Implikasi Keberadaan Hutan Negara terhadap Perkembangan Desa di Kecamatan Segah Kabupaten Berau Provinsi Kalimantan Timur

Sitti Hadijah; Ernan Rustiadi; Endriatmo Soetarto

doi:10.14710/tataloka.23.3.320-328

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.23.3.320-328

Implikasi Keberadaan Hutan Negara terhadap Perkembangan Desa di Kecamatan Segah Kabupaten Berau Provinsi Kalimantan Timur

*Sitti Hadijah - Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

Ernan Rustiadi - Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

Endriatmo Soetarto - Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{tataloka5391,
    author = {Sitti Hadijah and Ernan Rustiadi and Endriatmo Soetarto},
    title = {Implikasi Keberadaan Hutan Negara terhadap Perkembangan Desa di Kecamatan Segah Kabupaten Berau Provinsi Kalimantan Timur},
    journal = {TATALOKA},
  volume = {23},
    number = {3},
    year = {2021},
    keywords = {},
    abstract = { The state forest existence is expected to provide maximum benefits for the people's prosperity. This study identified the forest state existence through a land tenure structure in Segah District Berau Regency East Kalimantan Province. It also described a portrait of rural development including the condition of infrastructure and community income/expenditure, and identified the influence of state forest existence on rural development. The methods used to analyze the structure of land tenure by overlaying land cover maps and boundaries of area functions in each village, then classifying villages using a matrix of plots based on the percentage of forest and forest area. Analysis of rural development was carried out using scalogram analysis and oneway ANOVA. Meanwhile, the analysis of the influence of state forest existence on rural development was carried out using descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression. The results of this study showed that the land cover of the forest and land tenure of forest area were dominant. This means that the land tenure structure in the administrative area of Segah District was dominated by state forest. Rural development in terms of infrastructure was found in a condition that was quite even lacking of the needs of the rural population, while average household expenditure is above the national average minimum expenditure limit. The state forest existence was indicated to have a role in influencing the development of rural infrastructure and household expenditure, especially in the activity of entering the forest which can reduce the expenditure of primary household needs. },
   issn = {2356-0266},   pages = {320--328}  doi = {10.14710/tataloka.23.3.320-328},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/article/view/5391}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

The state forest existence is expected to provide maximum benefits for the people's prosperity. This study identified the forest state existence through a land tenure structure in Segah District Berau Regency East Kalimantan Province. It also described a portrait of rural development including the condition of infrastructure and community income/expenditure, and identified the influence of state forest existence on rural development. The methods used to analyze the structure of land tenure by overlaying land cover maps and boundaries of area functions in each village, then classifying villages using a matrix of plots based on the percentage of forest and forest area. Analysis of rural development was carried out using scalogram analysis and oneway ANOVA. Meanwhile, the analysis of the influence of state forest existence on rural development was carried out using descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression. The results of this study showed that the land cover of the forest and land tenure of forest area were dominant. This means that the land tenure structure in the administrative area of Segah District was dominated by state forest. Rural development in terms of infrastructure was found in a condition that was quite even lacking of the needs of the rural population, while average household expenditure is above the national average minimum expenditure limit. The state forest existence was indicated to have a role in influencing the development of rural infrastructure and household expenditure, especially in the activity of entering the forest which can reduce the expenditure of primary household needs.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 23, No 3 (2021): Volume 23 No. 3, August 2021

Recent articles

Pemetaan Komoditas Basis di Kecamatan Polongbangkeng Utara Kabupaten Takalar Dampak Spasial Komunitas Berpagar terhadap Kawasan Perkotaan Mamminasata Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Dan Prediksinya dengan Menggunakan Markov – Cellular Automata Di Wilayah Peri Urban Kota Malang Tingkat Walkability dan Kepuasan Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Pendidikan Jatinangor dan Kawasan Perdagangan Sudirman Peran Website Desa dalam Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat Desa Nglanggeran dan Desa Girijati Kabupaten Gunungkidul Analisis Kebutuhan Pembangunan Tempat Pemakaman Umum di Perkotaan Tuban More recent articles

