skip to main content

Reformulasi Pajak Penghasilan atas Transaksi Lintas Batas di Era Digital di Indonesia

*Henry Dianto Pardamean Sinaga orcid scopus  -  Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia, Indonesia
Nabitatus Sa’adah scopus  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Peraturan perundang-undangan tentang Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) terkait transaksi e-commerce atau perdagangan lintas batas negara secara elektronik inkonsisten yang terjadi di era digital berdampak pada hilangnya pendapatan negara dari pajak secara signifikan. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) melaporkan bahwa praktik base erosion and profit shifting telah menyebabkan hilangnya pendapatan negara setara dengan 4-10% pendapatan PPh badan global. Perlu kajian normatif yang bertujuan untuk mengkonstruksikan PPh yang berlaku atas transaksi ekonomi digital yang lintas batas di Indonesia dan untuk menghasilkan reformulasi PPh atas transaksi ekonomi digital yang lintas batas tersebut di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pertama, peraturan PPh atas transaksi ekonomi digital yang lintas batas belum mampu menghilangkan potensi penerimaan PPh yang seharusnya diterima oleh Indonesia. Kedua, reformulasi PPh atas transaksi ekonomi digital yang lintas batas di Indonesia harus menjangkau pada economic presence yang memenuhi kriteria kumulatif berupa place of business test, location test, dan right use test, yang mewajibkan terdapatnya bentuk usaha tetap (BUT) terhadap Pelaku Usaha Luar Negeri yang secara aktif melakukan kegiatan e-commerce dan/atau penawaran kepada konsumen di wilayah hukum Indonesia.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Ekonomi Digital; Pajak Penghasilan; Transaksi Lintas Batas

Article Metrics:

