DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpii.2024.24263

Sistem Monitoring dan Evaluasi Proses Belajar Mengajar Berbasis Outcome Based Education di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro

*Naniek Utami Handayani  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH, Kampus UNDIP Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Noer Abyor Handayani  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH, Kampus UNDIP Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Sulardjaka Sulardjaka  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH, Kampus UNDIP Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Received: 2 May 2024; Revised: 29 May 2024; Accepted: 5 Jun 2024; Available online: 9 Jun 2024; Published: 26 Aug 2024.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Kurikulum OBE merupakan salah satu indikator dalam penilaian akreditasi Program Studi (Prodi) baik akreditasi nasional maupun internasional. Pelaksanaan kurikulum OBE pada Perguruan Tinggi melibatkan perancangan kurikulum, proses belajar mengajar dengan pendekatan student centered learning, dan penilaian capaian pembelajaran. Monitoring dan evaluasi dalam konteks Outcome-Based Education (OBE) memiliki tujuan untuk memastikan efektivitas implementasi sistem pendidikan. Selain itu, juga untuk menilai sejauh mana tujuan pembelajaran yang telah ditetapkan berhasil dicapai; melibatkan penilaian metode pengajaran, keberhasilan strategi pembelajaran, dan penggunaan sumber daya pembelajaran; memberikan umpan balik yang berharga untuk melakukan perbaikan terhadap proses pembelajaran; memastikan konsistensi dalam penerapan kurikulum; membantu menilai kualitas instrumen penilaian, keadilan dalam penilaian, dan sejauh mana penilaian mencerminkan pencapaian tujuan pembelajaran; membantu mengukur sejauh mana siswa terlibat dalam pembelajaran dan apakah metode pengajaran mendorong keterlibatan aktif mahasiswa.

 

Kata kunci: sistem, monitoring dan evaluasi, outcome based education, indikator, rubrik penilaian

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Laporan Studi Kasus
Language : ID
Recent articles
Penerapan Value Stream Mapping (VSM) untuk Menurunkan Lead Time Process dan Meningkatkan Kinerja Aktivitas Pengadaan di Site Tambang Kajian Potensi Timbulan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun (B3) pada Balai Pengujian dan Peralatan (BP2) Provinsi Jawa Tengah Pengaruh Pelepasan Wave Trap terhadap Operasi Sistem Transmisi Sistem Monitoring dan Evaluasi Proses Belajar Mengajar Berbasis Outcome Based Education di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Diponegoro Analisis Penambahan Item Pekerjaan Guna Efisiensi Waktu pada Proyek Penyambungan Listrik Rusun KITB Minimalisasi Segregasi dalam Pekerjaan Penghamparan Material Lapis Pondasi Atas Terhadap Produktivitas Alat Berat Pada KM. 13 Proyek Rekonstruksi dan Pelebaran Jalan Semarang-Demak-Trengguli-Jepara/Kudus Kajian Peranan dan Penerapan Kode Etik Profesi Keinsinyuran dalam Praktik Pekerjaan Bidang Sipil dan Lingkungan di Indonesia untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi dan Perlindungan Keselamatan Kerja More recent articles
  1. Akhmadeva, L., Hindy, M., & Sparrey, C. J. (2013). Overcoming Obstacles to Implementing An Outcome-Based Education Model: Traditional Versus Transformational OBE. Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 1–29
  2. Alley-Johnson, E. (1993). Teachers’ Perceptions of the Effects of Implementation of Outcome-Based Education-A Qualitative Analysis. 245
  3. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman
  4. AUN-QA. (2015). Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Programme Level Version 3.0. Bangkok: ASEAN University Network
  5. Bin, J. O. (2015, Desember 24). Living Better. (AUN- QA Network) Retrieved Maret 2016, 2016, from http://livingbetterforhappiness.blogspot.co.id/2015/12/the-ten-principles-behind-aun-qa-model.html
  6. Bloom, B. S. (1984). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain 2nd edition Edition. Boston: Addison Wesley Publishing Company
  7. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  10. Cuban, L. (2000). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Schools as Collaborative Cultures: Creating the Future Now, 71–77
  11. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage Publications
  12. Handayani, N.U., & Wibowo, M.A., (2021). Implementation Strategy of Outcome-Based Education: A Case Study in Engineering Faculty Diponegoro University. Proceedings of the Second Asia Pacific International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Surakarta, Indonesia, September 14-16
  13. Harden, R. M. (1999). AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome- based education: Part 1-An introduction to outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 7–14
  14. Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education: the future is today. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 625–629
  15. Hoffman, T. G. (1996). An examination of outcome- based education practices, standards, and factors that enhance implementation of OBE
  16. Junaedi, A., dkk. (2020). Buku panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0 untuk mendukung merdeka belajar-kampus Merdeka. Edisi ke-4. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
  17. Killen, R. (2003). Validity in outcomes-based assessment. Perspectives in Education, 21(1), 1–14
  18. Maree, J. G., & Fraser, W. J. (2004). Outcomes-based assessment. Sandown: Heinemann
  19. Ornstein, A.C. and Hunkins, F.P. (2014). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues. Pearson Education Ltd. Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex CM20 2 JE, England. Printed and bound in Vivar, Malaysia. ISBN13:978- 1-978-292-16207-2
  20. Rada, M. (2017, January 2). Industry 5.0 Definition. Retrieved from Medium: https://medium.com/@michael.rada/industry-5-0-definition6a2f9922dc48
  21. Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators, 1801 North Moore Street, Arlington
  22. Yusof, R., Othman, N., Norwani, N. M., Ahmad, N. L. B., & Jalil, N. B. A. (2017). Implementation Of Outcome Based Education (OBE) in Accounting Programme in Higher Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 1186–1200. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i6/3352

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.