skip to main content

The Role of Non-Agricultural Rural Activities in the Transformation of Rural Areas in Kediri Regency

*Isnaini Nur Husna  -  Direktorat Jenderal Tata Ruang, Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Received: 21 May 2023; Accepted: 30 Jun 2023; Published: 31 Oct 2023.
Editor(s): Jawoto Setyono
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Rural-to-urban transformation is marked by increasing population movement and a shift from agricultural to non-agricultural sectors. This transformation reflects the impact of urbanization on rural areas, resulting in economic diversification and job pluralism. Non-agricultural rural activities provide alternative income sources, especially for households with limited or no agricultural land, contributing to labor absorption, economic growth, and poverty reduction. Kediri Regency in East Java exemplifies this phenomenon, with 29 villages reclassified as urban according to the Central Bureau of Statistic Regulation No.37 of 2010. This study aims to analyze non-agricultural rural activities in the context of rural transformation in Kediri Regency. It examines external and internal driving factors as well as the outcomes of such activities. A quantitative approach was used, including descriptive statistical analysis and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). A scoring method identified the most influential drivers and outcomes. The study used multistage sampling area and snowball techniques focusing on non-agricultural households in three villages: Bringin, Gempolan, and Petok, each with varying proximity to primary and secondary cities. Findings show that proximity to urban centers is the main external driver in Bringin, while physical capital dominates in Gempolan and Petok. Internally, innovation drives non-agricultural activities in Bringin and Petok, whereas access to credit is more influential in Gempolan. Income improvement is the most reported outcome across all villages. The research concludes with policy recommendations to support rural development programs aligned with the most significant influencing factors, fostering diversification and sustainable rural transformation.

Fulltext Email colleagues
Keywords: external driving factors; internal driving factors; non-agricultural rural activities; outcomes of non-agricultural activities; rural transformation.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
  1. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2023). Unlocking the Potential of Indonesia’s Rural Enterprises. Manila
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Statistik Indonesia 2020. Jakarta: BPS
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik Kediri. (2020). Kediri Dalam Angka 2020. Kediri: BPS
  4. Berdegué, J. A., Rosada, T., & Bebbington, A. (2013). The Rural Transformation. In Pathways to prosperity in rural Nicaragua. Inter-American Development Bank
  5. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper 296
  6. Christiaensen, L., & Todo, Y. (2014). Poverty Reduction During the Rural–Urban Transformation – The Role of the Missing Middle. World Development, 63, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.002
  7. Damanik, J. (2013). Strategi Pengembangan Wilayah Berbasis Potensi Lokal. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 24(3), 180–192
  8. Dary, S. K. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Kegiatan Ekonomi Nonpertanian. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 12(2), 134–145
  9. Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press
  10. FAO. (2021). Digital Agriculture Report: Rural Transformation through Innovation in Southeast Asia. Rome
  11. Firman, T. (2003). Potential Impact of Decentralization on Spatial Development in Indonesia. Habitat International, 27(4), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00006-6
  12. Gordon, A., & Craig, C. (2001). Rural Non-farm Activities and Poverty Alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Natural Resources Institute
  13. Haggblade, S., Hazell, P., & Reardon, T. (2010). The Rural Non-farm Economy: Prospects for Growth and Poverty Reduction. World Development, 38(10), 1429–1441
  14. Jedwab, R., Christiaensen, L., & Gindelsky, M. (2017). Demography, Urbanization and Development: Rural Push, Urban Pull and Urban Push?. Journal of Urban Economics, 98, 6–16
  15. Lanjouw, P., & Feder, G. (2001). Rural Non-farm Activities and Rural Development: From Experience Towards Strategy. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series
  16. Liu, Y. (2021). Rural Transformation Development and Planning in The New Era. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(2), 163–180
  17. Reardon, T., Berdegué, J., & Escobar, G. (2001). Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in Latin America: Patterns and Determinants. World Development, 29(3), 395–409
  18. Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper No. 72
  19. Tacoli, C. (2006). Rural-urban Linkages and Pro-poor Agricultural Growth: An Overview. FAO
  20. Tacoli, C., McGranahan, G., & Satterthwaite, D. (2015). Urbanisation, Rural–urban Migration and Urban Poverty. Human Settlements Discussion Paper Series. IIED
  21. UN Women. (2022). Empowering Women in Rural Economies in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok
  22. View, J., & Reardon, T. (2015). Transformation of Rural Nonfarm Employment in Developing Countries. World Development, 61, 395–409
  23. World Bank. (2022). Indonesia Rural Revitalization: A Spatial Approach. Washington, D.C
  24. Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020). Urbanization and Rural Transformation in China: A Perspective of Land Use Change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118314

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.