skip to main content

Manajemen Risiko Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Perkuliahan dengan Metode Severity Index

*Raftonado Situmorang  -  Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Indonesia
Muhammad Arsyad  -  Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Indonesia
Oryza Lhara Sari  -  Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Indonesia
Andika Ade Indra Saputra  -  Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
The construction projects for Buildings C and D were delayed in construction process due to financial constraints in completing building construction and the project was re-implemented so that the two buildings were classified as Construction in Progress. Efforts are made to avoid obstacles by carrying out effective risk management. Therefore, all projects require proper risk management. On the basis of these events, risk management is carried out with the aim of knowing the risks that may occur, knowing the level of risk, and knowing the dominant risk response in the construction project of Buildings C and D of the Kalimantan Institute of Technology. The method in this study uses Severity Index method in analyzing risk variables with the Guttman scale used to determine the relevance of a risk variable. Then do an analysis of the response to the dominant risk. In the correlation test, 40 indicators were found that were relevant and 4 that were irrelevant. The validity test shows 7 invalid indicators. The results obtained are 6 indicators of risk that are dominant to the value of the likelihood and impact matrix labelled "high" risk. The risk response in this study is to seek supervision of the budget specified in the contract, carry out reliable material estimation calculations, the procurement department is required to identify places for replacement materials, make re-engineering arrangements for work execution sequences, and depend on professional distributors and forwarders, ensuring experienced project employees, working drawings have clear information, and prioritizing outdoor work.
Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

  1. Dewantoro, B. S., & Mardiyanto, A. (2019). Manajemen Resiko Kerja pada Studi Kasus Jembatan Kali Kuto. Universitas Semarang
  2. Flanagan, R., & Norman, G. (1993). Risk Management and Construction. Blackwell Scientific
  3. Kountur, R. (2004). Metode Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi dan Tesis. Penerbit PPM
  4. Majid, M. Z. Abd., & McCaffer, R. (1997). Assessment of Work Performance of Maintenance Contractors in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(5), 91–91. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1997)13:5(91)
  5. Santosa, B. (2009). Manajemen Proyek: Konsep dan Implementasi. Graha Ilmu
  6. Sitinjak, T. J. R., & Sugiarto. (2006). LISREL (Social sciences Statistical methods Computer programs). Graha Ilmu
  7. Situmorang, R., Sari, O. L., & Saputra, A. A. I. (2022). Rencana Keselamatan Konstruksi (Studi Kasus Gedung Laboratorium Terpadu 2 Institut Teknologi Kalimantan). Compact : Spatial Development Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.35718/compact.v1i2.772
  8. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta
  9. Tampubolon, A. J. (2018). Analisa Faktor-Faktor Risiko Dominan pada Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi dengan Metode Severity Index (Studi Kasus: Proyek Apartemen Mansyur Residence). Universitas Sumatera Utara
  10. Walizer. (1987). Metode dan Analisis Penelitian. Gramedia
  11. Williams, T. M. (1993). Risk-management infrastructures. International Journal of Project Management, 11(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(93)90003-6
  12. Yuliana, C. (2017). Manajemen Risiko Kontrak Untuk Proyek Konstruksi. Rekayasa Sipil, 11(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.rekayasasipil.2017.011.01.2

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.