DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpii.2026.32583

Analisis Safety Awareness dan Identifikasi Potensi Bahaya Menggunakan Metode HIRADC pada Proyek Perbaikan Gedung FSM UNDIP

*Kamelia Salsabila  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Aries Susanty  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Received: 15 May 2026; Revised: 12 Jun 2026; Accepted: 14 Jun 2026; Available online: 16 Jun 2026; Published: 22 Sep 2026.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Industri konstruksi memiliki tingkat risiko kecelakaan kerja yang tinggi, terutama pada pekerjaan renovasi seperti pemasangan dan penggantian kusen aluminium yang melibatkan aktivitas di ketinggian dan penggunaan alat listrik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tingkat safety awareness pekerja, mengidentifikasi potensi bahaya dengan metode Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Determining Control (HIRADC), serta merumuskan rekomendasi pengendalian risiko pada proyek perbaikan Gedung Fakultas Sains dan Matematika Universitas Diponegoro. Pendekatan deskriptif kuantitatif digunakan melalui observasi, wawancara dan kuesioner safety awareness terhadap 20 pekerja. Hasil menunjukkan tingkat kesadaran keselamatan berada pada kategori sedang (rata-rata 2,3–3,0), dengan nilai terendah pada komitmen manajemen dan perilaku aman individu. Analisis HIRADC diperoleh dari observasi dan wawancara kepada manajer proyek menemukan 14 aktivitas berisiko, dengan enam di antaranya berkategori tinggi. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya peningkatan tingkat kesadaran keselamatan seperti komitmen manajemen, pelatihan perilaku aman dan sistem pelaporan bahaya berkelanjutan terutama untuk aktivitas dengan nilai risiko tinggi berdasarkan hasil analisis HIRADC untuk memperkuat budaya “safety first” pada proyek konstruksi.

 

Kata kunci: keselamatan kerja, safety awareness, HIRADC, budaya keselamatan, konstruksi

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
  1. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. (2023). Laporan Kecelakaan Kerja 2022. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan
  2. Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of applied psychology, 94(5), 1103–1127
  3. Clarke, S. (2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: a meta-analytic review. Journal of occupational health psychology, 11(4), 315–327
  4. Fadzil, A. F., Ahmad, R., & Zainal, R. (2021). Integrating HIRARC and Safety Awareness for Behavior-Based Safety Improvement in Construction Sites. Journal of Construction Safety Research, 7(1), 11–20
  5. Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of Safety Climate and Safety Behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358
  6. Hasanah, A. F., & Diandra, N. (2024). Analisis penerapan keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (K3) sebagai pengendalian terhadap kinerja proyek konstruksi. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Cendekia, 5(1), 867–877
  7. Hasanah, N., & Diandra, P. (2024). Safety culture and productivity in renovation projects: Evidence from Central Java. Jurnal K3 dan Produktivitas, 12(1), 15–24
  8. Havold, J. I. (2010). Safety culture and safety management aboard tankers. Safety Science, 48(8), 1072–1082
  9. Hudson, P. (2007). Implementing a safety culture in a major multi-national. Safety Science, 45(6), 697–722
  10. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2023). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2023. Geneva: ILO
  11. International Labour Organization (ILO). (2023). World Statistics on Safety and Health at Work. Geneva: ILO
  12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). ISO 45001:2018 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems – Requirements with Guidance for Use. Geneva: ISO
  13. Ismail, Z. (2020). Barriers to PPE usage among construction workers. Journal of Construction Safety, 56(4), 233–241
  14. Ismail, Z., Rahmat, N., & Kassim, A. (2020). Effectiveness of HIRARC Implementation in Reducing Construction Site Accidents in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(4), 525–540
  15. Kang, D., Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2021). Safety Awareness and Compliance Behavior in Korean Infrastructure Projects. Safety Science, 137, 105183
  16. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Permenaker No. 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Lingkungan Kerja. Jakarta: Kemnaker RI
  17. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2021). Peraturan Menteri PUPR No. 10/PRT/M/2021 tentang Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Konstruksi. Jakarta: Kementerian PUPR
  18. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2002). Safety climate and safety behaviour. Australian Journal of Management, 27, 67–75
  19. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953
  20. Nguyen, H. T., Rahman, M., & Kim, D. (2023). Risk communication and hazard control in building renovation projects. International Journal of Project Safety, 9(2), 112–128
  21. Nguyen, T. H., Vo, Q., & Tran, H. (2023). Assessing Risk Perception and Safety Communication in Renovation Projects Using HIRARC Framework. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(5), 777–789
  22. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2024). Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines. U.S. Department of Labor
  23. Pinto, A., Nunes, I., & Ribeiro, R. (2021). Evaluation of HIRARC Practice in Bridge Construction Projects: Lessons Learned for Risk Control. Journal of Safety Research, 78, 123–132
  24. Pinto, A., Ribeiro, R., & Nunes, I. L. (2021). Assessing construction safety risk using HIRARC approach. Safety Science, 138, 105258
  25. Rachman, H. (2022). Implementation of Behavior-Based Safety at PT Pertamina. Industrial Safety Review
  26. Rafiq, M. (2023). Dynamic Risk Assessment in Housing Construction Using HIRARC Method. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 29(2), 157–168
  27. Rahman, M. A., Uddin, S., & Hasan, T. (2022). Risk identification and prioritization in medium-scale construction sites. Journal of Construction Engineering, 11(3), 145–156
  28. Rahman, M. Z., Yusof, N., & Che Mat, N. (2022). Impact of Periodic HIRADC on Public Building Projects’ Safety Performance. Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 19(3), 45–56
  29. Reason, J. (1997). Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Ashgate
  30. Setiawan, E., Witjaksana, B., & Tjendani, H. T. (2024). Analisis risiko manajemen pekerja bangunan proyek SMAN 5 Brawijaya Kediri. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Cendekia, 5(1), 877–886
  31. Tarwaka. (2019). Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja: Manajemen dan Implementasi di Tempat Kerja. Surakarta: Harapan Press
  32. Wibisono, A., & Suharto, S. (2021). Factors Affecting the Use of PPE among Manufacturing Workers in Indonesia. Jurnal K3L Indonesia
  33. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety Climate in Industrial Organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.