skip to main content

Manipulation of financial statement reporting has an impact on financial information and affects company value

Management Study Program and Master of Management Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Pamulang University, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2025 Diponegoro International Journal of Business under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of manipulation of financial statement reporting on firm value, as well as the consequences of financial statement information on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This research uses quantitative associative, the sampling technique used is purposive sampling. The sample size for this study was determined based on criteria obtained from 105 property and real estate industry companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange within 5 years. The analysis techniques used include descriptive statistical analysis, panel data regression test, classical assumption test, and path analysis. The results showed that external pressures strongly influence financial statement reporting manipulation, emphasizing the need for organizations to overcome these pressures through alternative financing options. Industry characteristics also play an important role in the occurrence of manipulation, while rationalization and capability have minimal effects. In addition, external pressure, industry characteristics, rationalization, and capability jointly affect financial statement manipulation. Surprisingly, financial statement manipulation or fraud does not have a significant impact on firm value, as signaling theory explains its negative impact on investor confidence and stock prices. This study found that external pressure and industry dynamics play an important role in the incidence of report manipulation, while rationalization and capability.
Fulltext
Keywords: Financial statement reporting manipulation; financial statement information; firm value

Article Metrics:

  1. ACFE. (2020). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. ACFE Indonesia Chapter
  2. Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C., & Albrecht, C. C. (2008). Current trends in fraud and its detection. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 17(1), 2–12
  3. Aprian, F. H., & Fauzi, A. (2023). The Effect of Financial Stability, Nature of Industry and Total Accrual on Fraudulent Financial Statements. Journal Of Management, Accounting, General Finance And International Economic Issues (MARGINAL), 2(2), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.55047/marginal.v2i2.578
  4. Ardiyani, S., & Sri Utaminingsih, N. (2015). Analisis Determinan Financial Statement Melalui Pendekatan Fraud Triangle. Accounting Analysis Journal, 4(1)
  5. Arles, L. (2014). Predator vs Accidental Fraudster Diamond theory Refleksi Teori Fraud Triangle (Klasik). Papper Ilmiah, 1212171015
  6. Artana, I. K. P., Diatmika, I. P. G., & Atmadja, A. T. (2023). The Influence of Auditor Opinion, Company Size, External Pressure on Fraud Financial Reporting with Industrial Conditions as Intervening Variables. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 7(1), 208–215
  7. Asih, P. N. W., & Sunaryanto, S. (2022). Determinan Academic Dishonesty Behaviour Mahasiswa Akuntansi Dalam Online Exams: Perspektif Fraud Pentagon Dan Test Anxiety. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 5(2), 236–255
  8. Aulia, H. (2018). Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Potensi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan
  9. Clinard, M. B., & Cressey, D. R. (1954). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. American Sociological Review, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2087778
  10. Dalnial, H., Kamaluddin, A., Sanusi, Z. M., & Khairuddin, K. S. (2014). Accountability in Financial Reporting: Detecting Fraudulent Firms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.011
  11. Dsikowitzky, L., Hagemann, L., Dwiyitno, Ariyani, F., Irianto, H. E., & Schwarzbauer, J. (2017). Complex organic pollutant mixtures originating from industrial and municipal emissions in surface waters of the megacity Jakarta—an example of a water pollution problem in emerging economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(35). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0164-2
  12. Faradiza, S. A. (2019). Fraud pentagon dan kecurangan laporan keuangan. EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1–22
  13. Faradiza, S. A., & Suyanto, S. (2017). Fraud Diamond: Pendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Terapan| SENASSET, 196–201
  14. Fauziah, N., Kurniawan, A. W., Nurman, Anwar, & Amin, A. M. (2023). Financial Performance Analysis Using Economic Value Added (EVA) and Financial Value Added (FVA) at PT. Astra International Tbk 2017-2021 Period. Journal of Management, Accounting, General Finance and International Economic Issues, 2(2), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.55047/marginal.v2i2.612
  15. Febriani, D., Cahyati, A. D., Putri, A., & Susanti, N. L. (2022). Determinants of Financial Statement Fraud in Perspective Hexagon Fraud Theory. Basic and Applied Accounting Research Journal, 2(2), 62–77
  16. Fikri, M. K. (2017). Mengkaji Pendeteksian Financial Statement Fraud melalui Pendekatan Faktor Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, dan Capability dalam Perspektif Analisis Fraud Diamond. Tidak Dipublikasikan, 2 (1), 11–22
  17. Fuadin, A. (2017). Analisis fraud diamond dan ukuran perusahaan dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan (financial statement fraud)
  18. Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square (PLS) (4th ed.). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro
  19. Hamdani, R., & Albar, A. R. (2016). Internal controls in fraud prevention effort: A case study. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 20(2), 127
  20. Herman, L. A. (2013). Pengaruh keadilan organisasi dan sistem pengendalian intern terhadap kecurangan (studi empiris pada kantor cabang utama bank pemerintah di Kota Padang). Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(1)
  21. Huang, G. (2006). The determinants of capital structure: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 17(1), 14–36
  22. Ijudien, D. (2018). Pengaruh Stabilitas Keuangan, Kondisi Industri, dan Tekanan Eksternal Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 2(1), 82–97
  23. Istikhoroh, S., Sukandani, Y., Lasiyono, U., Utomo, S. P., & Ac, E. A. (2021). Financial Target, External Pressure, and Ineffective Monitoring: How Do The Impacts On Financial Statement Fraud? Saudi Journal of Economis and Finance, 5(9), 354–360
  24. Masitah, D. (2024). Analysis of the Effect of Fraud Pentagon on Financial Statement Fraud Using M-Score and F-Score. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 25(4), 10–21070
