skip to main content

Comparison of Percentage Depth Doses with the Published Data for Co-60 Radiotherapy Machine at a Regional Cancer Hospital

*Javaid Ali  -  Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Radiotherapy (LINAR) cancer hospital, Larkana, Sindh, Pakistan
Muhammd Sohail  -  International Collaborative Laboratory of 2D Materials for Optoelectronics Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, Institute of Microscale Optoelectronics, College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
Abdul Samad  -  Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Radiotherapy (LINAR) cancer hospital, Larkana, Sindh, Pakistan
Israr Ahmad  -  Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Radiotherapy (LINAR) cancer hospital, Larkana, Sindh, Pakistan
Hafeezullah Soomro  -  Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Radiotherapy (LINAR) cancer hospital, Larkana, Sindh, Pakistan
Ghufran Biradar  -  3Swat Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology & Radiotherapy (SINOR) cancer hospital, Swat, Pakistan
Irum Naz  -  Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Radiotherapy (LINAR) cancer hospital, Larkana, Sindh, Pakistan
Imadullah Tariq  -  Larkana Institute of Nuclear Medicine & Radiotherapy (LINAR) cancer hospital, Larkana, Sindh, Pakistan
Received: 11 Oct 2023; Revised: 22 Nov 2023; Accepted: 27 Nov 2023; Available online: 30 Nov 2023; Published: 30 Nov 2023.

Citation Format:
Abstract

In external beam radiation therapy, the percentage depth dose (PDD) is a main factor for estimation of patient’s dose and dose distribution in target volume, therefore its accurate estimation is important. The purpose of this article is to compare PDDs with the published PDDs of different authors along central axis at different depths and field sizes for cobalt-60 (Co-60) radiotherapy machine at a regional cancer hospital Pakistan. A dedicated water phantom was used for estimation of PDDs at different depths and different field sizes, for Theratron phoenix Co-60 machine. It was observed that for 10×10 cm2 filed size of Co-60 beam mean percent variation in measured PDDs and published PDDs by different authors was -0.29% to 1.13%, which was within acceptable limit of ± 2%. However, for one author who used semi-empirical equation for PDDs calculation, the mean percent variation between measured PDDs and that of the author was -3.23%, 4.69% and 5.88% for 10×10 cm2, 25×25 cm2 and 30×30 cm2 field sizes of Co-60 beam respectively, which were within acceptable limit of   ±10%. A noticeable increase in PDDs was observed with increase of the field size at given depth which shows obvious contribution of secondary scattered radiation. Also measured PDDs were well matched with that of published PDDs of most of the authors i.e. ± 2%, but the measured PDDs were moderately matched with that of PDDs for only one author for some field sizes and some depths i.e. ±10%, which need to be rectified by taking more such data. 

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
Untitled
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (63KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Water phantom, Spirit level, electrometer, Co-60 Machine, PDD.

Article Metrics:

  1. N. P. Acharya, T. R. Lamichhane, and B. Jha, "Quality Assurance with Dosimetric Consistency of a Co-60 Teletherapy Unit," Journal of Nepal Physical Society, 4, 88-92, (2017)
  2. G. Nilsson, "Cardiovascular side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer”, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, (2012)
  3. S. A. Memon, N. A. Laghari, F. H. Mangi, F. Ahmad, M. M. Hussain, S. Palijo, et al., "Analysis and verification of percent depth dose and tissue maximum ratio for co-60 gamma ray beam," Worl App Sci J, 33, 109-13, (2015)
  4. R. Praveenkumar, K. Santhosh, and A. Augustine, "Estimation of inhomogenity correction factors for a Co-60 beam using Monte Carlo simulation," Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 7, 308-313, (2011)
  5. S. A. Buzdar, M. A. Rao, and A. Nazir, "An analysis of depth dose characteristics of photon in water," Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 21, 41-45, (2009)
  6. F. M. Khan and J. P. Gibbons, Khan's the physics of radiation therapy: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, (2014)
  7. B. Xhafa, T. Mulaj, G. Hodolli, and G. Nafezi, "Dose distribution of photon beam by Siemens linear accelerator," International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 3,67-70, (2014)
  8. M. Butson, J. Mathur, and P. Metcalfe, "Skin dose from radiotherapy X‐ray beams: The influence of energy," Australasian radiology, 41, 148-150, (1997)
  9. H. Bilge, N. Ozbek, M. Okutan, A. Cakir, and H. Acar, "Surface dose and build-up region measurements with wedge filters for 6 and 18 MV photon beams," Japanese journal of radiology, 28, 110-116, (2010)
  10. A. Brahme, "Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy," Acta Radiologica: Oncology, 23, 379-391, (1984)
  11. D. Thwaites, "Accuracy required and achievable in radiotherapy dosimetry: have modern technology and techniques changed our views?”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 012006, (2013)
  12. M. A. A. Omer, "Partial Quality Assessment of 60 Co-Teletherapy Machine Performance," Open Journal of Radiology, 5, 235, (2015)
  13. N. C. Knutson, M. C. Schmidt, M. D. Belley, N. Nguyen, M. Price, S. Mutic, et al., "Equivalency of beam scan data collection using a 1D tank and automated couch movements to traditional 3D tank measurements," Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 19, 60-67, (2018)
  14. D. Mihailidis, "The Physics & Technology of Radiation Therapy," Medical Physics, 38, 3279-3280, (2011)
  15. W. R. Hendee, G. S. Ibbott, and E. G. Hendee, Radiation therapy physics: John Wiley & Sons, (2013)
  16. S. A. T. Abdalla, "Development of semi-empirical equations for In-water dose distribution using Co-60 beams," (2001)
  17. S. R. Malik, M. Rahman, M. Mia, A. Jobber, A. K. Bairagi, S. Reza, et al., "Comprehensive Benchmark Procedures for Commissioning, Quality Assurance and Treatment Delivery for Quality Cancer Therapy Using Co-60 Teletherapy Machine," Bangladesh Journal of Medical Physics, 6, (2013)
  18. T. Jordan, "Section 5. Megavoltage x-ray beams: 2-50 MV," Brit. J. Radiol., 25, (1996)
  19. S. V. Musolino, "Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water; technical reports series No. 398," Health Physics, 81, 592-593, (2001)
  20. M. Bencheikh, A. Maghnouj, and J. Tajmouati, "Dosimetry quality control based on percent depth dose rate variation for checking beam quality in radiotherapy," Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 25, 484-488, (2020)
  21. M. Shahban, B. Hussain, K. Mehmood, and S. U. Rehman, "Estimation of peripheral dose from Co beam in water phantom measured in Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory, Pakistan," Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 22, 212-216, (2017)
  22. R. Ravichandran, "Radioactive Cobalt-60 Teletherapy Machine–Estimates of Personnel Dose in Mock Emergency in Patient Release during “Source Stuck Situation”,Journal of Medical Physics, 42, 96, (2017)
  23. A. Ghose, R. Ravisankar, M. Mitra, and G. Muthukrishnan, "Use of normalised axial distance function in semiempirical calculation of isodose curves for 6 0 Co teletherapy", Applied radiation and isotopes, 46, 655-656, (1995)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.