DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.8.2.93-102

The Changing Face of Rural Kediri: A Study on Rural Transformation Processes

*Dixzi Anindita Sandy  -  Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Kulon Progo, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Received: 21 May 2023; Accepted: 30 Jun 2023; Published: 31 Oct 2023.
Editor(s): Jawoto Setyono
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Urbanization, along with the flow of various elements, has triggered changes in the economic, social, and spatial structures of many regions, driving processes of rural transformation. This transformation presents challenges for both rural and urban development due to its broad impact on physical, socio-economic, and cultural aspects. Kediri Regency, located on Java Island, has experienced such changes, with 29 villages reclassified as urban between 2000 and 2010, based on BPS Regulation No. 37 of 2010—indicating a clear sign of rural transformation. This study aims to assess the degree of rural transformation in Kediri Regency by analyzing physical, economic, and socio-demographic aspects. The research uses spatial and socio-economic data from 2013 and 2023, analyzed through descriptive quantitative methods, GIS, and a weighted scoring analysis. Findings show that all three studied villages—Bringin, Gempolan, and Petok—have undergone varying levels of transformation. Bringin displays the most significant economic and socio-demographic transformation, driven by growth in non-agricultural employment, household income, and access to education and health services. Gempolan ranks highest in overall transformation due to industrial growth, land-use changes, and expanded infrastructure and services. In contrast, Petok shows minimal transformation, particularly in economic and physical aspects, with stagnant development indicators. Overall, rural transformation is most advanced in Bringin, likely due to its proximity to Pare, a secondary city, which stimulates rural change through increased urban economic interaction.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: rural transformation; economic transformation; physical transformation; socio-demographic transformation

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
  1. Arfanuzzaman, M., & Dahiya, B. (2019). Sustainable urbanization in South Asia: A sourcebook for local governments. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6820-7
  2. Bappenas. (2020). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020–2024. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Bappenas
  3. Barthel, S. & Isendahl, C. 2013. Urban gardens, agriculture, and water management: Sources of resilience for long-term food security in cities. Ecological Economics, 86, 224-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.018
  4. Belton, B., & Filipski, M. (2019). Rural transformation in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. World Development, 114, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.10.004
  5. Berdegué, J., Rosada, T., & Bebbington, A. (2013). The rural transformation. World Development, 41, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.008
  6. D’Amour, C. B., Reitsma, F., Baiocchi, G., Barthel, S., Güneralp, B., Erb, K. H., ... & Seto, K. C. (2017). Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), 8939–8944. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606036114
  7. Firman, T. (2017). The urban–rural interface and its impact on regional development in Indonesia. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 4(1), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2017.1349734
  8. Guan, X., Wei, H., Lu, S., Dai, Q., & Su, H. (2018). Assessment on the urbanization strategy in China: Achievements, challenges and reflections. Habitat International, 71, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.009
  9. IFAD. (2016). Rural development report 2016: Fostering inclusive rural transformation. International Fund for Agricultural Development. https://www.ifad.org/en/web/knowledge/publication/asset/39374574
  10. Igawa, N. and Nakamura, H. (2001). All sky model as a standard sky for the simulation of daylite environment. Building and Environment, 36, 763-770. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00062-7
  11. Imai, K. S., & Malaeb, B. (2018). Asia's rural transformation: Evidence, outcomes, and challenges. World Development, 107, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.003
  12. Kemendesa PDTT. (2020). Indeks Desa Membangun (IDM) Tahun 2020. Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia
  13. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: University Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Inc
  14. Kittler, R. (1985). Luminance distribution characteristics of homogeneous skies: A measurement and prediction strategy. Lighting Research and Technology, 17(4), 183 - 188
  15. Kusumo, F. H., & Kurniasih, H. (2021). Perubahan spasial kawasan perdesaan di sekitar kawasan pertumbuhan ekonomi: Studi kasus Kabupaten Sleman. Tataloka, 23(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.23.1.45-56
  16. Liu, Y. (2021). Integrated urban–rural development: A key pathway to sustainable territorial development. Sustainability, 13(5), 2816. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052816
  17. Mitsuda, H., & Ito, R. (2011). Rural transformation in peri-urban areas: Land use and livelihood changes around secondary cities in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 8(1), 71–90
  18. Perraudeau, M. (1988). Luminance models. In National Lighting Conference. Cambridge, UK, March 27-30
  19. Puspa Sari, Y., Pratiwi, R. D., & Widodo, T. W. (2018). Dinamika transformasi perdesaan di wilayah pinggiran Kota Kediri. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 6(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.6.2.138-152
  20. Putri, D. A. (2020). Perubahan struktur ekonomi dan penggunaan lahan di Kabupaten Kediri: Indikasi transformasi perdesaan. Tugas Akhir Sarjana, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  21. Rigg, J. (2014). Rethinking rural: Global community and economic transitions. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 36(3), 356–359. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs36-3k
  22. Roberts, B. H., Kanaley, T., & Sridharan, S. (2019). Urbanization, planning and development in the global South. Routledge
  23. Seng, D. C. (2012). Improving the governance context and framework conditions of natural hazard early warning systems. Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management, 2, 1-25. doi: 10.5595/idrim.2012.0020
  24. Tacoli, C. (2003). The links between urban and rural development. Environment & Urbanization, 15(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780301500111
  25. Wilondari, R. S., Wilonoyudho, S., & Harini, R. (2017). Ketimpangan spasial dalam transformasi perdesaan di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 1(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v1i3.24
  26. Yang, Y., Liu, Y., & Liu, J. (2020). Spatial patterns and driving forces of rural transformation in China. Land Use Policy, 94, 104552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104552

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.