Agung P. 2012. Pengelolaan hutan oleh masyarakat sebagai sarana untuk mendapatkan kepastian tenurial: kasus di areal hutan produksi terbatas, KPHP Unit XVI Kab. Tanjung Jabung Barat, Propinsi Jambi [Tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor
Agustiono A. 2014. Kajian perubahan penggunaan lahan untuk arahan penataan pola ruang kawasan hutan produksi gedong wani Provinsi Lampung [Tesis]. Bogor (ID): IPB
Angi EM, Wiati CB. 2017. Kajian ekonomi politik deforestasi dan degradasi hutan dan lahan di Kabupaten Paser, Kalimantan Timur. JPED 3(2):63-80
Busck A, Hidding M, Kristenses S, Persson C, Praestholm S. 2008. Managing urban landscapes in the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden: comparing planning systems instruments in three different contexts. Dan J Geogr 108(2):1-16
Djajapertjunda S, Djamhuri E. 2013. Hutan dan Kehutanan Indonesia dari Masa ke Masa. Bogor (ID): IPB Pr
Gallent N, Andersson J, Bianconi M. 2006. Planning on the edge: England’s rural-urban fringe and the spatial-planning agenda. Environ Plan b 33:457-476
Gunawan R, Thamrin J, Suhendar E. 1998. Industrialisasi Kehutanan dan Dampaknya terhadap Masyarakat Adat: Kasus Kalimantan Timur. Bandung (ID): Yayasan AKATIGA
Jongeneel RA, Polman NBP, Slangen LHG. 2008. Why are dutch farmers going multifunctional? Land Use Policy 25:81-94
Karselaers E, Rogge E, Vanempten E, Lauwers L, Huylenbroeck GV. 2012. Changing land use in the countryside: stakeholders’ perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in flanders. Land Use Policy 32:197-206
[KLHK] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2017. Statistik Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Tahun 2017. Jakarta (ID): KLHK
Koentjaraningrat. 1972. Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial. Jakarta (ID): Dian Rakyat
Maruani T, Amit-Cohen I. 2007. Open space planning models: a review of approaches and methods. Landscape Urban Plan 81:1-13
Panuju DR, Rustiadi E. 2013. Teknik Analisis Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah. Bogor (ID): IPB
Peluso NL. 1991. The History of state forest management in colonial java. Forest and Conservation History 35(2):65-75
Peluso NL. 1993. Coercing conservation? the politics of state resource control. Glob Environ Change 3(2):199-217
Peluso NL. 2006. Hutan Kaya, Rakyat Melarat: Penguasaan Sumber Daya dan Perlawanan di Jawa
Simatupang L, penerjemah; Fauzi N, editor. Jakarta (ID): Konphalindo. Terjemahan dari Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java
Peluso NL, Vandergeest P. 2001. Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Journal Asian Stud 60:761-812
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2007. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2007 tentang Tata Hutan dan Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan serta Pemanfaatan Hutan. Jakarta (ID): Sekretariat Negara
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2008. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 6 Tahun 2007 tentang Tata Hutan dan Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan serta Pemanfaatan Hutan. Jakarta (ID): Sekretariat Negara
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 1999. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan. Jakarta (ID): Sekretariat Negara
Popkin SL. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley (US): California University Pr
Rustiadi E, Saefulhakim S, Panuju DR. 2011. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Jakarta (ID): Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
Safitri MA. 2013. Keniscayaan Transdisiplinaritas dalam Studi Sosio-Legal terhadap Hutan, Hukum, dan Masyarakat. Di dalam: Kartodihardjo H, editor. Kembali ke Jalan Lurus: Kritik Penggunaan Ilmu dan Praktek Kehutanan Indonesia. Bogor (ID): Forci Development dan Tanah Air Beta
Schlager E, Ostrom E. 1992. Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68(3): 249
Soetarto E, Sitorus MTF, Napiri MY. 2001. Decentralization of Administration, Policy Making and Forest Management in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan. Jakarta (ID): CIFOR
Suharjito D. 2001. Proses penyelesaian sengketa lahan hutan suatu kajian antropologi hukum: kasus sengketa lahan antara perusahaan HPH PT. Diamond Raya Timber dengan masyarakat lokal di Kabupaten Bengkalis Propinsi Riau. JMHT 7(1):1-14
Syahyuti. 2002. Pembentukan struktur agraria pada masyarakat pinggiran hutan: studi kasus di desa Sintuwu dan Desa Berdikari, Kecamatan Palolo, Kabupaten Donggala, Sulawesi Tengah [Tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor
Van Den Brink A, Van Der Valk A, Van Dijk T. 2006. Planning and the challenges of the metropolitan landscape: innovation in the Netherlands. Int Plann Stud 11:3-4
Vandergeest P, Peluso NL. 2006. Empires of forestry: professional forestry and state power in southeast asia part 1. Environment and History 12:31-64
Vandergeest P, Peluso NL. 2006. Empires of forestry: professional forestry and state power in southeast asia part 2. Environment and History 12:359-393
Verbist B, Pasya G. 2004. Perspektif sejarah status kawasan hutan, konflik dan negosiasi di Sumberjaya, Lampung Barat Propinsi Lampung. Agrivita 26(1):20-28
Wiradi G. 1978. Rural Development and Rural Institution: A Study of Institutional Changes in West Java. Agro-Economic Survey-Rural Dynamics 6
Wiradi G. 2009. Seluk Beluk Masalah Agraria, Reforma Agraria dan Penelitian Agraria. Yogyakarta (ID): STPN Pr dan Sains
Zasada I. 2011. Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28:639-648

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at Tataloka has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution; (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes.

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, non-exclusive right for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Publisher of Universitas Diponegoro Publishing Group.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from Tataloka . However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

Tataloka and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in Tataloka. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.