Implementation of servant leadership in profit and non-profit context: is it different?

Diah Astrini Amir; Claudius Budi Santoso; Rasistia Wisandianing Primadineska

doi:10.14710/dijb.4.1.2021.1-7

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dijb.4.1.2021.1-7

Implementation of servant leadership in profit and non-profit context: is it different?

Diah Astrini Amir¹ , Claudius Budi Santoso², Rasistia Wisandianing Primadineska¹

¹Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN, Indonesia

²Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{DIJB9441,
    author = {Diah Amir and Claudius Santoso and Rasistia Primadineska},
    title = {Implementation of servant leadership in profit and non-profit context: is it different?},
    journal = {Diponegoro International Journal of Business},
  volume = {4},
    number = {1},
    year = {2021},
    keywords = {servant leadership; organizational citizenship behavior; profit organization; non-proft organization; social learning theory},
    abstract = {The purpose of this study is to examine the differences between servant leadership (SL) in the profit and non-profit organization sectors. This study also examines the effectiveness of SL on the subordinate performance in profit and non-profit organizations. A total of 254 subordinates from profit and non-profit organizations participated in this study. This study used non-probability sampling, purposive sampling technique. This study uses MANOVA to examine the differences between SL in profit and non-profit organizations and uses simple regression to examine the effect of SL on employee performance. The results of the study report that there are no significant differences between servant leadership in profit or non-profit organizations. Servant leadership also consistently has a positive and significant effect on subordinate Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) for both profit and non-profit organizations. This research was measured using perceptions of subordinates and using a quantitative approach. The early emergence of SL was associated with religious organizations (non-profit) so that SL was attached to leadership that was more appropriate in non-profit organizations. However, some argue that SL effective in the profit organization sector. This study is expected to provide empirical evidence regarding the application of servant leadership in profit vs non-profit organizations in servant leadership studies.},
   issn = {2580-4995},   pages = {1--7}  doi = {10.14710/dijb.4.1.2021.1-7},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/ijb/article/view/9441}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the differences between servant leadership (SL) in the profit and non-profit organization sectors. This study also examines the effectiveness of SL on the subordinate performance in profit and non-profit organizations. A total of 254 subordinates from profit and non-profit organizations participated in this study. This study used non-probability sampling, purposive sampling technique. This study uses MANOVA to examine the differences between SL in profit and non-profit organizations and uses simple regression to examine the effect of SL on employee performance. The results of the study report that there are no significant differences between servant leadership in profit or non-profit organizations. Servant leadership also consistently has a positive and significant effect on subordinate Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) for both profit and non-profit organizations. This research was measured using perceptions of subordinates and using a quantitative approach. The early emergence of SL was associated with religious organizations (non-profit) so that SL was attached to leadership that was more appropriate in non-profit organizations. However, some argue that SL effective in the profit organization sector. This study is expected to provide empirical evidence regarding the application of servant leadership in profit vs non-profit organizations in servant leadership studies.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: servant leadership; organizational citizenship behavior; profit organization; non-proft organization; social learning theory

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 4, No 1 (2021)

Recent articles

Front matter Back matter Multi-layer agility: a proposed concept of business agility in organizational behavior perspective Can information be too much? the moderating role of Covid-19 information on the effect of job stress on job performance Technology adoption on online learning during Covid-19 pandemic: implementation of technology acceptance model (TAM) More recent articles