  1. Akbar, A. (2022). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen terhadap Kualitas Layanan Shopee. Scientium Management Review, Vol.1, (No.2), pp.9-16. https://doi.org/10.56282/smr. v1i2.124
  2. Alam, Ryan S. (2022). Analisis Strategi Bisnis di Era Digitalisasi: Suatu Studi Kasus PT. Pos Indonesia. Digital Economy and Digital Transformation Review,Vol.1,(No.1),pp.11-18. https://doi.org/10. 56282/deditr.v1i1.289
  3. Avi-Yonah, Reuven., & Kim, Young Ran. (2022). Tax Harmony: The Promise and Pitfalls of the Global Minimum Tax. Michigan Journal of International Law,Vol.43,(No.3),pp.505-556. https://doi.org/ 10.36642/mjil.43.3.tax
  4. Barus, Leo B. (2022). On Tax Obligatory and Taxpayer and Its Implications. Journal of Tax Law and Policy, Vol.1, (No.1), pp.1–10. https://doi.org/10.56282/jtlp.v1i1.59
  5. Bolifaar, Andhy H. (2022). Rekonstruksi Hukum Terhadap “Trading In Influence” dalam Membangun Pajak Yang Bebas Korupsi di Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Development Issues, Vol.1, (No.2), pp. 37-54. https://doi.org/10.56282/jsdi.v1i2.299
  6. Budiarto, Muhammad T. (2020). Penggalian Potensi Pajak para Youtuber Menggunakan Metode Web Scrapping. In Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara, Vol.2, (No.1),pp. 545-567. https://jurnal.bppk.kemenkeu.go.id/snkn/article/view/569
  7. Bukhari, M. (2022). Web Presence dalam Pertanian. Digital Economy and Digital Transformation Review,Vol.1,(No.1),pp.7-9. https://doi.org/10.56282/deditr.v1i1.233
  8. Hao, Shuang., Chen, Zhi., Wang, Chien-Chih., & Hung, Che-Yu. (2023). Impact of Digital Service Trade Barriers and Cross-Border Digital Service Inputs on Economic Growth. Sustainability, Vol.15,(No.19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914547
  9. Haryanto, Susilo. (2023). Analysis of Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion Forms (Study on Taxpayers in the Trade Sector in Makassar City). Journal of Entrepreneurship and Financial Technology,Vol.2,(No.1),pp.37-43. https://doi.org/10.56282/jeft.v2i1.407
  10. Hermawan, Anis W. (2022). On Account Deletion in Marketplace: A Justice Perspective. Scientia Business Law Review, Vol.1, (No.1),pp.7–14. https://doi.org/10.56282/sblr.v1i1.48
  11. Hermawan, Anis W., & Pramana, Yudha. (2022). Secondary Liability and Safe Harbors for Platform Providers in Indonesian E-Commerce Law. Scientium Law Review, Vol.1,(No.3),pp.101-108. https://doi.org/10.56282/slr.v1i3.335
  12. Hidayat, Yuli T., & Sinaga, Henry Dianto Pardamean. (2022). Certainty and Simplicity Principle in Broadening the Scope of Tax Audit in Indonesia. Journal of Tax Law and Policy. Vol.1,(No.1),pp.11–23. https://doi.org/10.56282/jtlp.v1i1.60
  13. Liu, Aljun., Osewe, Maurice., Shi, Yangyan., Zhen, Xiaofei., & Wu, Yanping. (2022). Cross-Border E-Commerce Development and Challenges in China: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.17, (No.1), pp.69-88. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010004
  14. Mu, Dong., Ren, Huanyu., & Wang, Chao. (2022). A Literature Review of Taxes in Cross-Border Supply Chain Modeling: Themes, Tax Types and New Trade-Offs. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.17, (No.1),pp.20-46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010002
  15. Pramana, Yudha. (2022). Legal Reconstruction on Domestic Related Party Transactions, Journal of Tax Law and Policy, Vol.1, (No.1), pp.24–41. https://doi.org/10.56282/ jtlp.v1i1.61
  16. Pramana, Yudha. & Barus, Leo. (2022). Tackling the Non-Compliance Taxpayers on Digital Economy in Indonesia: A Rational Choice Literature. Digital Economy and Digital Transformation Review, Vol.1, (No.2), pp.29-33. https://doi.org/10.56282/deditr.v1i2.320
  17. Radbruch, G. (2006a). Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy (1945). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 26, (Issue 1), pp. 13-15. DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqi042
  18. Radbruch, G. (2006b). Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.26, (Issue1),pp.1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi041
  19. Risanto., & Lubis, Arief Hakim P. (2022). Novum and Unrevealed Data in Tax Disputes in Indonesia: A Legal Certainty Perspective. Journal of Tax Law and Policy, Vol.1, (No.2), pp.17–28. https://doi.org/10.56282/jtlp.v1i2.95
  20. Sinaga, Benny Rikardo P. (2022). Video on Demand Business Competition: A Literature Review Study. Journal of Business Issues. Vol.1, (No.1), pp.33-39. https://doi.org/10.56282/jbi.v1i1.154
  21. Sinaga, Henry Dianto Pardamean. & Hermawan, Anis W. (2022). Tax Buoyancy for Sustainable Development: A Development Law Perspective in Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Development Issues, Vol.1, (No.2),pp.55-64. https://doi.org/10.56282/jsdi.v1i2.470
  22. Sinaga, Henry Dianto Pardamean. & Pramana, Yudha. (2022). Tax Elasticity in Addressing Tax Avoidance in Indonesia: A Study of Responsive Law. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Issues, Vol.1, (No.2),pp.37-42. https://doi.org/10.56282/jpapi.v1i2.471
  23. Surono., & Apriliasari, Vita. (2022). Pengaruh Pillar 1 OECD (Unified Approach) terhadap Pemajakan Digital di Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia, Vol.6, (No.2S), pp.462-471. https://doi.org/10.31092/ jpi.v6i2S.1868
  24. Wicaksono, Adi H. (2022). Managing The Risk of The Corporate Taxpayers Crimes through Deferred Prosecution Agreement in Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Financial Technology, Vol.1, (No.2), pp.21-29. https://doi.org/10.56282/jeft.v1i2.388
  25. Wirawan, Aditya., Saraswati, Retno, Sa’dah, Nabitatus, & Sinaga, Reny Yemimalina. (2022). E-Participation in The Management of Tobacco Excise Production Sharing Funds: An Initiation to Strengthen The Principles of Decentralization in Indonesia. Scientia Business Law Review, Vol.1,(No.1),pp.21–36. https://doi.org/10.56282/sblr.v1i1.50
  26. Yang, Lifan., Dong, Jiatian., & Yang, Weixin. (2024). Analysis of Regional Competitiveness of China’s Cross-Border E-Commerce. Sustainability, Vol.16,(No.3),p.1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031007
  27. United Nations. (2017). United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention between Developed and Developing Countries. New York: United Nations
  28. Gov.UK. (2020). Digital Services Tax. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/ publikations/introduction-of-the-digital-services-tax/digital-services-tax
  29. Kemenkeu. (2023). DJP Kumpulkan Pajak Digital Rp13,87 Triliun hingga 31 Juli 2023.Retrieved from https://www. kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-publik/publikasi/berita-utama/Pajak-Digital-Rp13,87-Triliun-hingga-31-Juli-2023
  30. OECD. (2023). International collaboration to end tax avoidance. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/
  31. Prakarsa. (2022). Peluang dan Tantangan Ekonomi Digital dan Potensi Pajak Digital di Indonesia. Retrieved from https://theprakarsa.org/peluang-dan-tantangan-ekonomi-digital-dan-potensi-pajak-digital-di-indonesia/
  32. Sakundiana, Vita D. (2021). Potensi Pengenaan PPh bagi Penyedia Layanan Digital Asing. Retrieved from https://www.pajak. com/pwf/potensi-pengenaan-pph-bagi-penyedia-layanan-digital-asing/

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.