DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.23.3.%25p

Tingkat Walkability dan Kepuasan Pejalan Kaki di Kawasan Pendidikan Jatinangor dan Kawasan Perdagangan Sudirman

*Vitalani Rahmatiani  -  Jurursan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, ITENAS, Indonesia
Byna Kameswara  -  Jurursan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, ITENAS, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Walkability is a condition in an area that is friendly to pedestrians. To find out the comparison of the conditions of the pedestrian path, 2 (two) areas with different land uses but having the same characteristics are high pedestrians and problems related to walkability that have not been resolved. This study aims to identify the differences between the two research areas and the level of satisfaction of pedestrian users using the Global Walkability Index. The Jatinangor Education Area has a value of 45.5 which means not walkable, while the Sudirman Commercial Area has a value of 60.0 which means waiting to walk. Pedestrians show their dissatisfaction walking in the Jatinangor Education Area and pedestrians show their satisfaction in the Sudirman Commercial Area. This indicates that the Sudirman Commercial Area is more walkable than the Jatinangor Education Area. The results of the research are expected to serve as a direction for the development of the built environment's capacity to achieve a walkable area

Fulltext
Keywords: Global Walkability Index; level of satisfaction; educational areas; commercial areas

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Seminar Nasional ASPI 2020
Language : ID
Statistics:
Most cited articles
DAMPAK PROGRAM BANTUAN SOSIAL TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DAN KEMISKINAN KABUPATEN TERTINGGAL DI INDONESIA Back matter Back matter Back-matter Back-matter More cited articles
  1. Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65–84
  2. Firnanda, A. N., & Suharyadi, R. (2015). Kajian Penilaian Kondisi Jalur Pedestrian dengan Menggunakan Indeks Walkability (Kenyamanan Pejalan Kaki) di Kawasan Pendidikan YOGYAKARTA. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 4(1), 222882
  3. Forsyth, A. (2015). What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Design International, 20(4), 274–292
  4. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Vol. 7). New York: McGraw-Hill
  5. Gota, S., Fabian, H. G., Mejia, A. A., & Punte, S. S. (2010). Walkability surveys in Asian cities. Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities (CAI- Asia)., 20
  6. http://www.ictct.org/migrated_2014/ictct_document_nr_663_102A Sophie Sabine Punte Walkability Surveys in Asian Cities.pdf
  7. Hall, C. M., Ram, Y., & Shoval, N. (2017). The Routledge international handbook of walking. Routledge
  8. Juriah, Z., & Ujang, N. (2014). Comfort of Walking in the City Center of Kuala Lumpur
  9. Kementerian PUPR. (2017). Panduan Praktis Implementasi Agenda Baru Perkotaan - New Urban agenda. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  10. Krambeck, H. V. (2006). The global walkability index. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  11. Leather James, Fabian Herbert, Gota Sudhir, M. A. (2011). Walkability and Pedestrian Facilities in Asian Cities. Asian Development Bank
  12. Luna, C., & Ernawati, J. (2017). Kualitas Walkability pada Koridor Jalan Kayu Aya Seminyak Bali (Issue 0341)
  13. Lwin, K. K., & Murayama, Y. (2011). Modelling of urban green space walkability: Eco-friendly walk score calculator. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(5), 408–420
  14. Mashuri, M., & Ikbal, M. (2011). Studi Karakteristik Pejalan Kaki dan Pemilihan Jenis Fasilitas Penyeberangan Pejalan Kaki di Kota Palu (Studi Kasus: Jl. Emmi Saelan Depan Mal Tatura Kota Palu). Jurnal Rekayasa Dan Manajemen Transportasi, 1(2)
  15. Mayona, E. L., Moravian, A., & Azhari, R. (2013). Identifikasi Kebutuhan Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki di Kota Pontianak. Reka Loka, xx(x), 1–9
  16. Moura, F., Cambra, P., & Gonçalves, A. B. (2017). Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 282–296
  17. Nguyen, L. H. (2012). Walkability at Wright State University. Master of Public Health Program Student Publication
  18. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat. 2010. Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Provinsi Jawa Barat 2009-2029. Provinsi Jawa Barat
  19. Pemerintah Kota Bandung. 2015. Peraturan Daerah Kota Bandung No. 10 Tahun 2015 Tentang Rencana Detail Tata Ruang Dan Peraturan Zonasi Kota Bandung Tahun 2015 – 2035. Bandung
  20. Safitri, R., & Amelia, R. (2019). Walkability Index in Commercial Area of Pangkalpinang City. In Jurnal Infrastruktur (Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 79–83). https://doi.org/10.35814/infrastruktur.v5i2.1009
  21. Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(4), 246–257
  22. Sugiyono, S. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA Bandung
  23. Talen, E., & Koschinsky, J. (2013). The walkable neighborhood: A literature review. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning, 1(1)
  24. Tanan, N., Wibowo, S. S., & Tinumbia, N. (2017). Pengukuran Walkability Index Pada Ruas Jalan Di Kawasan Perkotaan. In Jalan-Jembatan (Vol. 34, Issue 2, pp. 115–127)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.