Allen, S., Winston, B. E., Tatone, G. R., & Crowson, H. M. (2018). Exploring a model of servant leadership, empowerment, and commitment in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21311
Carter, D., & Baghurst, T. (2013). The influence of servant leadership on restaurant employee engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1882-0
Choudhary, A. I., Akhtar, S. A., & Zaheer, A. (2013). Impact of transformational and servant leadership on organizational performance: a comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1470-8
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods (12nd ed.). McGraw-Hill
Dierendonck, D. Van, & Nuijten, I. (2011). The servant leadership survey : development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1
Dixon, D. L. (2013). Relationships among servant leadership, organizational citizenship behavior, and school climate in alabama high schools [The University of Alabama]. https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1882
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
Farrow, D. L., Valenzi, E. R., Bass, B. M., & Binghamton, Y. (1980). A comparison of leadership and situational characteristics within profit and non-profit organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 334–338. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/AMBPP.1980.4977898
Flanike, F. (2006). Is the bible relevant to servant-leadership? Journal of Applied Christian Leadership, 1(1), 32–39. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=jacl
GÜÇEL, C., & Begec, S. (2012). The Effect of the servant leadership on organizational citizenship behavior: Case study of a university. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 4(1), 107–116
Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited
Han, Y., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kakabadse, A. (2010). Servant leadership in the people’s republic of china: a case study of the public sector. Journal of Management Development, 29(3), 265–281. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/02621711011025786/full/html
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations the GLOBE study of 62 societies. SAGE Publications
Keith, K. M., & Dinner, C. F. (2009). Servant Leadership in Business. University of Washington Seattle, Washington
Krekeler, L. a. (2010). The Relationship Between Servant Leadership Behavior and Individual Personality Style in New York Annual Conference United Methodist Pastors. Theses, Paper 54
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance : the role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.131
Mathur, G., & Negi, P. (2014). Servant leadership and organizational citizenship behaviour among employees of service sector. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 7(2), 191–196. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Garima_Mathur3/publication/271198499_Servant_Leadership_and_Organizational_Citizenship_Behaviour_Among_Employees_of_Service_Sector/links/54c091330cf21674ce9fcf94.pdf
Melchar, D., & Bosco, S. (2010). Achieving high organization performance. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 9(1), 74–88
Niewold, J. (n.d.). Beyond servant leadership. Journal of Biblical Perspectives in Leadership, 1(2), 118–134. https://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/jbpl/vol1no2/JBPLVol1No2_Niewold.pdf
Palumbo, R. (2016). Challenging servant leadership in the nonprofit sector. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 6(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18666/JNEL-2016-V6-I2-6824
Pekerti, A. A., & Sendjaya, S. (2010). Exploring servant leadership across cultures: Comparative study in Australia and Indonesia. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(5), 754–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585191003658920
Sargeant, A., & Day, H. (2018). A study of nonprofit leadership in the US and its impending crisis. In Sustainable Philanthropy with Plymouth University. https://thenonprofitacademy.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/WakeUpCall_Report.pdf
Schneider, S. K., & George, W. M. (2011). Servant leadership versus transformational leadership in voluntary service organizations. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111099283
Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J. C. (2002). Servant Leadership: Its Origin, Development, and Application in Organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900205
Shirin, A. (2014). Is servant leadership inherently christian? Journal of Religion and Business Ethics, 3(1), 13–25. https://via.library.depaul.edu/jrbe/vol3/iss1/13/
Smith, B. N., Montagno, R. V., & Kuzmenko, T. N. (2004). Transformational and servant leadership: content and contextual comparisons. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190401000406
Stone, A. G., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership : a difference in leader focus. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410538671
Topcu, M. K., Gursoy, A., & Gurson, P. (2015). The role of the servant leadership on the relation between ethical climate perception and innovative work. European Research Studies Journal, 18(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/440
van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462
Wells, J. E., & Peachey, J. W. (2016). Called to serve: exploring servant leadership in the context of sport-for-development. Journal of Sport for Development, 4(7), 12–24. https://jsfd.org/2016/12/03/called-to-serve-exploring-servant-leadership-in-the-context-of-sport-for-development/
Winston, B. E. (2004). Servant leadership at heritage bible college: a single-case study. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(7), 600–617. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730410561486

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Author(s) Rights

In order for Diponegoro International Journal of Business (DIJB) to publish and disseminate research articles, we need publishing rights (transferred from author(s) to publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the author(s) and DIJB. This agreement deals with the transfer or license of the copyright of publishing to DIJB, while authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. DIJB supports the need for authors to share, disseminate and maximize the impact of their research and these rights, in any databases.

As an author, you have rights to a large range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institute or company. These Author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in DIJB has wide rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:

use for classroom teaching by Author or Author's institution and presentation at a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
use for internal training by the author's company;
distribution to colleagues for their research use;
use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article);
voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author’s institution for scholarly purposes,

(but it should follow the open-access license of Creative Common CC-by-SA License).

Authors/readers/third parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (the name of the creator and attribution parties (authors detail information), a copyright notice, an open-access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material) and provide a link to the license.

Authors/readers/third parties can read, print and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g. display in a repository), translate the article, download for text and data mining purposes, re-use portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or re-use for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).

Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (Publishing Right)

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to the Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Diponegoro as the publisher of DIJB.

Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP)'. An e-mail will be sent to the Corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a CTAP form by the online version of this agreement.

DIJB, the publisher, and the editorial board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in DIJB are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

Remember, even though we ask for a transfer of copyright for publishing (CTAP), our journal Author(s) retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights as mentioned before.

The Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form can be downloaded here