KESESUAIAN KEBERADAAN RUMAH TIDAK LAYAK HUNI (RTLH) TERHADAP TATA RUANG WILAYAH DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA

Su Ritohardoyo; Mohammad Isnaini Sadali

doi:10.14710/tataloka.19.4.291-305

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.19.4.291-305

KESESUAIAN KEBERADAAN RUMAH TIDAK LAYAK HUNI (RTLH) TERHADAP TATA RUANG WILAYAH DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA

*Su Ritohardoyo - Program Studi Pembangunan Wilayah, Fakultas. Geografi UGM Yogyakarta

Mohammad Isnaini Sadali - Program Studi Pembangunan Wilayah, Fakultas. Geografi UGM Yogyakarta

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{tataloka1446,
    author = {Su Ritohardoyo and Mohammad Sadali},
    title = {KESESUAIAN KEBERADAAN RUMAH TIDAK LAYAK HUNI (RTLH) TERHADAP TATA RUANG WILAYAH DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA},
    journal = {TATALOKA},
  volume = {19},
    number = {4},
    year = {2017},
    keywords = {Suitability; Un-inhabitable residence (RTLH);  Spatial Pattern; Strategy},
    abstract = { Residence is one of the basic rights of every person, meaning that every citizen has the right to reside and got a decent living environment. But in reality, not everyone can get a place to stay that is livable. This has been, is, and will became always a problem for communities and governments in developing residential areas with proper environmental quality. Therefore, this paper presents the results of research that aims to: (1) identification and mapping out where residence were un-inhabitable (RTLH); (2) analysis of the suitability of the location RTLH the spatial plan; and (3) analysis RTLH handling, to formulate strategies based on spatial policy. The study was conducted in the city of Yogyakarta, is based on a spatial approach using secondary data, data analysis using quantitative and qualitative descriptive methode. The results showed that the number of RTLH in Yogyakarta until the year 2014 as a whole is 3,304 residences, or 3.55 percent of the total number of residences (92 965 pieces), spread over 14 districts and 45 villages. Judging spatial, the majority (65.63%) RTLH is in a residential zone, while others (34.37%) RTLH are in non-residential zone. RTLH in non-residential zone, 13.09 percent are in protected areas, namely in the zone of green open space (RTH) of 9.42 percent, and 3.67 percent in the zones of nature reserves and cultural heritage. The remaining 21.28 percent RTLH contained in non-residential area of cultivation. RTLH handling can be done by way of demolition, relocation, land acquisition, as well as indemnity. RTLH for priority handling should be done in a protected area. Efforts that can be implemented to overcome the problems RTLH and slums, is to provide support for policy and program strategies appropriate, integrated and comprehensive. },
   issn = {2356-0266},   pages = {291--305}  doi = {10.14710/tataloka.19.4.291-305},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/article/view/1446}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Residence is one of the basic rights of every person, meaning that every citizen has the right to reside and got a decent living environment. But in reality, not everyone can get a place to stay that is livable. This has been, is, and will became always a problem for communities and governments in developing residential areas with proper environmental quality. Therefore, this paper presents the results of research that aims to: (1) identification and mapping out where residence were un-inhabitable (RTLH); (2) analysis of the suitability of the location RTLH the spatial plan; and (3) analysis RTLH handling, to formulate strategies based on spatial policy. The study was conducted in the city of Yogyakarta, is based on a spatial approach using secondary data, data analysis using quantitative and qualitative descriptive methode. The results showed that the number of RTLH in Yogyakarta until the year 2014 as a whole is 3,304 residences, or 3.55 percent of the total number of residences (92 965 pieces), spread over 14 districts and 45 villages. Judging spatial, the majority (65.63%) RTLH is in a residential zone, while others (34.37%) RTLH are in non-residential zone. RTLH in non-residential zone, 13.09 percent are in protected areas, namely in the zone of green open space (RTH) of 9.42 percent, and 3.67 percent in the zones of nature reserves and cultural heritage. The remaining 21.28 percent RTLH contained in non-residential area of cultivation. RTLH handling can be done by way of demolition, relocation, land acquisition, as well as indemnity. RTLH for priority handling should be done in a protected area. Efforts that can be implemented to overcome the problems RTLH and slums, is to provide support for policy and program strategies appropriate, integrated and comprehensive.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Suitability; Un-inhabitable residence (RTLH); Spatial Pattern; Strategy

