DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.3.1.19-31

Urban Slum Upgrading Policy In Jakarta (Case Study: Kampung Deret Program Implementation)

*Alfian Nurdiansyah  -  Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing, Indonesia
Received: 28 Aug 2017; Published: 28 Feb 2018.
Editor(s): Sri Rum Giyarsih

Citation Format:
Abstract

For several decades, Jakarta has witnessed massive urbanization that leads to urban slum problems. The problems have always been associated with urban kampung, the informal neighborhood which grows and tends to be more impoverished over times. The local government has implemented the Kampung Improvement Program (KIP) to reduce the problems. The program which included sites-and-services program, and resettlement policy was not entirely successful to overcome slum problems. In 2013, the Governor of Jakarta launched Kampung Deret Program (KDP) as an alternative to the on-site slum upgrading policy. However, the KDP was eventually postponed and removed from the local budget plan of Jakarta Province in 2015 due to some problems in the implementation. This article is aimed at explaining the effectiveness of the KDP program and analyzing alternative strategies for effective policy implementation of KDP. This study uses quantitative methods by applying observation, interview and documentation to collect the primary and secondary data. Petogogan and Pasar Minggu in South Jakarta were selected as cases. The study shows that there are technical difficulties faced by the authorities during the implementation of KDP. KDP Petogogan was quite successful comparing to the KDP Pasar Minggu in terms of installed housing, basic infrastructures-facilities, and security of tenure. The implementation was quite successful due to the application of some form of equal approaches which were based on the characteristic of policy object and the slum dwellers in every selected slum. Following the approach, KDP was implemented under three packages: KDP I, KDP II, and KDP III. It was finally found that the KDP packages were considered as an effective on-site slum upgrading policy that can minimize resistance and maximize participation from the slum dwellers.

 

 

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: policy implementation; slum upgrading policy; urban slum
Funding: Ministry of Public Works and Housing

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
  1. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK) Republik Indonesia. (2014). Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK atas LK Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta TA 2013. Retrieved from http://jakarta.bpk.go.id/?p=3430
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2013). Evaluasi RW Kumuh di Provinsi DKI Jakarta Tahun 2013. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Provinsi DKI Jakarta. (2015). Statistik Daerah Provinsi DKI Jakarta 2015. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi DKI Jakarta
  4. Cybriwsky, R., & Ford, L. R. (2001). City profile Jakarta. Cities, 18(3), 199–210. doi: 10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00004-X
  5. Dinas Perumahan dan Gedung Pemda (DPGP) DKI Jakarta. (2010). Ekstrim Di DKI Jakarta. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://jakarta.go.id/storage/app/.../5a7015c61b689243794094.pdf
  6. Dinas Perumahan dan Gedung Pemda (DPGP) DKI Jakarta. (2013a). Master Plan Penataan Kampung Deret 2013 (RW.03 dan RW 05, Kelurahan Petogogan). Jakarta
  7. Dinas Perumahan dan Gedung Pemda (DPGP) DKI Jakarta. (2013b). Perencanaan dan Pendampingan Penataan Kampung Deret 2013. Jakarta
  8. Dinas Perumahan dan Gedung Pemda (DPGP) DKI Jakarta. (2013c). Site Plan: Penataan Kampung Deret di RW 5 Kelurahan Petogogan, Kebayoran Baru. Jakarta
  9. Dinas Perumahan dan Gedung Pemda (DPGP) DKI Jakarta. (2013d). Sosialisasi: Bantuan Perbaikan Rumah di Permukiman Kumuh Melalui Penataan Kampung. Jakarta
  10. Firman, T. (2004). New town development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region: A perspective of spatial segregation. Habitat International, 28(3), 349–368. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00037-7
  11. Hanekom, S. X. (1987). Public Policy: Framework and Instrument for Action. Pretoria: Macmillan South Africa Ltd
  12. Harjoko, T. Y. (2009). Urban acupuncture: An alternative purposive intervention to urban development to generate sustainable positive ripples for “aided self-help” Kampung Improvement, 163–172
  13. Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles & Policy Subsystems (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  14. Lisniari, T. (2013). Menuju kota layak huni bagi semua. KIPRAH, 58, 2013. Retrieved from http://kiprah.pu.go.id/assets/uploads/magazine/58/files/assets/downloads/page0003.pdf
  15. Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242
  16. Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1981a). Effective Policy Implementation (Policy Studies Organization series). (D. A. Mazmanian & P. A. Sabatier, Eds.). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
  17. Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1981b). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. In D. A. Mazmanian & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Effective policy implementation (pp. 3–35). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
  18. Mccarthy, P. (2003). Urban Slums Report: The Case of Jakarta. Ontario, Canada
  19. McLeod, R., & Mullard, K. (2006). Bridging the Finance Gap in Housing and Infrastructure. London: ITDG Publishing
  20. Nina, N. (2011). The influence of displacement to the success of sustainable multi-storey housing development for low-income society in urban area (Case study: Multi-storey housing in Jakarta). International Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 5(10). Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edscqv&AN=edscqv.41411587&scope=site
  21. Palumbo, D. J., & Harder, M. A. (1981). Implementing Public Policy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
  22. Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. London: University of California Press
  23. Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (1982). Bureaucracy and policy implementation. Georgetown-Ontario: The Dorsey Press
  24. Sabatier, P. A. (2008). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1986), 21–48. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00003846
  25. Steinberg, F. (2007). Jakarta: Environmental problems and sustainability. Habitat International, 31(3–4), 354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.06.002
  26. Suditu, B., & Vâlceanu, D. G. (2013). Informal settlements and squatting in Romania: Socio-spatial patterns and typologies. Human Geographies, 7(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2013.72.65
  27. Tunas, D., & Peresthu, A. (2010). The self-help housing in Indonesia: The only option for the poor? Habitat International, 34(3), 315–322. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.007
  28. UN-Habitat. (2003). The Challenge of Slums - Global Report on Human Settlements 2003. Earthscan Publications on behalf of UN-Habitat. London: Earthscan
  29. UN-Habitat. (2008). Quick Guides for Policy Makers 1: Urbanization The Role The Poor Play in Urban Development. Bangkok, Thailand & Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) and United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT)
  30. Viloria, J. (1991). Indonesia’s community infrastructure programs. In The Urban Poor and Basic Infrastructure Service in Asia and the Pacific (Vol. III). Manila: Asia Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.ircwash.org/resources/urban-poor-and-basic-infrastructure-services-asia-and-pacific-regional-seminar-report

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.