DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jadu.v6i1.20736

Do Where People Interact Matters to Social Capital? Comparative Analysis of Middle- and High-Rise Public Housing

Open Innovation and Collaboration Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University, Japan

Open Access Copyright 2024 Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

As a growing country, the challenge of providing affordable housing has grown over recent years. Public housing has emerged as a leading government initiative to provide better housing alternatives, especially for low incomes. However, due to the limited land availability, public housing development has shifted from middle- to high-rise housing type. Previous studies have shown that high-rise living can have detrimental effects on low-income residents, especially regarding their social capital. This study explores the interactional spaces within both housing types, their social capital, and whether the former influences the latter. Quantitative analysis was conducted on 255 respondents in middle- and high-rise public housing for low incomes in the Jakarta Special Region, Indonesia. The results indicated some similarities as well as differences in both housing styles. Respondents in both housing types mostly interacted in corridor areas, even though the percentage was higher for the high-rise case. Moreover, while both cases lacked the same social capital indicators, the middle-rise case had a relatively better situation than its high-rise counterparts. Furthermore, it was found that interactional spaces appear to influence their social capital, and the effects were varied for both middle- and high-rise and each social capital indicator. This study concludes that the intensity of interaction within a particular space does not necessarily translate to better social capital.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Public housing; social capital; interactional spaces; social interaction; high-rise housing
Funding: JSPS KAKENHI under contract 23K13476.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Effect of Population Density and Urban Intensity on Building Typology in South Krembangan Area Do Where People Interact Matters to Social Capital? Comparative Analysis of Middle- and High-Rise Public Housing Designing A Camouflaged Pavilion in A Bird Park with Metaphor Technique through Section Plan More recent articles
  1. Andrea, E. P. (2015). Study on Impact of Urbanization and. 120. https://doi.org/10.14989/doctor.k19347
  2. Brisson, D. S., & Usher, C. L. (2005). Bonding social capital in low-income neighborhoods. In Family Relations (Vol. 54, Issue 5, pp. 644–653). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.00348.x
  3. Browne-Yung, K., Ziersch, A., & Baum, F. (2013). “Faking til you make it”: Social capital accumulation of individuals on low incomes living in contrasting socio-economic neighbourhoods and its implications for health and wellbeing. Social Science and Medicine, 85, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.026
  4. Bunawardi, R. S., Suzuki, Y., & Yuasa, H. (2016). Diversity and utilization of public space in Rusunawa Mariso, Makassar – Indonesia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 15(3), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.15.433
  5. Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2011). Social interaction in mixed-income developments: Relational expectations and emerging reality. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00537.x
  6. Danielle van der Burgt, & Katarina Gustafson. (2013). “Doing Time” and “Creating Space”: A Case Study of Outdoor Play and Institutionalized Leisure in an Urban Family. Children, Youth and Environments, 23(3), 24. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.23.3.0024
  7. El-Darwish, I. I. (2022). Enhancing outdoor campus design by utilizing space syntax theory for social interaction locations. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.06.010
  8. Evans, G. W., Wells, N. M., & Moch, A. (2003). Housing and mental health: A review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of Social Issues, 59(3), 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00074
  9. Falk, I., & Kilpatrick, S. (2000). What is social capital? A study of interaction in a rural community. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00133
  10. Flint, J., & Kearns, A. (2006). Housing, neighbourhood renewal and social capital: The case of registered social landlords in Scotland. European Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616710600585716
  11. Forrest, R., La Grange, A., & Ngai-Ming, Y. (2002). Neighbourhood in a high rise, high density city: Some observations on contemporary Hong Kong. Sociological Review, 50(2), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00364
  12. Gamero-Salinas, J., Kishnani, N., Monge-Barrio, A., López-Fidalgo, J., & Sánchez-Ostiz, A. (2021). The influence of building form variables on the environmental performance of semi-outdoor spaces. A study in mid-rise and high-rise buildings of Singapore. Energy and Buildings, 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110544
  13. Gifford, R. (2007). The consequences of living in high-rise buildings. Architectural Science Review, 50(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2007.5002
  14. Gu, N. (2020). Korean apartment complexes and social relationships of the residents. Housing Studies, 35(8), 1362–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1667491
  15. Huang, S. C. L. (2006). A study of outdoor interactional spaces in high-rise housing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.07.008
