The role of agency theory in the relationship between foreign ownership and performance-risk of stock in Indonesia: is one or two-way interaction?

*Ahmad Maulin Naufa  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
I Wayan Nuka Lantara scopus  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Received: 5 Nov 2018; Published: 30 Dec 2018.
Open Access Copyright 2018 Diponegoro International Journal of Business

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: EN
Full Text:
Statistics: 182 185


Using agency theory as a theoretical basis, this paper aims to examine the relationship between foreign ownership, performance, and risk. Particularly, we examine whether the foreign ownership can improve or reduce the performance and risk. Vice versa, it also examine whether performance and risk may also influence the foreign ownership of stock. We utilized samples from the 100 Kompas Index from the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX), and we obtained 87 stocks from 2011-2017. We analyzed the relationship using ordinary least square by EViews 10.0. The result shows that the foreign ownership contributes positively to the improvement of performance, although the performance does not affect significantly to foreign ownership. Then, the relationship between the foreign ownership and the risk are not significant. The relationship the risk to the foreign is also not significant. To commence with, the foreign has an essential role in the improvement of Indonesian stock performance.

foreign ownership; stock; Indonesia; performance; risk

Article Metrics:

  1. Aebi, V., G. Sebato., and M. Schmid. 2011. Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance. Journal of Banking and Finance. Vol. 36. 3213-3226.
  2. Agarwall, S., S. Farcloth., C. Liu., and S.G. Rhee. 2009. Why do foreign investor underperform domestic investor in trading activities? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Market. Vol 12. 32-53.
  3. Alin, N. L. 2011. Foreign investment influence on ownership and control in Japanese firms. Working Paper. Faculty of Business. University Cluj-Napoca, Japan. 610-615.
  4. Ang, J., R. Cole., and D. Lawson. 2010. The role of owner in capital structure decisions: an analysis of single owner corporations. The Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance. 14: 1-36.
  5. Arfaoui, M., and A. B. Rejeb. 2015. Return dynamics and volatility spillovers between forex and stock market in Mena countries: What to remember for portfolio choice. International Journal of Management and Economics. Vol. 46. 72-100. 082331691944
  6. Azar, S. A. 2010. Value at risk models of the US stock market for US and foreign investors. International Review of Applied Financial Issues and Economics. Vol. 2. 665-686.
  7. Bachrach, B., and D. Galai. 1979. The risk return relationship and stock prices. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Vol. 14. 421-441.
  8. Becht, M., Bolton, P., Roell, A., 2003. Corporate governance and control. In: Constantinides, G. M., Harris, M., Stulz, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Vol. 21 of Handbooks in Economics. Elsevier, Ch. 1, pp. 1–109.
  9. Bekaert, G., and C. Harvey. 1997. Emerging equity market volatility. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 43. 29–78.
  10. Chaganti, R., and F. Damanpour. 1991. Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal. 12: 479-491.
  11. Chen, Z., J. Du., D. Li., and R. Ouyang. 2011. Does foreign institutional ownership increase return volatility? Evidence from China. Journal of Banking and Finance. Vol. 37. 660-669.
  12. De Santis, G., and S. Imrohoroglu. 1994. Stock return and volatility in emerging financial markets. Discussion Paper No. 93. University of Southern California.
  13. Di Maggio, J. P., and W. W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Instituional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review. 48: 147-160.
  14. Doidge, C., G. A. Karolyi., and R. M. Stulz. 2004. Why are foreign firms that list in the U.S. worth more? Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 71. 205–238.
  15. Elliot, R. J. R., and Y. Zhou. 2015. Co-location and spatial wage spillovers in China: the role of foreign ownership and trade. WorldDev. Vol. 66. 629-644.
  16. Fama, E., 1970. Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.Journal of Finance. 25(2)
  17. Fama, E., and M.C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics. 26.
  18. Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 33. 401-425.