  25. Maulida, M., Rahmazaniati, L., Vonna, S. M., Mahdani, S., & Fatmayanti, F. (2024). Pendeteksian financial statement fraud menggunakan fraud hexagon pada perusahaan yang terindeks idxbumn20. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 9(1), 60–76
  26. Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Skinner, D. J. (2007). Earnings momentum and earnings management. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(2), 249–284
  27. Nuha, N., Ambarwati, S., & Lysandra, S. (2021). Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Sektor Industri Barang Konsumsi Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2017-2019). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Pancasila (JIAP), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35814/jiap.v1i1.2026
  28. Nuraini, R. I. (2019). The effect of financial stability, external pressure, and ineffective monitoring of fraudulent financial statement. 1st International Conference on Applied Economics and Social Science (ICAESS 2019), 327–331
  29. Nurbaiti, A., & Cipta, A. T. (2022). Fraud hexagon untuk mendeteksi indikasi financial statement fraud. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(10), 2977–2990
  30. PEPRAH, W. K. (2018). Predictive Relationships among the Elements of the Fraud Diamond Theory: The Perspective of Accountants. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v8-i3/4547
  31. Permatasari, D., & Laila, U. (2021). Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Analisis Fraud Diamond Di Perusahaan Manufaktur. AKUNTABILITAS, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.29259/ja.v15i2.13025
  32. Prakoso, D. B., & Setiyorini, W. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond terhadap Indikasi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi pada Perusahaan Perkebunan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2019). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 7(2), 48–61
  33. Priantinah, D. (2009). Manajemen Laba Ditinjau Dari Sudut Pandang Oportunistik dan Efisien Dalam Positive Accounting Theory. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(1)
  34. Prihatini, D. (2021). Perspektif Pentagon Fraud Theory Dalam Analisis Pengaruh Dampak Elemennya Terhadap Fraud Laporan Keuangan Pada IDX BUMN 20 Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2017-2020. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 5(3), 2673–2693
  35. Putri, I. A. S., & Suprasto, B. (2016). Pengaruh Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan dan Mekanisme Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 15(1), 667–694
  36. Putri, Y. E., & Suryani, E. (2024). Determinan Faktor-Faktor Capability sebagai Perspektif Fraud Diamond terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 8(1), 402–413
  37. Rasiman, R., & Rachbini, W. (2018). Fraud Diamond dan Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan Food and Beverage di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Perpajakan (JRAP), 5(02). https://doi.org/10.35838/jrap.v5i02.185
  38. Rengganis, R. R. M. Y. D., Sari, M. M. R., Budiasih, I., Wirajaya, I. G. A., & Suprasto, H. B. (2019). The fraud diamond: element in detecting financial statement of fraud. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(3), 1–10
  39. Riskiani, H., & Yanto, Y. (2020). Pengaruh Financial Stability, Ukuran Perusahaan, Kondisi Industri Terhadap Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan yang Bergerak dibidang Keuangan yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2018-2019. Jurnal Rekognisi Akuntansi, 4(2), 101–116
  40. Ruankaew, T. (2016). Beyond the fraud diamond. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research (IJBMER), 7(1), 474–476
  41. Rustiarini, N. W., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Why people commit public procurement fraud? The fraud diamond view. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(4), 345–362
  42. Safiq, M., & Seles, W. (2019). The effects of external pressures, financial targets and financial distress on financial statement fraud. 5th Annual International Conference on Accounting Research (AICAR 2018), 57–61
  43. Sihombing, K. (2016). Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud : Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (bei) Tahun 2013-2015. JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-3/1823
  44. Sihombing, K. S., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Analisis fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud: studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2010-2012 (Vol. 3, Issue 2). Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis
  45. Sihombing, P. H. I., & Manda, G. S. (2017). Pengaruh Stabilitas Keuangan Dan Tekanan Eksternal Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Competitive Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(2), 51–57
  46. Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  47. Skousen, C. J., & Twedt, B. J. (2009a). Fraud in emerging markets: A cross country analysis. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16, 301–316
  48. Skousen, C. J., & Twedt, B. J. (2009b). Fraud score analysis in emerging markets. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600910977373
  49. Suryani, A., & Herianti, E. (2015). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan terhadap Koefisen Respon Laba dan Manajemen Laba (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVIII. Medan, (September)
  50. Tugas, F. C. (2012). A Comparative Analysis of the Financial Ratios of Listed Firms Belonging to the Education Subsector in the Philippines for the Years 2009-2011. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(21)
  51. Utami, A. L., Sumarno, M., & Fanani, B. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Triangle terhadap Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun periode 2014-2017. Permana: Jurnal Perpajakan, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 9(1)
  52. Wilantari, N. M., & Ariyanto, D. (2022). Determinan Fraud Hexagon Theory dan Indikasi Financial Statement Fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(1), 87–103
  53. Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(04)00065-X
  54. Yulianti, Y., Sari, R. N., Santoso, A., Ekdjaja, M., & Rorlen, R. (2024). Financial Statement Fraud Detection: The Hexagon Fraud Model Approach. Atestasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 7(1), 674–686
  55. Zulaikha, Z., & Hadiprajitno, P. T. B. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Procurement Fraud: Sebuah Kajian Dari Perspektif Persepsian Auditor Eksternal. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2016.11

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.