BibTex Citation Data :
@article{LDJR20337, author = {Nur Jani}, title = {Analisis Yuridis Rekomendasi Bawaslu Tentang Diskualifikasi Petahana (Studi Kasus Pilkada Kabupaten Tasikmalaya Tahun 2020)}, journal = {Law, Development and Justice Review}, volume = {6}, number = {3}, year = {2023}, keywords = {Bawaslu; Disqualification; Incumbent.}, abstract = { This research was motivated by the polemic on the recommendation of the General Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) of Tasikmalaya Regency regarding the disqualification of incumbent Tasikmalaya Regent Candidates who allegedly took advantage of government programs during the 2020 Tasikmalaya Regency Regional Head Election (Pilkada). Meanwhile, the General Election Commission (KPU), which did not implement the recommendations, was decided to have acted according to its authority. Demonstrations were rife everywhere which raised the precariousness of the Pilkada at that time. So, the author's research object is the disqualification recommendation documents which are formally and materially reviewed according to Law Number 10 of 2016 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents, Mayors with qualitative research of the type of retrospective case studies collecting recommendation documents disqualified from Bawaslu, KPU, DKPP, sources of legislation, interviews and the mass media. The results showed that the recommendation for disqualification violated authority in terms of time (onbevoegdheid ratione temporis), so that the Bawaslu was considered unprofessional. }, issn = {2655-1942}, pages = {200--218} doi = {10.14710/ldjr.6.2023.200-218}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/lj/article/view/20337} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This research was motivated by the polemic on the recommendation of the General Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) of Tasikmalaya Regency regarding the disqualification of incumbent Tasikmalaya Regent Candidates who allegedly took advantage of government programs during the 2020 Tasikmalaya Regency Regional Head Election (Pilkada). Meanwhile, the General Election Commission (KPU), which did not implement the recommendations, was decided to have acted according to its authority. Demonstrations were rife everywhere which raised the precariousness of the Pilkada at that time. So, the author's research object is the disqualification recommendation documents which are formally and materially reviewed according to Law Number 10 of 2016 concerning the Election of Governors, Regents, Mayors with qualitative research of the type of retrospective case studies collecting recommendation documents disqualified from Bawaslu, KPU, DKPP, sources of legislation, interviews and the mass media. The results showed that the recommendation for disqualification violated authority in terms of time (onbevoegdheid ratione temporis), so that the Bawaslu was considered unprofessional.
Note: This article has supplementary file(s).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
(Penulis yang mengirimkan naskah melakukannya dengan pengertian bahwa jika diterima untuk publikasi, hak cipta artikel tersebut akan diberikan kepada LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro sebagai penerbit jurnal. Hak cipta mencakup hak untuk mereproduksi dan mengirimkan artikel dalam semua bentuk dan media, termasuk cetak ulang, foto, mikrofilm, dan reproduksi serupa lainnya, serta terjemahannya. LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro dan Editor berusaha keras untuk memastikan bahwa tidak ada data, pendapat, atau pernyataan yang salah atau menyesatkan dipublikasikan di jurnal. Dengan cara apa pun, isi artikel dan iklan yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal MMH adalah tanggung jawab masing-masing penulis dan pengiklan.)
Diterbitkan Oleh:
Diponegoro Law Firm, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro Bekerjasama dengan DPC PERADI Semarang.
DLF, Gedung PKM Lt. 1. Jl. A. Suroyo, Gd Prof. Purwahid Patrik, Tembalang-Semarang
Email: diponegorolawfirm@live.undip.ac.id Telp. 024-76918201 Fax. 024-76918206 View My Stats