DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.9.2.127-141

Dampak Sektor Transportasi Terhadap Perekonomian di Timor Barat: Suatu Analisis Model Input - Output (I-O)

*Thobias Arnoldus Messakh  -  Program Studi Ilmu Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah dan Pedesaan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
Ernan Rustiadi orcid scopus  -  Divisi Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah, Departemen Ilmu Tanah dan Sumberdaya Lahan, Fakultas Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
Eka Intan Kumala Putri scopus  -  Departemen Ekonomi Sumber Daya Lingkungan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
Akhmad Fauzi orcid scopus  -  Program Studi Ilmu Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah dan Pedesaan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The development of the transportation sector on the West Timor is expected to be a driving machine in supporting other sectors, so that it will have a large multipler impact on the economy at the land borders of the country with Timor Leste. The government needs to make breakthroughs in the development of the transportation sector, because West Timor is experiencing a transportation infrastructure deficit. This is due to the low quality and quantity of transportation infrastructure capable of supporting the regional economy. This study aims to examine the impact backward and forward, as well as the multiplier impact of development on West Timor in 2018. The result of the researched was that the transportation sector in West Timor has a degree of distribution of 1.40. While the degree of sensitivity was 0.486. The multiplier effect on salaries and wages (multiplier income) is 2.069, and the impact on the total value added multiplier is 1.409. The transportation sector needs to be maximized by building intermoda connectivity of the transportation network that is more effective and efficient. It is also necessary to optimize connectivity in integrating the development phases of National, Provincial and District road sections. The network connectivity is expected to be able to encourage the production sector which is able to increase or develop production capacity, thus providing a more optimal multiplier impact in the future.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: input-output; multiplier income; the impact of the transportation sector; West Timor
Funding: Beasiswa Disertasi LPDP

