DOI: https://doi.org/10.17728/jaft.31918

Paradoxes at The Heart of Protein Transition

*Leila Mehdizadehtapeh orcid  -  Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Health Sciences Faculty, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye, Turkey
Open Access Copyright 2026 Journal of Applied Food Technology

Citation Format:
Abstract

Research highlights that while alternative proteins hold significant promise for reducing the environmental burden of food systems, their widespread adoption is entangled in a web of structural, nutritional, commercial, and societal paradoxes. The literature collectively points to a fundamental tension: the protein transition is being pursued through substitution rather than reduction, processing rather than simplification, and market expansion rather than systemic reform. This study, therefore, aims to synthesize and rephrase the key evidence across paradoxes at the heart of protein transition through a comprehensive literature survey based on the Fermi Paradox. Overall, the findings suggest that core paradoxes of the protein transition explain why alternative proteins often maintain, rather than disrupt existing systems; but achieving a meaningful and equitable protein transition requires systemic reform that goes beyond ingredient substitution to address overconsumption, processing trade-offs, and governance gaps.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Alternative protein; protein transition; Fermi paradox; paradox; sustainability; nutritional quality
Funding: n/a

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Review Articles
Language : EN
  1. Amato, M., Riverso, R., Palmieri, R., Verneau, F. and La Barbera, F. 2023. Stakeholder Beliefs about Alternative Proteins: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 15(4): 837. DOI: 10.3390/nu15040837
  2. Baum, S. D. 2009. The Sustainability Solution to the Fermi Paradox. https://www.ssrc.org/publications/the-sustainability-solution-to-the-fermi-paradox/#:~:text=No%20present%20observations%20suggest%20a,British%20Interplanetary%20Society (accessed April 18, 2026)
  3. Bio Based Press. 2026. New protein sources will fill the gap. https://www.biobasedpress.eu/2015/02/new-protein-sources-will-fill-the-gap/#:~:text='%20Whereas%20global%20protein%20consumption%20would%20double,to%20dominate%20the%20human%20diet%20by%20mid%2Dcentury (accessed April 16, 2026)
  4. Burrow, D. 2024. Comment: Can Data Help Solve the Food Industry's Plant-Based Paradox? https://www.foodsteps.earth/post/can-data-can-help-solve-plant-based-paradox#:~:text=The%20nuance%20can%20be%20confusing,cholesterol%2C%20and%20increased%20fibre%E2%80%9D (accessed April 16, 2026)
  5. Daou, L., Sayegh, E., Atallah, E., Jabbour Al Maalouf, N. and Sarkis, N. 2025. Greenwashing as a Barrier to Sustainable Marketing: Expectation Disconfirmation, Confusion, and Brand–Consumer Relationships. Sustainability 17(22): 9979. DOI: 10.3390/su17229979
  6. De Castro Carvalho, G., De Deus Souza Carneiro, J., Rocha, R. a. R. and Pereira, E. 2025. Plant-based trends: consumer’s perception and factors that influence the purchase of plant-based products. British Food Journal 127(9): 3396–3426. DOI: 10.1108/bfj-08-2024-0830
  7. DeVito, C. L. 2019. On the Meaning of Fermi’s paradox. Futures 106: 21–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2017.12.002
  8. Dickson, E. and Clay, N. 2024. “Eat up. Save Earth.” Alternative proteins and the myth of inevitable sustainability. Journal of Rural Studies 112: 103447. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103447
  9. Duluins, O., Riera, A., Schuster, M., Baret, P. V. and Van Den Broeck, G. 2022. Economic implications of a protein transition: evidence from Walloon Beef and Dairy farms. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 6: 1-13. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.803872
  10. Duluins, O. and Baret, P. V. 2024a. The paradoxes of the protein transition maintain existing animal production and consumption systems. Nature Food 5(9): 725–730. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-01036-4
  11. Duluins, O. and Baret, P. V. 2024b. A systematic review of the definitions, narratives and paths forwards for a protein transition in high-income countries. Nature Food 5: 28–36. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00906-7
  12. Duque-Estrada, P. and Petersen, I. L. 2023. The sustainability paradox of processing plant proteins. Npj Science of Food 7(1): 38. DOI: 10.1038/s41538-023-00214-1
  13. FAO. 2018. The Politics of Protein—Examining Claims About Livestock, Fish, ‘Alternative Proteins’ and Sustainability. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1656580/ (accessed June 26, 2026)
  14. Guthman, J., Butler, M., Martin, S. J., Mather, C. and Biltekoff, C. 2022. In the name of protein. Nature Food 3(6): 391–393. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-022-00532-9
  15. Hertzler, S. R., Lieblein-Boff, J. C., Weiler, M. and Allgeier, C. 2020. Plant Proteins: Assessing Their Nutritional Quality and Effects on Health and Physical Function. Nutrients 12(12): 3704. DOI: 10.3390/nu12123704