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 19, No 4 (2017): Volume 19 Number 4, November 2017

Recent articles

PEMBATASAN PERKEMBANGAN PERMUKIMAN KAWASAN PINGGIRAN SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGENDALIAN PERKEMBANGAN KOTA SEMARANG ANALISIS PREFERENSI DAN PROSPEKTIF PARTISIPATIF DALAM PERENCANAAN PENATAAN DAN PENYESUAIAN ULANG LAHAN (LAND READJUSTMENT) KAWASAN KAMPUNG BRAGA BANDUNG MODEL REKLAMASI PANTAI SECARA BERKELANJUTAN KASUS : PANTAI KOTA MAKASSAR Front matter Back matter More recent articles

Badan Perencanaan Pembangnan Daerah (Bappeda) Kota Yogyakarta, 2015. Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2007. Statistik Kesejahteraan Rakyat Tahun 2007. Jakarta
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2008. Statistik Kesejahteraan Rakyat Tahun 2008. Jakarta
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). 2014. Statistik Kesejahteraan Rakyat Tahun 2014. Jakarta
Dani, E. T., Sitorus, S. R. P., dan Munibah, K. 2017. Analisis Penggunaan Lahan dan Arahan Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang di Kabupaten Bogor. TATALOKA, 19 (1): 40 – 52. DOI: 10.14710/tataloka.19.1.40-52
Fahimuddin, M. M, Barus, B., dan Mulatsih, S. 2016. Analisis Daya Dukung Lahan di Kota Baubau, Sulawesi Tenggara. TATALOKA, 18 (3): 183 – 196
Fahmi, F. Z., Hudalah, D., Rahayu, P., and Woltjer, J. 2014. Extended Urbanization in Small and Medium-size Cities. The Case of Cirebon, Indonesia. Habitat International, 42: 1-10
Faruqi, I., Hadi S., dan Sahara. 2015. Analisis Potensi dan Kesenjangan Wilayah Kabupaten Sukabumi, Propinsi Jawa Barat. TATALOKA, 17(4): 231 – 247
Firman, T., Kombaitan, B., and Pradono, P. 2007. The Dynamics of Indonesia’s Urbanization, 1980-2006. Urban Policy and Research, 25(4): 433-454
Hadi, B. S. dan Mulyowiyono, S. 2003. Evaluasi Perubahan Kualitas Lingkungan Permukiman Kota berdasarkan Foto Udara Multitemporal: Kasus Kecamatan Umbulharjo dengan Bantuan Sistem Informasi Geografi. J. Manusia dan Lingkungan, 10 (2): 63 – 73
Jeremy, B. 2015. UN State of The World Cities 2009. Ireland: European Anti Poverty Network
Kementerian Perumahan Rakyat RI. 2014. Renstra Kemenpera Tahun 2010-2014. Dalam http://dokumen.tips/real-estate/rencana-strategis-kementerian-perumahan-rakyat-renstra-kemenpera-tahun-2010-2014.html. Diunduh tanggal 1 Juni 2017,
Keputusan Walikota Nomor 393 tahun 2014 tentang Penetapan Lokasi Kawasan Tidak Layak Huni di Kota Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Kantor Pemerintah Daerah Kota Yogyakarta
Khoo, T.C. 2015, New Lenses on Future Cities, Suplemen New Lens Scenarios. Singapura: Center Liveable Cities
Kurniati, N. 2014. Pemenuhan Hak atas Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman yang Layak dan Penerapannya Menurut Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak-hak Ekonomi, Sosial,dan Budaya di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1 (1): 78-98
Lynch, K. 2009. Good City Form. Conference Paper in Computer Science and Information Engineering, 2009 WRI World Congress Hokkaido University. May 2009
Muhammad, B. A. dan Sulistryarso, H. 2016. Arahan Penataan Lingkungan Permukiman Kumuh Kecamatan Kenjeran dengan Pendekatan Eco-Sattlements. Jurnal Teknik. 5 (2): 124-128
Muta’ali, L. dan Nugroho, A.R. 2016. Perkembangan Program Penanganan Permukiman Kumuh di Indonesia dari Masa ke Masa. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
Nurhidayati, E., Buchori, I., dan Mussadun, M. 2016. Prediksi Perkembangan Lahan Permukiman terhadap Kerentanan Bencana Banjir dan Kebakaran di Permukiman Tepian Sungai Kapuas Kota Pontianak. TATALOKA, 18 (4): 249 – 260
