PERILAKU PERJALANAN PENGGUNA SEPEDA MOTOR UNTUK TUJUAN BEKERJA DI PUSAT KOTA SEMARANG (STUDI KASUS: KORIDOR SEGITIGA EMAS)

*Jonathan Suek -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Okto Risdianto Manullang -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Received: 10 Nov 2017; Published: 15 Mar 2019.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: ID
Full Text:
Statistics: 127 36
Abstract
Working activity is one of the subsistence activities with the highest motivation level to travel. In Semarang City, the workplace is still dominant (75.04%) located in the city center, so the city center has a great attraction. It makes the provision of public transportation, such as Trans Semarang has a high service area in the city center. Currently, the Segitiga Emas Corridor has been serviced by 5 bus lines, but workers are still using motorcycles. In city scale, the dependency of motorcycle use reached 79.58% in Semarang City. On the other hand, the value of Trans Semarang loading factor is only 54%. This phenomenon is suspected to occur because of public transport services that have not been in accordance with the user’s travel behavior. Travel behavior can be measured through travel patterns that are formed by scheduling daily activities. Decisions in determining travel patterns are inseparable from the socio-demographic, economic and residential aspects. This study aims to understand the relationship between the travel patterns of workers with these aspects, as well as analyzing predictor variables on understanding the provision of urban mass transportation. The research method used is quantitative approach by using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis through structural equation model (SEM). The results showed that unmarried workers and workers who do not have children or already do not have children at school age are potential workers who can switch modes to Trans Semarang (49,5%). Therefore, married workers with dual-earners in households, have 1-2 school-age children and small households tend to travel complex and difficult to facilitate by Trans Semarang service. Thus, transport services should be tailored to the characteristics and needs of workers, at least for potential demand to attract new users
Keywords
travel behavior, work activity, motorscycle

Article Metrics:

  1. Bertolini, L., le Clercq, F., & Kapoen, L. (2005). Sustainable Accessibility: A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward. Transport Policy, 12(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.006
  2. BPS. (2016). Kota Semarang dalam Angka 2016. Katalog 1102001.3374 (Vol. 3). Kota Semarang.
  3. Douglas, G. B., Evans, J. E. J., & Quade, P. B. (n.d.). Urban Design , Urban Form , And Employee Travel Behavior, 298–306.
  4. Handy, S. (2002). Accessibility- vs. Mobility-Enhancing Strategies For Addressing Automobile Dependence in The U.S. Davis, CA. Retrieved from http://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/handy/ECMT_report.pdf
  5. Hasibuan, H. S., Soemardi, T. P., Koestoer, R., & Moersidik, S. (2014). The Role of Transit Oriented Development in constructing urban environment sustainability, the case of Jabodetabek, Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.075
  6. Ma, J., Mitchell, G., & Heppenstall, A. (2014). Daily travel behaviour in Beijing, China: An analysis of workers’ trip chains, and the role of socio-demographics and urban form. Habitat International, 43, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.008
  7. Maat, K. (2009). Built Environment and Car Travel: Analyses of Interdependencies. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV.
  8. Manoj, M., & Verma, A. (2013). Trip-Chaining Behaviour of Workers From a City of A Developing Country, 1–18.
  9. Solimun. (2002). Multivariate Analysis Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Lisrel dan Amos. FMIPA Universitas Brawijaya.
  10. Susantono, B. (2014). Revolusi Transportasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  11. Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2007). Explaining travel behavior: Towards a new conceptual framework and modeling technique. In Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Transport Research. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-387702
  12. Vilhelmson, B. (1999). Daily mobility and the use of time for different activities . The case of Sweden, 48(3), 177–185.
  13. Yang, M., Wang, W., Chen, X., Wan, T., & Xu, R. (2007). Empirical Analysis of Commute Trip Chaining: Case Study of Shangyu, China. Transportation Research Record, 2038(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.3141/2038-18
  14. Ye, X., Pendyala, R. M., & Gottardi, G. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2006.03.004