skip to main content

EVALUASI DAN RETROFITTING SEISMIK BANGUNAN ASRAMA MENGGUNAKAN STEEL PANEL DAMPER : STUDI KASUS GEDUNG JIESHOU, TAIWAN

*Mhd Rony Asshidiqie  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Badrus Zaman  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Dyah Hesti Wardhani  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Received: 18 Jun 2025; Published: 2 Feb 2026.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Bangunan asrama yang terletak di area rumah sakit dan dibangun sebelum diberlakukannya standar desain gempa modern di Taiwan umumnya memiliki kapasitas seismik rendah dan rentan terhadap kerusakan saat terjadi gempa besar. Penelitian ini mengevaluasi performa seismik Gedung Jieshou, sebuah bangunan asrama di kawasan Tri-Service General Hospital, serta merancang strategi retrofit menggunakan Steel Panel Damper (SPD) untuk meningkatkan kapasitas strukturnya. Pemodelan dan analisis dilakukan dengan perangkat lunak ETABS menggunakan pushover analysis nonlinier berbasis metode TEASPA, yang memungkinkan konversi kurva kapasitas menjadi spektrum kapasitas untuk menentukan titik performa dalam bentuk percepatan puncak tanah (PGA). Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kapasitas eksisting belum memenuhi standar CPAMI, dengan rasio gaya geser terhadap berat bangunan (V/W) sebesar 0.234 dan Ap=0.201g pada arah X. Setelah penerapan SPD berkapasitas 75 ton pada 8 titik sampai dengan lantai 7 bangunan, performa meningkat menjadi Ap=0.274g dengan rasio V/W sebesar 0.292. Evaluasi sendi plastis menunjukkan bahwa SPD efektif menyerap energi gempa. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa penggunaan SPD secara signifikan meningkatkan kapasitas lateral dan performa seismik tanpa mengganggu fungsi utama bangunan ketika diimplementasikan.

Fulltext

Article Metrics:

  1. ACI 318-05 (2005). Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-05) and Commentary (318R-05), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA
  2. ACI Committee 318 (2019) ACI 318-19: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI
  3. Asif, Mohammed & Zameeruddin, Mohd. (2021). Evaluating the Effects of Plastic Hinge Location on Performance of the Moment Resisting Frames subjected to Seismic Loads. 2454-9150. 10.35291/2454-9150.2021.0429
  4. ATC (1996), “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,” ATC-40 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, SSC 96-01, Nov
  5. Chen, Y.H. (2003). Seismic Evaluation of RC Buildings Infilled with Brick Walls, PhD Thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan. (dalam Bahasa Mandarin)
  6. Chopra, A. K., & Goel, R. K. (2002). A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 561-582. doi: 10.1002/eqe.144
  7. CNS 3090. (2022). Seismic provisions of the structural concrete construction code, Ministry of Interior, Taiwan (dalam Bahasa Mandarin)
  8. CPAMI (2011). Seismic Design Code for Buildings in Taiwan, Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of The Interior, CPAMI, Taiwan. (dalam Bahasa Mandarin)
  9. FEMA 356 (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA
  10. Govind, M., Kiran, K. S., & Hegde, K. A. (2014). Non linear static pushover analysis of irregular space frame structure with and without t shaped columns. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(3), 663–667. doi.org/10.15623/IJRET.2014.0315123
  11. Hsiao, Fu-Pei & Oktavianus, Yusak & Ou, Yu-Chen & Luu, Ken & Hwang, Shyh-Jiann. (2015). A Pushover Seismic Analysis and Retrofitting Method Applied to Low-Rise RC School Buildings. Advances in Structural Engineering. 18. 311-324. 10.1260/1369-4332.18.3.311
  12. NCREE-09-023 (2009). Technology Handbook for Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of School Buildings, Second Edition, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan. (dalam Bahasa Mandarin)
  13. NCREE (2016). Design test, analysis and application method of three-section seismic resistant columns, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering Conference, Taipei, Taiwan (dalam Bahasa Mandarin)
  14. Rokanuzzaman, M & Khanam, Farjana & Das, Anik & Chowdhury, Sharmin. (2017). Effective Location Of Shear Wall On Performance Of Building Frame Subjected To Lateral Loading
  15. Sangadji, S., Virawan, Z. F., Saifullah, H. A., & Devi, R. H. (2023). Evaluating Retrofitting Strategies of Low-to-Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Structure Based on Its Seismic Fragility. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 13(2), 494. doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.13.2.17480
  16. Tsai, Keh‐Chyuan & Hsu, Chung‐Hsiang & Li, Chao‐Hsien & Chin, Pu‐Yuan. (2018). Experimental and analytical investigations of steel panel dampers for seismic applications in steel moment frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
  17. Tu, Y.H., Liu, T.W., Ao, L.C. and Yeh P.L. (2011). “Nonlinear static seismic analysis and its validation using damage data from reinforced-concrete school buildings”, Third Asia-Pacific Young Researchers and Graduates Symposium, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 306–313
  18. Xiao, G., Wang, H., & Pan, P. (2023). Seismic performance of damaged frame retrofitted with self-centering and energy-dissipating rocking wall. Resilient Cities and Structures, 2(1), 143–151. doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2023.02.009
  19. Yu, E. (2022). A Preliminary Design Procedure for Seismic Retrofit Using Hysteretic Dampers. Journal of The Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 26(2), 59–69. doi.org/10.5000/eesk.2022.26.2.059

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.