skip to main content

Urgensi Penerapan Dan Prosedural Sistem Hague Pada Desain Industri Di Indonesia

*Diyah Anggun Febriyanti orcid  -  Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Dewi Maulina  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Febriyana Febriyana  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Aura Maria Alyieva Artakumara  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2025 Diponegoro Private Law Review

Citation Format:
Abstract

Industrial design plays a central role in driving the global economy, including in Indonesia. The Hague System plays a key role in ensuring that industry in Indonesia moves towards more sustainable business practices. In an effort to improve the quality and competitiveness of local products, the implementation and procedures of the Hague System are becoming increasingly important. The Hague system provides legal certainty for industrial design owners in Indonesia and is a tool for adding high value to the industrial economy. The Hague system can support the growth of the industrial design sector, but to date the Hague system has not been fully implemented in Indonesia and has not even ratified the Hague system. The Hague system must be in line with national policies in the field of industry and intellectual property rights. If there is no harmony, the implementation of the Hague System may not have the maximum impact on industrial development in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach. Overall, the implementation and procedures of the Hague System have an undeniable urgency in advancing industrial design in Indonesia. By creating a legal environment that supports innovation, provides certainty for design owners, and encourages curiosity, the Hague System is an important foundation for the positive development of the design industry sector in the country. Therefore, the hague system must immediately be introduced into industrial design in Indonesia considering that there are many great benefits to be gained, while having to take into account more of the obstacles that will occur in the future.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Hague System, Industrial Design, International Protection
  1. Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika
  2. Andrieansjah, S. T., & SH, M. (2021). Hak Desain Industri Berdasarkan Penilaian Kebaruan Desain Industri. Penerbit Alumni
  3. Arliman, L. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Karya Desain Industri Di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica Volume, 15(2)
  4. Dewi Sulistianingsih, & Bagas Bilowo Nurtyantyono Satata (2019). Dilema dan Problematik Desain Industri di Indonesia. Jurnal Suara Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 1, Maret 2019
  5. Diantha, I. M. P., & Sh, M. S. (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Prenada Media
  6. Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris
  7. Hidayat, A. (2021). Critical Review Buku “Penelitian Hukum” Peter Mahmud Marzuki Penelitian Hukum Ad Quemtentang Norma. YUSTISIA MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 7(2), 117-125
  8. INTA Designs Committee (2021). The Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs, New York: INTA Designs Committe
  9. Jonaedi Efendi, S. H. I., Johnny Ibrahim, S. H., & Se, M. M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media
  10. Kariodimedjo Dina. (2010). Perlindungan Hak Cipta, Hak Terkait, Dan Desain Industri. Mimbar Hukum, 22(2)
  11. Kenfox ip & law office (2021). The Hague System: How it Can Benefit Industrial Design Registration, Vietnam: kenfox ip & law office
  12. Moleong, L. J., & Edisi, P. R. R. B. (2004). Metodelogi penelitian. Bandung: Penerbit Remaja Rosdakarya, 3(01)
  13. Muhamad Djumhana (2004). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Desain Industri Di Indonesia, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti
  14. Muyassar Nugroho (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Desain Industri Eco Bottle Terhadap Tindakan Pemalsuan (Studi Perbandingan Dengan Amerika Serikat). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP) Vol. 6, No. 1 Januari 2022
  15. Noerhadi, Cita Citrawinda. (2013). The Weak Aspects of the Industrial Design Protection System in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 2(3)
  16. Purnamawati Vivin. (2017). Benefits And Challenges Of Adopting The Hague System Into Indonesia’s Industrial Design Registration System, Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta,
  17. Ranti Fauza Mayana (2004). Perlindungan Desain Industri Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia
  18. Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat
  19. Sukhapinda Kitisri (2019). The Hague Agreement Overview and Benefits Intellectual Property Attaché.Thailand: USPTO
  20. Supasti Dharmawan, N., & Mas Aryani, N. (2012). Keberadaan Regulasi Desain Industri Berkaitan Dengan Perlindungan Hukum Atas Karya Desain Di Bali. Kertha Patrika, 33(1)
  21. Ushiki Riichi, 2004. Legal Protection of Industrial Designs, Japan : Japan Patent Office
  22. WIPO, 1995. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, Geneva: WIPO Publication
  23. WIPO, 2001. WIPO Industrial Property Handbook: Policy, Law, and Use, Geneva: WIPO Publication
  24. WIPO, 2010. Industrial Designs and The Hague Agreement: An Introduction, Geneva: WIPO Publication, No.429 E
  25. WIPO, The Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs, Geneva: WIPO Publication, No. 911 E
  26. World Intellectual Property Organization. The Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs, Geneva: WIPO Publication
  27. Zico Armanto Mokoginta (2017). Perlindungan Hukum atas Desain Industri berdasarkan Undang - Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2000 tentang Desain Industri. Lex Privatum Vol. V/No. 5/Jul/2017

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.