  16. Kashyap, S., Varkey, A., Shivakumar, N., Devi, S., Reddy B H, R., Thomas, T., Preston, T., Sreeman, S. and Kurpad, A. V. (2019). True ileal digestibility of legumes determined by dual-isotope tracer method in Indian adults. The American journal of clinical nutrition 110(4), 873–882. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqz159
  17. Kaur, S. P., Sagar, N. A. and Rani, N. 2025. Alternative proteins: innovations in sources, processing, and consumption. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 9: 1-14. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1641712
  18. Leclerc, R. 2019. Why technology could make animals obsolete. https://agfundernews.com/why-technology-could-make-animals-obsolete (accessed April 16, 2026)
  19. Matthews, J. J., Arentson-Lantz, E. J., Moughan, P. J., Wolfe, R. R., Ferrando, A. A. and Church, D. D. 2025. Understanding dietary protein quality: digestible indispensable amino acid scores and beyond. Journal of Nutrition 155(10): 3152–3167. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.07.005
  20. Mehdizadehtapeh, L., Tekiner, I. H., Gökşen, G., Ajal, E. A., Yılmazer, Y., Bajoub, A., Bostancı, F. and Ennahli, S. 2026. Safety-relevant contaminants and nutritional quality of hazelnut skin and pumpkin seed proteins. Journal of the science of food and agriculture 106(5): 2786–2799. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.70391
  21. Miller, G. F. 2007. Runaway consumerism explains the Fermi paradox. In Brockman, J. (Ed.), What is your dangerous idea? P: 240-243. New York: Harper Perennial
  22. Miller, G. 2023. Runaway consumerism explains the Fermi Paradox. https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11475#:~:text=We%20don't%20seek%20reproductive,messaging%2C%20Ecstasy%2C%20BC%20Bud (accessed April 18, 2026)
  23. Morawicki, R. O., and Díaz González, D. J. 2018. Food Sustainability in the Context of Human Behavior. The Yale journal of biology and medicine 91(2): 191–196
  24. Morgan, P. T., Carson, B. P. and Witard, O. C. 2024. Dietary protein considerations in a sustainable and ageing world: a narrative review with a focus on greenhouse gas emissions and skeletal muscle remodelling and maintenance. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 25: 1030. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07945-6
  25. Mullan, B., and Haqq-Misra, J. 2019. Population growth, energy use, and the implications for the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Futures 106: 4–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.009
  26. Rahman, M. M., de Silva, A., Sassa, M., Islam, M. R., Aktar, S. and Akter, S. 2023. A systematic analysis and future projections of the nutritional status and interpretation of its drivers among school-aged children in South-East Asian countries. The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia 16: 100244. DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100244
  27. StrategicAllies. 2026. The Protein Paradox – how much is too much and where should it come from? https://strategicallies.co.uk/article/the-protein-paradox-how-much-is-too-much-and-where-should-it-come-from/ (accessed April 16, 2026)
  28. Teh, W. 2023. Alternative Proteins – The Big Food Fuss. https://greenarccapital.com/alternative-proteins-the-big-food-fuss/#:~:text=Price%20remains%20a%20significant%20challenge%20for%20the,animal%2Dbased%20proteins%20are%20superior%20across%20multiple%20attributes (accessed April 16, 2026)
  29. Tekiner, İ.H. 2020. Food and nutrition trends: Eternal life or our extinction? Global Journal of Nutrition & Food Science 2(5): 1-2. DOI: 10.33552/GJNFS.2019.02.000544
  30. Tekiner, İ. H., Bogueva, D., Mehdizadehtapeh, L. 2023. Nutrition marketing and public policy. In: Ghosh, D., Bogueva, D. & Smarta, R. B. (Eds.), Nutrition science, Marketing nutrition, Health Claims and Public Policy. p: 297-303. Elsevier USA
  31. UN Decade of Action on Nutrition. 2016. What is the UN Decade of Action on Nutrition?. https://www.un.org/nutrition/about (accessed June 26, 2026)
  32. Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., Jonell, M., Clark, M., Gordon, L. J., Fanzo, J., Hawkes, C., Zurayk, R., Rivera, J. A., De Vries, W., Majele Sibanda, L., Afshin, A., … and Murray, C. J. L. 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet (London, England) 393(10170): 447–492. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4
  33. Wood, A., Stanley, K. C., Daly, J., Grieger, K., Aimutis, W. R., Shirwaiker, R. A., and Wilson, N. L. W. 2026. Trends, challenges, and opportunities for the United States alternative meat and seafood sector: stakeholder-informed perspectives. Npj Science of Food 10: 133. DOI: 10.1038/s41538-026-00841-4
  34. Xiao, X., Zou, P. R., Hu, F., Zhu, W. and Wei, Z. J. 2023. Updates on Plant-Based Protein Products as an Alternative to Animal Protein: Technology, Properties, and Their Health Benefits. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 28(10): 4016. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28104016
  35. Zenasni, W., Tekiner, I. H., Abdelmoumen, H., Nejjari, R., Chergui, A., Ennahli, S. and Ajal, E. A. 2026. Comparative Characterization of Pumpkin Seed Protein Isolates Obtained by Alkaline, Ultrasound-Assisted, and Microwave-Assisted Extraction: Functionality, Particle Size, and Structural Integrity. Processes 14(8): 1250. DOI: 10.3390/pr14081250

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.