skip to main content

NONET AND SELZNICK’S RESPONSIVE LAW CONCEPT IN A HISTORICAL PHILOSOPHY PERSPECTIVE

*Agam Ibnu Asa  -  PhD Student in Legal Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Misnal Munir  -  Department of Western Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Rr. Siti Murti Ningsih  -  Department of Western Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 CREPIDO under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
The responsive laws of Nonet and Selznick's thinking became one of the results of conceptual ideas about the laws that are elaborated periodically. The development of responsive law may be less comprehensive when it has not been found the historical fundamental aspects on which it is focused. It is thus important to study the concept of Nonet and Selznick's responsive legal philosophically. The method in this research is the philosophical method. The results of this study include: first, the development of law in Nonet and Selznick's view is divided into three periods of repressive law, autonomous law, and responsive law. Second, Nonet and Selznick's responsive law when reviewed in historical perspective gained an understanding that responsive law exists from a constantly creative legal subject by looking at legal issues and realities in an increasingly complex society, and responsive law is a law that has always served as part of cultural dynamics.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Philosophy; Responsive Law; Justice
Funding: https://www.ugm.ac.id/

Article Metrics:

  1. Bakker Anton dan Zubair, A.C, Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1990
  2. Kusuma Mahmud, Menyelami Hukum Progresif:Terapi Paradigmatik Bagi Lemahnya Hukum di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Antonylib, 2009
  3. Nonet Philippe and Philip Selznick, Diterj. Raisul Muttaqien dari Toward Responsive Law: Law and Society in Transition ke (Hukum Responsif Philippe Nonet dan Philip Selznick), Bandung: Penerbit Nusa Media, 2008
  4. Nonet Philippe dan Philip Selznick, Toward Responsive Law: Law and Society in Transition. London and New York: Routledge, 2017
  5. Sartini, Laporan Penelitian: Inventarisasi Tokoh dan Pemikiran Tentang Perkembangan Kebudayaan, Yogyakarta: Fakultas Filsafat UGM, 2011
  6. Toynbee Arnold, An Historian’s Approach to Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954
  7. Toynbee Arnold, Vol I-X, A Study of History, London: Oxford University Press, 1956
  8. Ahmadi, Kontroversi Penerapan Hukum: Telaah Sintesa Hukum Represif, Hukum Otonom dan Hukum Responsif, Jurnal, Al-Adl Vol. 9, No. 1, 2016
  9. Arianto Henry, Hukum Responsif dan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Lex Jurnalica, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2010
  10. Asa Agam Ibnu, Pendidikan Menurut Ki Hadjar Dewantara dan Driyarkara, Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter UNY Yogyakarta, Vol. IX, No. 2, 2019. Bakker, A dan Zubair, A.C, Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1990
  11. Hasanah Hasyim, Hermeneutik Ontologis-Dialektis-Georg Gadamer (Produksi Makna Wayang Sebagai Metode Dakwah Sunan Kalijogo), Jurnal At-Taqaddum, Vol.9, No.1, 2017
  12. Munir Misnal, Messianisme dalam Perspektif Filsafat Sejarah, Jurnal Filsafat UGM, Vol.36, No.1, 2004
  13. Sulaiman, Hukum Responsif: Hukum Sebagai Institusi Sosial Melayani Kebutuhan Sosial dalam Masa Transisi (Responsive Law: Law as a Social Institution to Servive of Social Need in Transition), Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, Vol. 9, No. 2, Cet. 2014
  14. Asa Agam Ibnu, Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Mewujudkan Keadilan Substansial dalam Perspektif Hukum Responsif Philippe Nonet dan Philip Selznick (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 45/PHPU.D-VIII/2010, Yogyakarta: Tesis Filsafat Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2020

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.