Observing pro-environmental behavior based on consumer attitudes and norms

*Jati Waskito orcid  -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
I Imronudin  -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
C Chuzaimah  -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
Received: 26 Aug 2019; Published: 31 Dec 2019.
Open Access Copyright 2019 Diponegoro International Journal of Business
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: EN
Statistics: 200 211

This study aims to investigate the differences in underlying psychological aspects regarding pro-environmental  behavior between two distinct consumer groups: green product  and non-green product consumers. Psychological aspects investigated includes cognitive attitude, affective attitude, social norm, and behavioral intention. Using survey, a total of 276 responses from Solo, Jogyakarta, and Semarang are succesfully collected. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to check the measurement model, while a multiple regression and MANOVA were performed to examine the proposed hypothesis. Compared to non-green product consumers, green product consumers exhibited significantly higher levels of cognitive attitude, affective attitude, social norm, personal norm, and green consumer behavior. Also cognitive, affective attitude, and personal norm predicted green consumer behavior. The limitations of this study include the self-reporting questionnare and the measurmenet of consumers’ recycling intention rather than their actual behavior.

Keywords: pro-environmental behavior; cognitive attitude; affective attitude; social norm; and behavioral intention

Article Metrics:

  1. Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K. and Huylenbroeck, G.V. (2009), “Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review”, British Food Journal, Vol. 111 No. 10, pp. 1140-67.
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975), “Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research”, 129-385, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  3. Ajzen, I. and Madden, T. (1986), “Predictions of goal-directed behaviour: attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 453-74.
  4. Bamberg, S. and Mo¨ser, G. (2007), “Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 14-25.
  5. Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M. and Blo¨baum, A. (2007), “Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportatio n: two field studies”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 190-203.
  6. Biddle, BJ (1986), “Recent development in role theory”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 12, pp. 67-92.
  7. Bonini, SMJ, Hintz, G. and Mendonca, LT (2008), “Addressing consumer concerns about climate change”, McKinsey Quarterly, available at www.mckinseyquarterly.com /Strategy/Strategic Thinking/Addressing consumer concerns about climate Change 2115 (accessed 25 March 2011).
  8. Burns, DJ and Neisner, L. (2006), “Customer satisfaction in a retail setting: the contribution of emotion”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 49-66.
  9. de Groot, J. and Steg, L. (2007), “Genera l beliefs and the theory of planned behavior: the role of environmental concerns in the TPB”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 37 No. 8, pp. 1817-36.
  10. Eagly, AH, Mladinic, A. and Otto, S. (1994), “Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 113-37.
  11. Eagly, A. H., Kulesa, P., Brannon, L. A., Shaw, K., & Hutson -Comeaux, S. (2000). “Why counter attitudinal messages are as memorable as proattitudinal messages: The importance of active defense against attack”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1392-1408.
  12. Fielding, KS, McDonald, R. and Louis, WR (2008), “Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 318-26.
  13. Fujii, S. (2006), “Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intention”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 262-8
  14. Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., Vlek, C., 2002. Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior 34, 335–360.
  15. Gilg, A., Barr, S. and Ford, N. (2005), “Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer”, Futures, Vol. 37 No. 6, pp. 481-504.
  16. Hansen, T. (2005), “Adoption of online grocery buying: a discriminant analysis”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 101-21.
  17. Hunter, GL (2006), “The role of anticipated emotion, desire, and intention in the relationship between image and shopping center visits”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Manajemen, Vol. 34 No. 10, pp. 709-21.
  18. Jackson, T. (2005), “Motivating sustainable consumption: a review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change”. London: Sustainable Development Research Network. Available at: http://www.sd-research.org.uk/wp-content/uploads /motivatingscfinal_000.pdf
  19. Kaiser, FG, Oerke, B. and Bogner, FX (2007), “Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 242-51.
  20. Kaiser, FG, Wolfing, S. and Fuhrer, U. (1999), “Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
  21. Kidwell, B. and Jewell, RD (2008), “The influence of past behavior on behavioral intent: an information processing-processing explanation”, Journal of Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 12, pp. 1151-66.
  22. Kok, R., Benders, R.M.J., Moll, H.C., 2006. Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input–output energy analysis: a comparison of methods and a discussion of results. Energy Policy 34, 2744–2761.
  23. Ohtomo, S. and Hirose, Y. (2007), “The dual-process of reactive and inte ntional decision-making involved in eco-friendly behavior”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 117-25.
  24. Osterhus, T.L. (1997), “Pro-social consumer influence strategies: when and how do they work?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 No. 4, pp. 16-29.
  25. Piercy, NF and Nikala, L. (2009), “Corporate social responsibility: Impacts on strategic marketing and customer value”, The Marketing Review, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 335-60
  26. Rosenhan, D. L., Salovey, P., & Hargis, K. (1981). The Joys of Helping. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 40,899-905
  27. Schultz, W.P., Oskamp, S., 1996. Effort as a moderator of the attitude-behaviour relationship: general environmental concern and recycling. Social PsychologyQuarterly 59, 375–383.
  28. Schwartz, SH (1977), “Normative influences on altruism”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 222-79.
  29. Seock, YK. and Lin, C. (2011), “Cultural influence on loyalty tendency and evaluation of retail store attributes: an analysis of Taiwanese and American consumers”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 94-113.
  30. Smith, SM, Haugtvedt, CP and Petty, RE (1994), “Attitudes and recycling: Does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction?” Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 359-74.
  31. Snelgar, RS (2006), “Egoistic, altruistic and biospheric environmental concern: measurement and structure”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 87-99.
  32. Steg, L. and Vlek, C. (2009), “Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda”, Journal of Environmental Psychological, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 309-17.
  33. Stern, PC (2000), “Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior”, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 407-24.
  34. Stern, PC, Dietz, T. and Guagnano, G. (1995), “The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context”, Environment and Behavior, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 723-43.
  35. Thøgersen, J. and O¨lander, F. (2003), “Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 225-36.
  36. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2010), “Assessing the environmental impacts of consumption and production: priority products and materials”, available at:www.unep.org/ resource panel /documents/pdf/Priority Products and Materials_ Report_ Full.pdf (accessed 24 February 2011).
  37. Van Lange, P.A.M., Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R.M., Ruiter, R.A., 1998. A social dilemma analysis of commuting preferences: the roles of social value orientations and trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28, 796–820
  38. Vayda, Andrew P. (1988). “Actions and Cconsequences as objects of explanation in human ecology. Environment, Technology, and Society 51:2-7.
  39. Vining, J. and Ebreo, A. (1992), “Predicting recycling behaviours from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 20, pp. 1580-607
  40. Webb, DJ, Mohr, LA and Harris, KE (2008), “A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 91-8.
  41. Whitmarsh, L. and O'Neill, S. (2010), “Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviors”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 30 No. 10, pp. 305-14.
  42. Williams, J., Memery, J., Megicks, P. and Morrison, M. (2010), “Ethics and social responsibility in Australian grocery shopping”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 297-316.