Effect of Different Kefir Grain Starter Concentration on Yield, pH, CO2 Content, and Organoleptic Properties of Buffalo Milk Kefir

*Lorentia Lydia Margareth  -  Food Technology Department, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Scinces, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Nurwantoro Nurwantoro  -  Food Technology Department, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Scinces, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Heni Rizqiati  -  Food Technology Department, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Scinces, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Received: 27 Nov 2019; Revised: 26 May 2020; Accepted: 27 May 2020; Published: 27 May 2020; Available online: 1 Jun 2020.
Open Access Copyright 2020 Journal of Applied Food Technology

Citation Format:

This research was investigated the effect of different kefir grain starter concentration on yield, pH, carbon dioxide (CO2) content, and organoleptic properties of buffalo milk kefir, and to investigated the ideal kefir grain concentration for good quality of kefir. Complete randomized design used in this research with 4 treatments and 5 replications in concentration 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10% g/v kefir grain. Buffalo milk, kefir grain, Na2CO3 solution, 1% PP solution, pH meter, burette, and analytical balance were used in this research. The yield and pH of kefir was measured. Carbon dioxide (CO2)  content was measured by Na2CO3 titration, while the organoleptic properties that included level of sourness, sour aroma, texture, and overall acceptance were done by 25 panelists. The results indicated that different kefir grain starter concentration significantly affected to the yield, pH, CO2 content, and organoleptic properties (p<0.05). The most optimal kefir grain concentration was 5% proved by yield 81.81%, pH value 4.20, CO2 content 0.43%, and proper organoleptic properties which were low level of sourness, acceptable aroma of kefir and texture. As conclusion, the concentration of grain relied on the kefir properties that may achieve in the optimum quality of kefir.

Keywords: kefir; buffalo milk; starter concentration.
Funding: Departement of Food Technology, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Science, Diponegoro University

Article Metrics:

  1. Adiluhung, W.D., Sutrisno, A. 2018. Effect of glucomannan concentration and proofing time on the texture and organoleptic characteristics of rice bread (Oryza sativa). Journal of Food and Agro-Industry 6(4):26-37. (In Bahasa Indonesia)
  2. American Public Health Association (APHA). 1978. Standard Method for The Examination of Water and Wastewater. 14thed, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation. Page 1193. Washington DC
  3. Bayu, M.K. 2017. Analysis of total dissolved solids, acidity, fat content, and viscosity level in kefir with different fermentation time. Journal of Food Technology 1(2):33-38. (In Bahasa Indonesia)
  4. Damayanthi, E., Yopi, Hasinah, H., Setyawardani, T., Rizqiati, H., Putra, S. 2014. Characteristic of buffalo river and swamp milk in Northen Sumatera. Indonesian Agricultural Science Journal. 19(2):67-73. (In Bahasa Indonesia)
  5. Hasanah, H., Jannah, A., Fasya, A.G. 2012. The effect of fermentation time on the alcohol content of cassava tape (Manihot utilissima Pohl.). Journal Alchemy 2(1):68-79. DOI: 10.18860/al.v0i0.2294
  6. Kustyawati, M.E., Susilawati, Tobing, D., Trimaryanto. 2012. Profile of fatty acids and amino acids of fresh and fermented goat milk. Journal of Food Technology and Industry 23(1):47-52. (In Bahasa Indonesia)
  7. Laureys, D., Vuyst, L.D. 2014. Microbial species diversity, community dynamics, and metabolite kinetics of water kefir fermentation. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology 80(8): 2564-2572. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03978-13
  8. Lestari, M.W., Bintoro, V.P., Rizqiati, H. 2018. Effects of fermentation time on acidity, viscosity, alcohol content, and hedonic quality of coconut water kefir. Journal of Food Technology 2(1):8-13
  9. Mondang, F.O., Dien, H., Yelnetty, A. 2016. Application of the addition of skim milk concentration to soy milk kefir (Glycine Max). Journal of Food Science and Technology 4(1):9-17. (In Bahasa Indonesia)
  10. Nugroho, P., Dwiloka, B., Rizqiati, H. 2018. Yield, pH value, texture, and antioxidant activity of fresh cheese with acidifying the extract of purple rosella flower (Hubiscus sabdariffa L.). Journal of Food Technology 2(1):33-39
  11. Prastiwi, V.F., Bintoro, V.P., Rizqiati, H. 2018. Microbiological properties, viscosity and organoleptic values of kefir with the addition of high fructose syrup. Journal of Food Technology 2(1): 27-32
  12. Rasbawati, Al-Baarri, A.N., Legowo, A.M., Bintoro, V.P., Dwiloka, B. 2014. Total bacteria and pH of dangke preserved using natural antimicrobial lactoferrin and lactoperoxidase from bovine whey. International Journal of Dairy Science 9(4):116–123. DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2014.116.123
  13. Safitri, M.F., Swarastuti, A. 2013. The quality of kefir is based on the concentration of kefir grain. Journal of Food Technology Applications 2(2):87-92. (In Bahasa Indonesia)
  14. Sawitri, M.E. 2011. Study of concentration kefir grain and shelf life in the refrigerator for the chemical quality of low fat kefir. Animal Sciences Journal 21(1):23-28. (In Bahasa Indonesia)
  15. Tarwendah, I.P. 2017. Comparative study of sensory attributes and brand awareness of food products. Journal of Food and Agro-Industry 5(2):66-73. (In Bahasa Indonesia)
  16. Utami, R., Nurhartadi, E., Nursiwi, E., Andriana, M.A.M., Fitriyaningsih, I. 2017. Fermenting whey cheese using kefir seeds (kefir grains) with a variety of nitrogen sources. Agritech 37(4):377-385. (In Bahasa Indonesia)
  17. Zakaria, Y. 2009. Effect of different types of milk and percentages of starter concentrations on kefir quality. Agripet Journal 9(1):26-30. (In Bahasa Indonesia)

Last update: 2021-04-19 15:13:36

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-04-19 15:13:37

No citation recorded.