DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jbtr.v9i3.19431

Analysis Interaction of Immunoglobulin G and Immunoglobulin A Against PstS1 as a Basis Specimen Selection for M. tuberculosis Rapid Test Diagnostic Agent

1Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

2Departement of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

3Departement of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

Received: 17 Jul 2023; Revised: 5 Dec 2023; Accepted: 8 Dec 2023; Available online: 31 Dec 2023; Published: 31 Dec 2023.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Biomedicine and Translational Research
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: The recombinant Ag38 protein developed from a local strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis has great potential to be used as a sero-diagnosis agent using the antigen rapid test because it has several epitopes that bind to antibodies. However, it is not yet known which antibody Ag38-recombinant binds maximally between IgA and IgG.

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the interaction between IgG and IgA on Ag-38 rec in silico as a basis for the selection of sero-diagnosis agents in the TB rapid test.

Methods: The results show that the protein PstS1 has a higher binding sensitivity to IgG based on one of the docking models which shows a docking score of -229.70, a confident score of 0.8312 and RMSD 1.060 A. The ramachandran plot also shows that testing on this model has a protein structure that is good, with disallowed regions [X,X] values of 0.5% (less than 0.8%). The results of this analysis show that the most favored regions are 90.5% with a G-factor of -0.27. The quality of the structure of the 3D mooring model can be said to be good because it fulfills the ideal structure requirements.

Conclusion: Ag38-rec antigen M. tuberculosis H37Rv binds to IgG more strongly than IgA.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Untitled
Subject
Type Other
  Download (55KB)    Indexing metadata
 common.other
Untitled
Subject
Type Other
  Download (111KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: M. tuberculosis; Ag38-rec; PstS1; Immunoglobulin G; Immunoglobulin A
Funding: LPDP

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
The Effect of Increased Glucose Induction on GSH Levels in Insulin Gaussia Luciferase (iGL) Cells Derived from Rat Pancreatic Beta Cells Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Screening and Whole Genome Sequencing at an Indonesian Tertiary Hospitals Analysis Of Clerodendrum inerme Plant Compounds as Anti Diabetes Mellitus Through Network Pharmacology Approach Recalcitrant Incomplete Secukinumab Administration in a Psoriasis Patient Exploring Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Pathogenesis through Animal Models: A Systematic Review of Humanized and Pristane-Induced Lupus Mice More recent articles
  1. Nkereuwem E, Kampmann B, Togun T. The need to prioritise childhood tuberculosis case detection. The Lancet 2021;397(10281):1248–1249; doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00672-3
  2. Tebruegge M, Dutta B, Donath S, et al. Mycobacteria-Specific Cytokine Responses Detect Tuberculosis Infection and Distinguish Latent from Active Tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192(4):485–499; doi: 10.1164/rccm.201501-0059OC
  3. Hendon-Dunn CL, Doris KS, Thomas SR, et al. A Flow Cytometry Method for Rapidly Assessing Mycobacterium tuberculosis Responses to Antibiotics with Different Modes of Action. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016;60(7):3869–3883; doi: 10.1128/AAC.02712-15
  4. Dodd PJ, Yuen CM, Sismanidis C, et al. The global burden of tuberculosis mortality in children: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5(9):e898–e906; doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30289-9
  5. Global Tuberculosis Programme GRC. WHO Consolidated Guidelines on Tuberculosis: Module 5: Management of Tuberculosis in Children and Adolescents. (World Health Organization. ed). 2022
  6. Watson A, Li H, Ma B, et al. Human antibodies targeting a Mycobacterium transporter protein mediate protection against tuberculosis. Nat Commun 2021;12(1):602; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20930-0
  7. Awoniyi DO, Baumann R, Chegou NN, et al. Detection of a combination of serum IgG and IgA antibodies against selected mycobacterial targets provides promising diagnostic signatures for active TB. Oncotarget 2017;8(23):37525–37537; doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16401
  8. Baumann R, Kaempfer S, Chegou NN, et al. Serologic diagnosis of tuberculosis by combining Ig classes against selected mycobacterial targets. Journal of Infection 2014;69(6):581–589; doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.014
  9. Chen T, Lin J, Wang W, et al. Cytokine and Antibody Based Diagnostic Algorithms for Sputum Culture-Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis. PLoS One 2015;10(12):e0144705; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144705
  10. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2021. 2021
  11. M. Raras TY, Lyrawati D. Cloning and expression of pab gene of M. tuberculosis isolated from pulmonary TB patient in E.coli DH5α. Medical Journal of Indonesia 2011;247; doi: 10.13181/mji.v20i4.458
  12. Raras TYM, Sholeh G, Lyrawati D. Salivary sIg-A response against the recombinant Ag38 antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Indonesian strain. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7(1):129–35
  13. Ivanyi J. Function and Potentials of M. tuberculosis Epitopes. Front Immunol 2014;5; doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00107
  14. de Araujo LS, de Bárbara Moreira da Silva Lins N, Leung JAM, et al. Close contact interferon-gamma response to the new PstS1(285–374):CPF10: a preliminary 1-year follow-up study. BMC Res Notes 2017;10(1):59; doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2360-4
  15. Coscolla M, Copin R, Sutherland J, et al. M. tuberculosis T Cell Epitope Analysis Reveals Paucity of Antigenic Variation and Identifies Rare Variable TB Antigens. Cell Host Microbe 2015;18(5):538–548; doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.10.008
  16. Hernndez-Santoyo A, Yair A, Altuzar V, et al. Protein-Protein and Protein-Ligand Docking. In: Protein Engineering - Technology and Application InTech; 2013; doi: 10.5772/56376
  17. Sailapathi A, Murugan G, Somarathinam K, et al. Proposing the Promiscuous Protein Structures in JNK1 and JNK3 for Virtual Screening in Pursuit of Potential Leads. ACS Omega 2020;5(8):3969–3978; doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03458
  18. Lakshmi B, Sinduja C, Archunan G, et al. Ramachandran analysis of conserved glycyl residues in homologous proteins of known structure. Protein Science 2014;23(6):843–850; doi: 10.1002/pro.2468
  19. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004;3(11):935–949; doi: 10.1038/nrd1549
  20. Gunasekaran K, Ramakrishnan C, Balaram P. Disallowed Ramachandran Conformations of Amino Acid Residues in Protein Structures. J Mol Biol 1996;264(1):191–198; doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0633
  21. Palma C, Schiavoni G, Abalsamo L, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis PstS1 amplifies IFN-γ and induces IL-17/IL-22 responses by unrelated memory CD4+ T cells via dendritic cell activation. Eur J Immunol 2013;43(9):2386–2397; doi: 10.1002/eji.201243245
  22. Jeon HS, Shin A-R, Son Y-J, et al. An evaluation of the use of immunoglobulin A antibody response against mycobacterial antigens for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2015;27(3):344–351; doi: 10.1177/1040638715578879

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.