Analisis Yuridis Komparasi Penyelesaian Kepailitan Transnasional di Singapura dan Malaysia dengan Penyelesaian di Indonesia

Angreina Larose Sihotang; Siti Mahmudah; Aisyah Ayu Musyafa; Mira Novana Ardani

doi:10.14710/ldjr.6.2023.276-291

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.6.2023.276-291

Analisis Yuridis Komparasi Penyelesaian Kepailitan Transnasional di Singapura dan Malaysia dengan Penyelesaian di Indonesia

*Angreina Larose Sihotang - Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Siti Mahmudah - Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Aisyah Ayu Musyafa - Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Mira Novana Ardani - Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{LDJR20498,
    author = {Angreina Sihotang and Siti Mahmudah and Aisyah Musyafa and Mira Ardani},
    title = {Analisis Yuridis Komparasi Penyelesaian Kepailitan Transnasional di Singapura dan Malaysia dengan Penyelesaian di Indonesia},
    journal = {Law,  Development and Justice Review},
  volume = {6},
    number = {3},
    year = {2023},
    keywords = {Comparative Juridical, Bankruptcy Resolution in Indonesia, Transnational Bankruptcy, Transnational Bankruptcy in ASEAN.},
    abstract = {  Transnational bankruptcy resolution is still a legal problem in ASEAN. This problem arises because there is no harmonization of legal regulations regarding transnational bankruptcy in ASEAN. Several countries in ASEAN are taking other ways to overcome this problem. This is done by entering into bilateral agreements or by adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law. Indonesia still does not strictly regulate transnational bankruptcy. Looking at the problems above, in this journal a comparison will be made regarding the resolution of transnational bankruptcy in Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia as well as the application of international law in Indonesia in resolving transnational bankruptcy. This research was prepared with the aim of knowing and analyzing the legal regulations regarding transnational bankruptcy in ASEAN as well as identifying and analyzing the roots of obstacles to transnational bankruptcy in Indonesia. normative and comparative juridical approach methods, namely research that is focused on reviewing and comparing library materials or secondary data such as statutory regulations, international regulations, legal works using analytical descriptive research specifications and studied using qualitative data analysis methods. Based on the results of research and discussions carried out by analyzing decision Number 138/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, it was found that Indonesia has not regulated the mechanism for resolving transnational bankruptcy, so it is necessary to apply international law in resolving it by resorting to petition efforts. recognition and implementation of the bankruptcy decision in the country concerned.  },
   issn = {2655-1942},   pages = {276--291}  doi = {10.14710/ldjr.6.2023.276-291},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/lj/article/view/20498}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Transnational bankruptcy resolution is still a legal problem in ASEAN. This problem arises because there is no harmonization of legal regulations regarding transnational bankruptcy in ASEAN. Several countries in ASEAN are taking other ways to overcome this problem. This is done by entering into bilateral agreements or by adopting the UNCITRAL Model Law. Indonesia still does not strictly regulate transnational bankruptcy. Looking at the problems above, in this journal a comparison will be made regarding the resolution of transnational bankruptcy in Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia as well as the application of international law in Indonesia in resolving transnational bankruptcy. This research was prepared with the aim of knowing and analyzing the legal regulations regarding transnational bankruptcy in ASEAN as well as identifying and analyzing the roots of obstacles to transnational bankruptcy in Indonesia. normative and comparative juridical approach methods, namely research that is focused on reviewing and comparing library materials or secondary data such as statutory regulations, international regulations, legal works using analytical descriptive research specifications and studied using qualitative data analysis methods. Based on the results of research and discussions carried out by analyzing decision Number 138/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2016/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, it was found that Indonesia has not regulated the mechanism for resolving transnational bankruptcy, so it is necessary to apply international law in resolving it by resorting to petition efforts. recognition and implementation of the bankruptcy decision in the country concerned.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Comparative Juridical, Bankruptcy Resolution in Indonesia, Transnational Bankruptcy, Transnational Bankruptcy in ASEAN.

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : ID

In Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Law, Development & Justice Review

Recent articles

Analisis Yuridis Komparasi Penyelesaian Kepailitan Transnasional di Singapura dan Malaysia dengan Penyelesaian di Indonesia Analisis Yuridis Rekomendasi Bawaslu Tentang Diskualifikasi Petahana (Studi Kasus Pilkada Kabupaten Tasikmalaya Tahun 2020) Penerapan Teknologi Watermark Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hak Cipta Film pada Platform Bioskoponline.com More recent articles

Buku
Sudirman, Arifin. 2009. Membangun Keamanan Regional di Asean dalam Menanggulangi Terorisme. Jakarta: Erlangga
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. 2018. Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No..37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Edisi Kedua. (Jakarta: Prenademia Group)
Himahanto Juwana. 2002. Hukum Kepailitan, Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti
Jurnal
Fadhilah, Zakia, dkk, 2023, Problematika Kepailitan Transnasional Terhadap Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Aset Debitur Pailit, Notaire, Vol. 6 No. 2
Sefriani, Ineffectiveness of Law on Cross Insolvensi Uncitral Model, Yustisia Vol. 8 No.1
Cholil, Mochammad, 2023, Urgensi Pengaturan Hukum Kepailitan Transnasional Kawasan Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Media Iuris Vol. 6 No. 3
Aditya, Rio, 2021, Analisis Pembentukan Asean Cross Border Insolvency Regulation Sebagai Solusi Permasalahan Kepailitan Lintas Batas Di Asean, Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 3 No. 1
Nopiharni, Lia, dkk, 2021, Problematika Eksekusi Harta Pailit Dalam Cross Border Insolvency, Jurnal USM Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2
Amalia, Jihan, 2019, Urgensi Implementasi Uncitral Model Law On Cross-Border Insolvency Di Indonesia: Studi Komparasi Hukum Kepailitan Lintas Batas Indonesia Dan Singapura, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Vol. 2 No. 2
Halim, Arivan, 2023, Prinsip Resiprositas Dalam Sengketa Kepailitan Lintas Batas Negara (Cross-Border Insolvency), Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 17, No. 4
Hasil Penelitian
Imran Nating, 2021, Sita Umum Aset Debitor Pailit yang Berada di Luar Wilayah Yuridiksi Indonesia, Skripsi, Makassar: Universitas Hassanudin
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Undang-Undang Singapura, Bankruptcy Act (Cap 20, 2009 Rev Ed), Section 151 and 152. UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency with Guide to Enactment
Web-Site
Debby Lin, Commercial Law, http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sg law/laws-of singapore/comm ercial-law/chapter-30
Asian Development Bank, Cross Border Insolvency, http://www.insol.org/pdf/cross pdfs/Singapore.pdf, hal.183
United Nations Information Services diakses dari https://www.unov.org/unov/en/ unis.html

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

LDJR and Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in MMH journal are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

(Penulis yang mengirimkan naskah melakukannya dengan pengertian bahwa jika diterima untuk publikasi, hak cipta artikel tersebut akan diberikan kepada LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro sebagai penerbit jurnal. Hak cipta mencakup hak untuk mereproduksi dan mengirimkan artikel dalam semua bentuk dan media, termasuk cetak ulang, foto, mikrofilm, dan reproduksi serupa lainnya, serta terjemahannya. LDJR dan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro dan Editor berusaha keras untuk memastikan bahwa tidak ada data, pendapat, atau pernyataan yang salah atau menyesatkan dipublikasikan di jurnal. Dengan cara apa pun, isi artikel dan iklan yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal MMH adalah tanggung jawab masing-masing penulis dan pengiklan.)