DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v9i2.22234

Soliditas Internal Partai Berkuasa di Indonesia dalam Mengusung Anak Presiden di Pemilihan Walikota Surakarta 2020

*Dimas Subekti  -  Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Ridho Al-Hamdi  -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2024 JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

How to cite (IEEE): D. Subekti, and R. Al-Hamdi, "Soliditas Internal Partai Berkuasa di Indonesia dalam Mengusung Anak Presiden di Pemilihan Walikota Surakarta 2020," JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 121 - 138, Oct. 2024. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v9i2.22234
Citation Format:
Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan soliditas Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan (PDIP) sebagai partai penguasa di Indonesia dalam mengusung putra Presiden Joko Widodo dalam pemilihan Walikota Surakarta 2020. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah wawancara dan dokumentasi.  Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah proses pengambilan keputusan dalam konteks pencalonan Wali Kota Surakarta oleh PDIP tersentralisasi kepada ketua umum sehingga sebagai organisasi politik lebih mengarah pada personalisasi institusi. Kemudian, PDIP juga tidak terbuka dalam proses rekrutmen calon yang akan diusung nya. Hal ini yang mengakibatkat ketidakharmonisan antara pengurus PDIP di tingkat Kota Surakarta dengan tingkat nasional.  Partai ini sebenarnya lemah dalam hal kepemimpinan prosedural, mekanisme resolusi konflik dan kaderisasi sistematis. Dengan kata lain, meskipun PDIP merupakan partai penguasa di Indonesia, namun soliditas internalnya lemah ketika mencalonkan anak presiden aktif Indonesia dalam pemilihan walikota Surakarta yang merumakan wilayah basis massa nya.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Soliditas; Partai Politik; PDIP; Pemilihan Wali Kota; Kota Surakarta