  19. Fuentelsaz, L., J. Gomez., E. Martinez., and Y. Polo. 2000. Remuneration policies in the marketing area: Behavioural vs performance measures.Journal of Marketing Management. 16: 937-957.
  20. Galais, D. and R.W. Masulis. 1976. The Option Pricing Model and the Risk Factor of Stock. Journal of Financial Economics. 1(2): 53-82.
  21. Gomes, B. C. 1989. Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 11: 1-25.
  22. Grinbalt, M., and M. Keloharju. (2000). The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: A study of Finland’s unique data set. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 55. 43-67.
  23. Hennart, J. F. 1988. A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal. 9: 361-374.
  24. Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3: 305-360.
  25. Jensen, M. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 323-329.
  26. Jiang, L., and J. B. Kim. 2004. Foreign equity ownership and information assymetry: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting. Vol. 15.184-213.
  27. Jin, L., and S. C. Myers. 2006. R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 79. 257-292.
  28. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1973. On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review. 80 (4): 237-251.
  29. Khamis, R., A. M. Hamdan., and W. Elali. 2015. The relationship between ownership structure dimensions and corporate performance: Evidence from Bahrain. Australian Accounting Business and Finance Journal. 9(4): 38-56
  30. Kim, E. H., and V. Singal. 2000. Stock market openings: Experience of emerging economies. Journal of Business. Vol. 7. 25-66.
  31. Kurniawati, I., and P. T. Komalasari. 2014. Pengaruh kepemilikan negara dan asing terhadap corporate risk taking. Jurnal Manajemen Teori dan Terapan. 2: 100-115.
  32. Kwon, T. H., S. C. Bae., and J. C. Chung. 2005. Do foreign investors price foreign exchange risk differently. The Journal of Financial Research. Vol. 28. 555-573.
  33. Li, D., Q. N. Nguyen., P.K. Pham., and S. X. Wei. 2011. Large foreign ownership and firm level stock return volatility in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Vol. 46. pp. 1123-1155.
  34. Liu, W. C., and C. M. Hsu. 2014. Profit performance of financial holding companies: Evidence from Taiwan. Emerging Markets Finance. 50: 190-200.
  35. Mamatzakis, E., A. N. Kalyvas., and J. Piesse. 2013. Does regulation in credit, labour, and business matter for bank performance in the EU-10 economies? International Journal of The Economics and Business. 20: 341-385.
  36. Merton, R. C. 1987. A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance. Vol. 42. 483–510.
  37. Modigliani, F., and M, Miller. 1958. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment”, American Economic Review, Vol. 48, pp. 655-669.
  38. Mintzberg, H. 1978. Patterns in strategy formation. Manage Science. 24 (9): 934–948.
  39. Olcott, G. 2009. Conflict and Change: Foreign Ownership and The Japanese Firm. Cambridge University Press. UK.
  40. Pambudi, D. and R. Smyth. 2009. Making Indonesia more attractive to foreign investors: A computable general equilibrium analysis of reducing the premium in Central Java. RURDS. Vol 20: 226-240.
  41. Phung, D. N., and A. V. Mishra. 2015. Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms. Australian Economic Papers. 63-98.
  42. Ricci, L. A., and F. Trionfetti. 2012. Productivity, networks, and export performance: Evidence from a cross-country firm Dataset. Review of International Economics. 20(3): 532-562.
  43. Schwert, G. W. 1989. Why does stock market volatility change over time? The Journal of Finance. Vol. 24. No. 5. 1115-1153.
  44. Shapiro, I. 2006. Extending the Framework of Inquiry: Theories of Change in Conflict. Berghof Handbook, (5).
  45. Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance. 42: 737-783.
  46. Thomsen, S. and Pedersen, T. 2000, ‘Ownership Structure and Economic Performance in the Largest European Companies’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, pp. 689–705.
  47. Utama, C. A., and H. Musa. 2011. The causality between corporate governance practice and bank performance: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Gadjah mada International Journal of Business. 13: 227-247.
  48. Vo, X. V. 2015. Foreign ownership and stock return volatility-evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Financial Management. Vol. 30. 101-109.
  49. Wang, J. 2007. Foreign ownership and volatility dynamics of Indonesia stocks. Asia Pacific Financial Markets. Vol. 14. 201-210.
  50. Williamson, O. E. 1981. The economics of organizations: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology. 87: 548-577.