produced more variable weights, with C3 being the largest criterion weight with a value of 0.46, indicating its strong dependence on the data distribution. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the Entropy-ARAS method was more sensitive to weight changes (75.11134%) in this customer prioritization case compared to the CRITIC-ARAS method (56.95372%).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Author dapat secara bebas menggunakan isi dari artikelnya tanpa harus ijin secara khusus kepada redaksi. Author dapat secara bebas menyampaikan artikelnya di kelas, meeting, dan dapat didistribusikan kepada pihak lain selama tidak digunakan untuk kepentingan komersial (sesuai dengan prinsip copyright JATP: CC attribution Non Commercial).
Authors pembaca dapat me-redistribusi material dengan berbagai format akan tetapi harus memberikan credit dan tidak mengubah isi serta tidak digunakan untuk kepentingan komersial.
Jurnal Aplikasi Teknologi Pangan adalah jurnal dengan open access system. Seluruh artikel pada jurnal ini, dapat didownload secara gratis tanpa harus registrasi terlebih dahulu.