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Isu Strategis Tantangan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Nasional Dan Infrastruktur Daerah Di Kabupaten Mandailing Natal Provinsi Sumatera Utara Soliditas Internal Partai Berkuasa di Indonesia dalam Mengusung Anak Presiden di Pemilihan Walikota Surakarta 2020 Collaborative Governance dalam Pemberdayaan Sosial Ekonomi Kelompok Difabel Panti Asuhan Bina Siwi More recent articles
  1. Al-Hamdi, R. (2022). Nationalist-Islamist Party in a Liberal Ecosystem: The Solidity and Campaign Strategy of the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) during the 2014 and 2019 Elections. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 13(2), 290–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.2.2022.290-304
  2. Al-Hamdi, R., Handayani, H. S., Fansuri, H., & Sofyan, N. (2023). The Solidity of Islamist Parties in Contemporary Southeast Asian Elections: A Comparative Analysis between the Malaysian Islamist Party (PAS) and the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS). Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 8(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v8i1.43427
  3. Al-Hamdi, R., Sakir, S., Atmojo, M. E., & Efendi, D. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif: Pegangan mahasiswa ilmu pemerintahan. In Pustaka Pelajar. Pustaka Pelajar
  4. Anawati, D. M., & Al-Hamdi, R. (2020). Soliditas Partai dan Stabilitas Perolehan Suara: Konsolidasi Partai Keadilan Sejahtera pada Pemilihan Umum Legislatif 2014. JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 10(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jispo.v10i1.4636
  5. Balmas, M., Rahat, G., Sheafer, T., & Shenhav, S. R. (2014). Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics, 20(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436037
  6. Biezen, I. van, & Poguntke, T. (2014). The decline of membership-based politics. Party Politics, 20(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519969
  7. Bjarnegård, E., & Kenny, M. (2015). Revealing the “secret garden”: The informal dimensions of political recruitment. Politics & Gender, 11(4), 748–753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X15000471
  8. Budi, A. (2020). Less democracy, more centralism: the selection of Candidates by Golkar and PDIP in Indonesian subnational executive elections, 2005–2020. Asian Journal of Political Science, 28(3), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2020.1774909
  9. Budi, M. (2019). PDIP: Tak Ada Syarat Minimal 3 Tahun Jadi Kader untuk Maju Pilkada. Detiknews.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-4826266/ternyata-maju-pilkada-lewat-pdip-harus-jadi-kader-minimal-3-tahun
  10. Budiana, M. (2023). Indonesian Democratic Party Of Struggle (Pdi Perjuangan) Strategy In 2019 West Java Province Legislative Election. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(3), 95–103
  11. Cabada, L., & Tomšič, M. (2016). The rise of person-based politics in the new democracies: The Czech Republic and Slovenia. Politics in Central Europe, 12(2), 29–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0011
  12. CNNIndonesia.com. (2020). Lika-liku Achmad Purnomo Vs Gibran Raih Tiket PDIP di Solo. Cnnindonesia.Com. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200623062336-32-516243/lika-liku-achmad-purnomo-vs-gibran-raih-tiket-pdip-di-solo
  13. Cross, W. P., & Katz, R. S. (2013). The challenges of intra-party democracy. OUP Oxford
  14. Crowder-Meyer, M. (2013). Gendered recruitment without trying: how local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 390–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X13000391
  15. detiknews.com. (2019). Peserta Pilkada via PDIP Harus 3 Tahun Jadi Kader, Amankah Gibran? Detiknews.Com
  16. Djuyandi, Y., & Suparman, S. M. (2020). Konflik Internal PPP Di Tengah Pilkada Jawa Barat 2018. Jurnal Civic Hukum, 5(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.22219/jch.v5i2.13694
  17. Fadil, I. (2020). Gotong Royong Kader PDIP Dinilai Modal Kuat Menangkan Paslon di Pilkada. Merdeka.Com
  18. Flora, M. (2020). Achmad Purnomo Kecewa jika Rekomendasi PDIP di Pilkada Solo Turun ke Gibran. Liputan6.Com. https://www.liputan6.com/pemilu/read/4283213/achmad-purnomo-kecewa-jika-rekomendasi-pdip-di-pilkada-solo-turun-ke-gibran
  19. Hinnebusch, R. A. (2017). Political parties in MENA: their functions and development. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 44(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2017.1281577
  20. Irfan, M. (2020). Gotong Royong Jadi Strategi Jitu PDI Perjuangan di Pilkada Serentak 2020, Hasto: Sari Pati Pancasila. Pikiran-Rakyat.Com
  21. Isnanto, B. A. (2019). Kode Keras PDIP Solo Jika DPP Merekomendasi Gibran: Selesai Partai! Detiknews.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-4780954/kode-keras-pdip-solo-jika-dpp-merekomendasi-gibran-selesai-partai
  22. Isnanto, B. A. (2020). PDIP Solo Masih Kecewa Purnomo Tergeser Gibran, tapi... Detiknews.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-5104892/pdip-solo-masih-kecewa-purnomo-tergeser-gibran-tapi
  23. Kabasakal, M. (2014). Factors influencing intra-party democracy and membership rights: The case of Turkey. Party Politics, 20(5), 700–711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812453366
  24. Lindberg, B., Rasmussen, A., & Warntjen, A. (2008). Party politics as usual? The role of political parties in EU legislative decision-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(8), 1107–1126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802407623
  25. Lupu, N. (2014). Brand dilution and the breakdown of political parties in Latin America. World Politics, 66(4), 561–602. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887114000197
  26. Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2006). Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. Handbook of Party Politics, 11(6), 204–227
  27. Noor, F. (2015). Perpecahan dan soliditas partai Islam: Kasus PKB dan PKS di dekade pertama reformasi. Lipi Press
  28. Pedersen, H. H., & Rahat, G. (2021). Political personalization and personalized politics within and beyond the behavioural arena. Party Politics, 27(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819855712
  29. Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. D. (2008). „Presidentialization, Personalization, and Populism: The Hollowing Out of Party Government “, Cross WP, Katz RS, Pruysers S. The Personalization of Democratic Politics and the Challenge for Political Parties
  30. Priyanto, A., Pribadi, U., & Rahmanto, F. (2021). The effect of political party communication through social media on the results of the 2019 legislative general election (nasdem party, pks, and pdip twitter case study). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 717(1), 12022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/717/1/012022
  31. Priyowidodo, G., Swestin, G., & NurVidyarini, T. (2014). The faces of conflict in a political organization: the case of the Indonesia Democracy Party of Struggle (Partai Demokrsi Indonesia Perjuangan PDI-P). Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p608
  32. Purnama, A. A. D., Utomo, S., & Martini, R. (2014). Strategi Politik PDIP Dalam Pemenangan Pasangan Ganjar–Heru Di Pilgub Jawa Tengah Tahun 2013. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 3(2), 266–275. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/5093
  33. Randall, V., & Svåsand, L. (2002). Party institutionalization in new democracies. Party Politics, 8(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068802008001001
  34. Subekti, D., Sutan, A. J., Nurmandi, A., Mutiarin, D., & Al-Hamdi, R. (2023). The protest voting behaviour among local voters in the 2020 Surakarta mayoral election. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 20578911231161910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231161910

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.