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
The Relationship of Education and Regional Income Level on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from High Populated Country Dampak Sektor Transportasi Terhadap Perekonomian di Timor Barat: Suatu Analisis Model Input - Output (I-O) Nilai dan Pola Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Indeks pada Jalur Commuter Line Bogor - Jakarta Kota The Impact of Rapid Urban Growth on Potential Groundwater Pollution in Ngemplak Sub-District, Sleman District More recent articles
  1. Agbelie, B. R. D. K. (2014). An empirical analysis of three econometric frameworks for evaluating economic impacts of transportation infrastructure expenditures across countries. Transport Policy, 35, 304–310. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.06.009
  2. Alises, A., & Vassallo, J. M. (2016). The impact of the structure of the economy on the evolution of road freight transport: A macro analysis from an input-output approach. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2870–2879. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.404
  3. Amir, H dan Nugroho, A. (2019). Seri analisis kebijakan fiskal, analisis dampak kebijakan menggunakan model Computable General Equilibrium (CGE). Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  4. Anas, R., Tamin, O. Z., & Wibowo, S. S. (2015). Applying input-output model to estimate the broader economic benefits of Cipularang Tollroad Investment to Bandung District. Procedia Engineering, 125, 489–497. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.042
  5. Arianti, D. (2014). Pengaruh sektor pariwisata terhadap perekonomian dan keruangan Kota Bukittinggi (pendekatan analisis input output). Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 2(3), 183-196. doi: 10.14710/jwl.2.3.183-196
  6. Atan, S., & Arslanturk, Y. (2012). Tourism and economic growth nexus: An input output analysis in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 952–956. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.162
  7. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2010). Tabel input ouput Indonesia 2010. Badan Pusat Statistik
  8. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2018). Provinsi NTT dalam angka dan Kabupaten/Kota di Timor Barat dalam angka (Tahun 2003-2018). Badan Pusat Statistik
  9. Bappeda Nusa Tenggara Timur. (2015). Revisi Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Timur 2010-2030. Bappeda Nusa Tenggara Timur
  10. Ding, Q., Cai, W., & Wang, C. (2017). Impact of household consumption activities on energy consumption in China - Evidence from the lifestyle perspective and input-output analysis. Energy Procedia, 105, 3384–3390. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.767
  11. Ehizuelen, M. M. O. (2016). The dynamics of infrastructure and economic growth in Nigeria. Journal of Global Economics, 4(1), 1–9. doi: 10.4172/2375-4389.1000169
  12. Farhadi, M. (2015). Transport infrastructure and long-run economic growth in OECD countries. Transportation Research Part A, 74, 73–90. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.006
  13. Hilman, A. M., & Ester, A. M. (2018). Peranan sektor industri pengolahan dalam perekonomian Indonesia: Model input-output. Media Ekonomi, 26(1), 63-76. doi: 10.25105/me.v26i1.5210
  14. Holý, V., & Šafr, K. (2020). Disaggregating input-output tables by the multidimensional RAS Method. 1–17. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.07814
  15. Jhinghan, M. L. (2016). Ekonomi pembangunan dan perencanaan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  16. Kjaer, L. L., Høst-madsen, N. K., Schmidt, J. H., & Mcaloone, T. C. (2015). Application of environmental input-output analysis for corporate and product environmental footprints—learnings from three cases. Sustainability, 7(9), 11438-11461. doi: 10.3390/su70911438
  17. Kodongo, O., & Ojah, K. (2016). Does infrastructure really explain economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa ? Review of Development Finance, 6(2), 105–125. doi: 10.1016/j.rdf.2016.12.001
  18. Maparu, T. S., & Mazumder, T. N. (2017). Transport infrastructure, economic development and urbanization in India (1990–2011): Is there any causal relationship? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, 319–336. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.033
  19. Mardiantony, T., & Ciptomulyono, U. (2012). Penerapan analisis input output dan anp dalam penentuan prioritas pengembangan sub sektor industri di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 1(1), 456–459. doi: 10.12962/j23373539.v1i1.1531
  20. Meersman, H., & Nazemzadeh, M. (2017). The contribution of transport infrastructure to economic activity: The case of Belgium. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 5(2), 316–324. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2017.03.009
  21. Muryani, M & Swastika, R. B. (2018). Input-output analysis: A case study of transportation sector in Indonesia. JDE (Journal of Developing Economies), 3(2), 80-90. doi: 10.20473/jde.v3i2.9650
  22. Parikh, A. (1979). Forecasts of input-output matrices using the R.A.S. method. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(3), 477–481. doi: 10.2307/1926084
  23. Perkins, P., Fedderke, J., & Luiz, J. (2005). An analysis of economic infrastructure investment in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 73(2), 211–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1813-6982.2005.00014.x
  24. Priyarsono, D. S., Sahara, & Firdaus, M. (2007). Ekonomi Regional. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka
  25. Rustiadi, E., Saefulhakim, S., & Panuju, D. R. (2011). Perencanaan dan pengembangan wilayah. Jakarta: Crestpent Press dan Yayasan Pusataka Obor Indonesia
  26. Sauian, M. S., Kamarudin, N., & Rani, R. M. (2013). Labor productivity of services sector in Malaysia: Analysis using input-output approach. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7, 35–41. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00215-3
  27. Skorobogatova, O., & Kuzmina-Merlino, I. (2017). Transport infrastructure development performance. Procedia Engineering, 178, 319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.056
  28. Sukma, A. F. (2015). Efek pengganda infrastruktur pekerjaan umum dalam perekonomian Provinsi Bali. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 26(2), 100–110. doi: 10.5614/jpwk.2015.26.2.3
  29. Sutrisna, M. G., Sitorus, S. R. P., Widiatmaka, Marimin, & Nurwajedi. (2019). Leading sector analysis in West Kotawaringin Regency, Central Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 399(1). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012068
  30. Tian, Z., Wang, S., & Chen, B. (2019). A three-scale input-output analysis of blue and grey water footprint for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration. Energy Procedia, 158, 4049–4054. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.833
  31. Trinh, B., & Phong, N. V. (2013). A short note on RAS method. Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 3, 133–137
  32. Wang, J., & Charles, M. B. (2010). IO based impact analysis: A method for estimating the economic impacts by different transport infrastructure investments in Australia. ATRF 2010: 33rd Australasian Transport Research Forum (pp 1–24). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Transport Research Forum
  33. Widyawati, R. F. (2017). Analisis keterkaitan sektor pertanian dan pengaruhnya terhadap perekonomian Indonesia (analisis input ouput). Jurnal Economia, 13(1), 14-27. doi: 10.21831/economia.v13i1.11923
  34. Zuhdi, U., Prasetyo, A. D., & Putranto, N. A. R. (2014). Analyzing the changes of total output of Japanese livestock sector: an input – output approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 649–653. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.522

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.