JAFT • pISSN 2355-9152 • eISSN 2614-7076 • Member of CrossRef®
skip to main content

Enhancing Steak Taste, Juiciness, Tenderness, and Acceptability through Bromelain-Enzyme Marination: A Sensory-Focused Approach

Fariz Nurmita Aziz scopus  -  Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Jacub Rais, Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java 50275, Indonesia, Indonesia
*Nurul Hasniah  -  Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Jacub Rais, Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java 50275, Indonesia, Indonesia
Ulil Afidah  -  Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Jacub Rais, Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java 50275, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2025 Journal of Applied Food Technology

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of bromelain and papain proteolytic enzymes on the physicochemical and sensory properties of beef steak. Treatments included a control (P0, without proteases, papain marination for 20 minutes (P1) and 30 minutes (P2), and bromelain marination for 10 minutes (P3) and 15 minutes (P4). Parameters measured were moisture content, pH, water activity (aw), water holding capacity (WHC), color (L*, a*, b*), and sensory attributes (aroma, taste, aftertaste, juiciness, tenderness, and overall acceptability). The results showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) in moisture, pH, aw, WHC, or color across treatments. However, significant improvements were observed in sensory attributes except for the aroma. Bromelain treatment, particularly at 15 minutes, resulted in higher scores for tenderness, juiciness, and overall acceptability. Its selective proteolytic action on collagen and elastin enhanced meat texture and moisture retention without excessive protein degradation. Conversely, papain treatment led to some off-flavor development and a softer texture due to its broader proteolytic activity. In conclusion, bromelain proved more effective than papain in improving the sensory quality of beef steak. Marination with bromelain for 10–15 minutes is recommended as a natural tenderization method to enhance consumer acceptance and meat quality.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Beef steak, Bromelain, Meat tenderization, Papain, Sensory evaluation

Article Metrics:

  1. Bhattarai et al. (2021) ‘Effect of proteolytic enzymes (bromelain and papain) on sensory and chemical quality of Sukuti, an indigenous dried meat product of Nepal’, Himalayan Journal of Science and Technology, 5, pp. 8–14
  2. Chaurasiya et al. (2015) ‘Reverse micellar extracted fruit bromelain: A new approach for meat tenderization’, Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(6), pp. 3870–3880. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1449-7
  3. Choi et al. (2012) ‘Effect of bromelain on the quality characteristics of pork loin’, Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 32(4), pp. 452–459. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2012.32.4.452
  4. Choi et al. (2016) ‘Application of bromelain on meat quality characteristics of beef and pork’, Food Science and Biotechnology, 25(5), pp. 1341–1346. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-016-0193-2
  5. Gerelt et al. (2000) ‘Meat tenderization by proteolytic enzymes after osmotic dehydration’, Meat Science, 56(3), pp. 311–318. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00062-4
  6. Gokoglu et al. (2017) ‘Effect of bromelain and papain enzymes addition on physicochemical and textural properties of squid (Loligo vulgaris)’, Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 11(1), pp. 1–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-016-9403-3
  7. Ionescu et al. (2008) ‘Effect of papain and bromelain on muscle and collagen proteins in beef meat’, Scientific Papers: Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 41(1), pp. 451–454
  8. Ketnawa et al. (2011) ‘Application of bromelain extract for muscle foods tenderization’, Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2(5), pp. 393–401. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2011.25056
  9. Lima et al. (2012) ‘Use of plant proteases in meat processing’, Food Chemistry, 134(3), pp. 1231–1235. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.144
  10. Manohar et al. (2016) ‘Application of plant proteases in meat tenderization: Recent trends and future perspectives’, Food Chemistry, 211, pp. 41–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.033
  11. Maqsood, S. et al. (2018) ‘Degradation of Myofibrillar, Sarcoplasmic and Connective Tissue Proteins by Plant Proteolytic Enzymes and Their Impact on Camel Meat Tenderness’, Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55(9), pp. 3427–3438. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3251-6
  12. Mohan et al. (2016) ‘Effect of plant proteases on the quality of meat and meat products’, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 40(6), pp. 1216–1224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12708
  13. Nadzirah et al. (2016) ‘Effect of bromelain on physicochemical properties of beef’, International Food Research Journal, 23(1), pp. 123–129
  14. Radiati and E., L. (2010) ‘Aktivitas enzim bromelin pada berbagai pH dan suhu’, Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Hasil Ternak, 5(2), pp. 60–65
  15. Rawdkuen et al. (2012) ‘Tenderisation of meat by bromelain enzyme extracted from pineapple wastes’, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 25(8), pp. 1147–1154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11447
  16. Razali et al. (2023) ‘Tenderness and physicochemical characteristics of meat treated by recombinant bromelain of MD2 pineapple’, Journal of Food Science and Technology, 60(1), pp. 45–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-022-05456-7
  17. Sakhr, K. and Khatib, S.E. (2019) ‘The Use of Syrian Sumac (Rhus Coriaria) as a Meat Tenderizer: Effect on Fat, Protein and Collagen Profiles on Pectoralis Superficialis Cut’, Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 7(8), pp. 1203–1215. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i8.1203-1215.2629
  18. Santos et al. (2020) ‘Effect of non-recombinant bromelain on meat color parameters’, Meat Science, 162, p. 108029. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.108029
  19. Smith-Marshall et al. (2012) ‘Characterization of bromelain from Morinda citrifolia (Noni) and its effects on protein substrates’, Journal of Food Biochemistry, 36(5), pp. 552–560. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.2011.00565.x
  20. Sunarsih and E. (2008) ‘Pengaruh enzim bromelin terhadap keempukan daging’, Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian, 9(1), pp. 45–50
  21. Truc et al. (2023) ‘Evaluating different levels of papain as texture modifying agent in meat products’, Meat Science, 198, p. 109000. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109000
  22. Ullah, A. et al. (2022) ‘Biogenic Selenium Nanoparticles and Their Anticancer Effects Pertaining to Probiotic Bacteria—A Review’, Antioxidants, 11(10), pp. 1–19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11101916
  23. Utami, D.P., Pudjomartatmo, P. and Nuhriawangsa, A.M.P. (2017) ‘Manfaat Bromelin Dari Ekstrak Buah Nanas (Ananas Comosus L. Merr) Dan Waktu Pemasakan Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Daging Itik Afkir’, Sains Peternakan, 9(2), p. 82. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20961/sainspet.9.2.82-87
  24. Wahyuni and L. (2018) ‘Pengaruh lama marinasi daun pepaya terhadap mutu daging sapi’, Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis, 5(1), pp. 78–84
  25. Wang, Y. and al., et (2020) ‘Influence of proteolytic enzyme treatment on the changes in volatile compounds and odors of beef muscle’, Food Chemistry, 331, p. 127295. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127295
  26. Xu et al. (2020) ‘The mechanistic effect of bromelain and papain on tenderization in jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) muscle’, Food Research International, 131, p. 108991. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.108991
  27. Ye et al. (2021) ‘Effects of bromelain on the quality of smoked salted duck’, Poultry Science, 100(8), p. 101123. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101123

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.