  16. Ibem, E. O., & Amole, D. (2013). Subjective life satisfaction in public housing in urban areas of Ogun State, Nigeria. Cities, 35, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.004
  17. Kalantari, S., & Shepley, M. (2021). Psychological and social impacts of high-rise buildings: a review of the post-occupancy evaluation literature. Housing Studies, 36(8), 1147–1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1752630
  18. Karsten, L. (2015). Middle-class households with children on vertical family living in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 47, 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.023
  19. Korsunova, A., Halme, M., Kourula, A., Levänen, J., & Lima-Toivanen, M. (2022). Necessity-driven circular economy in low-income contexts: How informal sector practices retain value for circularity. Global Environmental Change, 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102573
  20. Lancee, B. (2010). The economic returns of immigrants’ bonding and bridging social capital: The case of the Netherlands. International Migration Review, 44(1), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00803.x
  21. Leonard, M. (2004). Bonding and bridging social capital: Reflections from Belfast. Sociology, 38(5), 927–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504047176
  22. Malik, A., & YOSHIDA, T. (2021). A Pattern of Social Interaction of the High–Rise Public-Housing of Jatinegara Barat in Jakarta, Indonesia. Urban and Regional Planning Review, 8(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.14398/urpr.8.1
  23. Mazumdar, S., Learnihan, V., Cochrane, T., & Davey, R. (2018). The built environment and social capital: A systematic review. Environment and Behavior, 50(2), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516687343
  24. Meilasari-Sugiana, A., Ayu, D., Sari, P., & Anggraini, R. (2018). Housing and resettlement of Jakarta’s urban poor: case study of Kampung Pulo’s slum revitalisation in Jakarta, Indonesia. www.humangeographies.org.ro
  25. Mullenbach, L. E., Larson, L. R., Floyd, M. F., Marquet, O., Huang, J. H., Alberico, C., Scott Ogletree, S., & Aaron Hipp, J. (2022). Cultivating social capital in diverse, low-income neighborhoods: The value of parks for parents with young children. Landscape and Urban Planning, 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104313
  26. Muzayanah, I. F. U., Nazara, S., Mahi, B. R., & Hartono, D. (2020). Is there social capital in cities? The association of urban form and social capital formation in the metropolitan cities of Indonesia. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 24(4), 532–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1730934
  27. Nakano, S., & Washizu, A. (2021). Will smart cities enhance the social capital of residents? The importance of smart neighborhood management. Cities, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103244
  28. Nazarpour, M. T., & Norouzian-Maleki, S. (2021). A comparative study of satisfaction evaluation between students of mid-rise and high-rise student housing. Facilities, 39(7–8), 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-06-2020-0064
  29. Nguyen, L., van den Berg, P., Kemperman, A., & Mohammadi, M. (2020). Where do people interact in high-rise apartment buildings? Exploring the influence of personal and neighborhood characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134619
  30. Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The american, 4
  31. Ridwana, R., Prayitno, B., & Utomo Hatmoko, A. (2018). The Relationship Between Spatial Configuration and Social Interaction in High-Rise Flats: A Case Study On The Jatinegara Barat in Jakarta. SHS Web of Conferences, 41, 07003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184107003
  32. Sullivan, G. B., & Sagala, S. (2020). Quality of life and subjective social status after five years of Mount Sinabung eruptions: Disaster management and current sources of inequality in displaced, remaining and relocated communities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 49(October 2019), 101629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101629
  33. Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. In International Journal of Epidemiology (Vol. 33, Issue 4, pp. 650–667). https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh013
  34. Tang, S., Lee, H. F., & Feng, J. (2022). Social capital, built environment and mental health: A comparison between the local elderly people and the “laopiao” in urban China. Ageing and Society, 42(1), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X2000077X
  35. Title: Improving the Social Sustainability of High-rises. (2014). www.ansaluniversity.edu.in
  36. Van, H., & Hardi, J. (2017). Pola Pemanfaatan Ruang Bersama pada Rusunawa Jatinegara Barat. Vitruvian; Jurnal Arsitektur, Bangunan, Dan Lingkungan, 6(3), 133–142
  37. Won, J., & Lee, J. S. (2020). Impact of residential environments on social capital and health outcomes among public rental housing residents in Seoul, South Korea. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103882
  38. Yang, T. C., Chen, I. C., Kim, S., & Choi, S. won. (2018). Differential investments and opportunities: How do neighborhood conditions moderate the relationship between perceived housing discrimination and social capital? Social Science Research, 72, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.01.008
  39. Zhang, W. (2022). Social capital, income and subjective well-being: evidence in rural China. Heliyon, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08705

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.