Does managerial bias pose destructive impact on company? A non-linear relationship between CEO’s overconfidence and company value

Bayu Wiratama; Kris Brantas Abiprayu; Siti Ridloah

doi:10.14710/dijb.1.2.2018.105-111

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dijb.1.2.2018.105-111

Does managerial bias pose destructive impact on company? A non-linear relationship between CEO’s overconfidence and company value

Bayu Wiratama , Kris Brantas Abiprayu, Siti Ridloah

Management Department, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Citation Format:

Abstract

This research aims at testing the influence of CEO’s Overconfidence (KDB) on the values of companies registered with the Indonesian Stock Exchange in the period 2007-2015. KDB is a bias inherent in individual, particularly corporate CEO resulted from his/her great authority. A CEO with KDB will assume that his/her company has investment opportunities in the future and, thus, reduce dividend in anticipation of acquiring an investment opportunity in the future. Some opinions argue that KDB’s benefit will be maximal when the confidence is at moderate level. A manager is deemed able to contribute to his/her company, have a good innovation level, have optimal motivation level, and present lower level of cost of debt or capital and optimal amount and rate of investment return. Too low or too high KDB is deemed only to pose negative impact on company value as resulted from non-optimal degree of leverage and investment.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: overconfidence (KDB); CEO; investment; company value

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 1, No 2 (2018)

Recent articles

Back matter Front matter Organizational climate, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and employee performance Does managerial bias pose destructive impact on company? A non-linear relationship between CEO’s overconfidence and company value The role of agency theory in the relationship between foreign ownership and performance-risk of stock in Indonesia: is one or two-way interaction? More recent articles

Allen, F., and Michaely, R.(2003). Payout policy. In: Constantinides, G.M., Harris, M., Stultz, R.M. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Vol. 1. Elsevier, 337–429 (Chapter 7)
Baker, M., Ruback, R. S., and Wurgler, J. (2004). Behavioral corporate finance: A survey. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research
Ben-David, I., Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R. (2007). Managerial Overconﬁdence and Corporate Policies. Working Paper. Duke University
Black, B. (2001). The corporate governance behaviour and market value of Rusian firms. Emerging Market Review, Vol. 2, 89-108
Campbell, T.C., Gallmeyer, M., Johnson, S.A., Rutherford, J., and Stanley, B.W. (2011). CEOoverconﬁdence and forced turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 101, 695-712
Clarke, D., (2003). Corporate governance in China: An overview. China Econ. Rev, Vol. 14. 494-507
DeFinetti, B. (1962). Does it make sense to speak of good probability appraiser? In I. J. Good (Ed.), The scientist speculates: An anthology of partly-baked ideas. London: Basic Books Inc
DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, 147-160
Fairchild, R. L. (2009). Managerial overconfidence, moral hazard problems, and excessive life-cycle debt sensitivity. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Vol 6 (3)
Finkelstein, S., and Boyd, B., 1998. How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, 179-199
Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick, D. (1990). Top management team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 484-503
Gervais, S, Heaton, J.B and Odean, T. (2003). Overconfidence, investment policy, and executive stock option. Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working paper
Gervais, S and Goldstein, I.(2004). Overconfidence and team coordination. Working paper, Duke University
Goel, A.M., and Thakor, A.V. (2008). Overconﬁdence, CEO selection, and corporate governance. Journal of Finance, Vol. 63, 2737–2784
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., danKleinbolting, H.(1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506-528
Hackbarth, D.(2008). Managerial traits and capital structure decisions. Journal of Financial Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 43, 843–881
Haleblian, J., and Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of enviromental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Mangement Journal, Vol. 36, 844-863
Hambrick, D., and Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational behaviour, Vol. 9,, 369-406
Hambrick, D., and Mason, P. (1984). Upper ecchelon: The organization as reflection of its top manager. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, 193-206
Hammond, J.S., Keeney, R.L., and Raiffa, H. (2006). The hidden traps in decision making. Harvard Business Review, Vol 84 (1), 120-126
Hannan, M., and Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organization. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 82, 929-964
Heaton, J.B. (2002). Managerial optimism and corporate finance. Financial Management, Vol. 31, 33-45
Hirshleifer, D. (2001). Investor psychology and asset pricing. Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, 1533–1597
Hoetker, G. (2007). The use of logit and probit model in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, 331-343
Huang, W., Jiang, F., Liu, Z., and Zhang, M. (2011). Agency cost, top executives’ overconfidence, and investment-cash flow sensitivity – Evidence from listed company in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 19, 261-277
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovicdan A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristic and biases, (201-208). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Kruger, J., and Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 77, 1121-1134
Langer, E.J. (1975). The ilussion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 32, 311-328
Li, J.T., and Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China. Academy Management Journal, Vol 53 (1):45-69
Lin, Y., Hu, S., and Chen, M. (2008). Testing pecking order prediction from the viewpoint of managerial optimism: Some empirical evidence from Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 16, 160-181
Lioukas, S., Bourantas, D., and Papadakis, V. (1993). Managerial autonomy of state-owned enterprises: Determining factors. Organization Science, Vol. 4, 645-666
Malmendier, U., and Tate, G. (2005). CEOoverconﬁdence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, 2661–2700
Malmendier, U., and Tate, G. (2005). Do overconfidence affects corporate invesment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited. European Financial Management, Vol. 11, No. 5: 649-659
Malmendier, U., and Tate, G. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEOoverconﬁdence and the market’s reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 89, 20–43
Malmendier, U., Tate, G., and Yan, J. (2011). Overconﬁdence and early-life experiences: the effect of managerial traits on corporate ﬁnancial policies. Journal of Finance, Vol. 66, 168–173
Moore, D.A., and Kim, T.G. (2003). Myopic social prediction and the solo comparison effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 85 (6), 1121-1135
Richardson, S. (2006). Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 11, 159-189
Schrand, C.M., and Zechman, S.L.C. (2012). Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial missreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 53, 311-329
Shefrin, H. M. (2001). Behavioral corporate finance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol 14 (3)
Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?.ActaPsychologica, Vol. 47, 143-148
Tsui, A. (2007). From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the academy and beyond. Acedemy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, 1353-1364.
Weinstein, N.D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 39, 806-820
Wu, C.H., and Liu, V.W. (2011). Payout policy and CEOoverconﬁdence. Working Paper. National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Author(s) Rights

In order for Diponegoro International Journal of Business (DIJB) to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from author(s) to publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the author(s) and DIJB. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to DIJB, while authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. DIJB supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.

As an author, you have rights to a large range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in DIJB has wide rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:

use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
use for internal training by the author's company;
distribution to colleagues for their research use;
use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article);
voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes,

(but it should follow the open-access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).

Authors/readers/third parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors detail information), a copyright notice, an open-access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material) and provide a link to the license.

Authors/readers/third parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, re-use portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).

Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (Publishing Right)

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to the Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Diponegoro as the publisher of DIJB.

Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP)'. An e-mail will be sent to the Corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a CTAP form by the online version of this agreement.

DIJB, the publisher, and the editorial board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in DIJB are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

Remember, even though we ask for a transfer of copyright for publishing (CTAP), our journal Author(s) retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights as mentioned before.

The Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form can be downloaded here