Purwanto, E., Setioko, B., dan Olivia, D. 2017. Faktor - Faktor Pengaruh Kinerja Permukiman Sebagai Antisipasi Perwujudan Kampung Wisata Bahari: Studi Kasus: Kampung Nelayan Tambak Lorok, Kota Semarang. TATALOKA, 19 (1): 1 – 14. DOI: 10.14710/tataloka.19.1.1-14
Ratnasari, A., Sitorus, S. R. P., dan Tjahjono, B. 2015. Perencanaan Kota Hijau Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Penggunaan Lahan Dan Kecukupan RTH. TATALOKA, 17 (4): 196 - 208
Sadali, M. I. 2014. Trend Perkembangan Penduduk dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kebutuhan RTH (Ruang Terbuka Hijau) di D.I. Yogyakarta. Di dalam Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah Ikatan Geograf Indonesia (IGI). Eds. Hastuti et al. pp: 366-379. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi UNY
Safaruddin; S. T. dan Izziah. 2015. Penataan Perumahan Kumuh Desa Pusong Kecamatan Banda Sakti Kota Loksumawe. Jurnal Teknik Sipil. 5 (1): 61-70
Santosa, E. B., dan Therik, L. V. 2016. Faktor Penentu Bertempat Tinggal pada Kawasan Kumuh di Kota Malang Berdasarkan Teori Doxiadis. Tata Loka, 18 (4): 261 – 273
Satyohutomo, M. 2009. Manajemen Kota dan Wilayah, Realita dan Tantangan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
Satyohutomo, M. 2016. Tata Guna Tanah dan Penyerasian Tata Ruang. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Setiadi, A. 2014. Tipologi dan Pola Penanganan Permukiman Kumuh di Kota Bontang. Tata Loka, 16 (4): 220 - 233
Setyono, J. S., Yunus, H. S., dan Giyarsih, S. R. 2017. Pengelolaan Kota – Kota Kecil di Jawa Tengah: Studi Kasus pada Empat Kota Kecil di Wilayah Joglosemar. Tataloka, 19 (2): 142 – 162. DOI: 10.14710/tataloka.19.2.142-162
Sunarti dan Apriliasari, N. K. 2015. Dampak Perubahan Iklim terhadap Permukiman Pesisir di Kelurahan Demaan Kabupaten Jepara. Tata Loka, 17 (4): 248 – 256
Tacoli, C. (ed.). 2006. The Earthscan Reader in Rural-Urban Lingkages. London: Earthscan Publication
Triatmodjo, S., Djunaedi, A., Sastrosasmito, S., dan Subroto, Y. W. 2009. Desakralisasi Ruang Cikal Bakal di Permukiman Kauman Yogyakarta: Sebuah Perubahan Makna Ruang Permukiman Tradisional di Kota. J. Manusia dan Lingkungan, 16 (3): 141 – 152
Undang Undang Dasar (UUD) 1945, Penjelasan Pasal 28 Sampai Pasal 28J UUD 1945. Dalam http://limc4u.com/uud-1945/penjelasan-pasal/penjelasan-pasal-28-sampai-pasal-28j-uud-1945/, Diunduh tanggal 1 Juni 2017
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Perumahan Dan Kawasan Permukiman. Dalam t http://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/lt4d50fb4b171ba/node /39/uu-no-1tahun -2011-perumahan-dan-kawasan-permu. Diunduh tanggal 1 Juni 2017
United Nations Population Division. 2007. World Urbanization Prospects. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division
Yudarwati, R., Sitorus, S. R. P., dan Munibah, K. Arahan Pengendalian Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Menggunakan Markov Celuler –Automata di Kabupaten Cianjur. Tata Loka, 18 (4): 211 - 221
Yunus, H.S. 2002. Struktur Tata Ruang Kota. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at Tataloka has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution, (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants ; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes.

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Tataloka . Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from Tataloka . However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

Tataloka and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in Tataloka. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.

The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form - Indonesian] [Copyright Transfer Form - English]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editor in the form of printed letters, scanned documents sent via email or fax.