skip to main content

Implikasi Keberadaan Hutan Negara terhadap Perkembangan Desa di Kecamatan Segah Kabupaten Berau Provinsi Kalimantan Timur

*Sitti Hadijah  -  Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
Ernan Rustiadi  -  Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
Endriatmo Soetarto  -  Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The state forest existence is expected to provide maximum benefits for the people's prosperity. This study identified the forest state existence through a land tenure structure in Segah District Berau Regency East Kalimantan Province. It also described a portrait of rural development including the condition of infrastructure and community income/expenditure, and identified the influence of state forest existence on rural development. The methods used to analyze the structure of land tenure by overlaying land cover maps and boundaries of area functions in each village, then classifying villages using a matrix of plots based on the percentage of forest and forest area. Analysis of rural development was carried out using scalogram analysis and oneway ANOVA. Meanwhile, the analysis of the influence of state forest existence on rural development was carried out using descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression. The results of this study showed that the land cover of the forest and land tenure of forest area were dominant. This means that the land tenure structure in the administrative area of Segah District was dominated by state forest. Rural development in terms of infrastructure was found in a condition that was quite even lacking of the needs of the rural population, while average household expenditure is above the national average minimum expenditure limit. The state forest existence was indicated to have a role in influencing the development of rural infrastructure and household expenditure, especially in the activity of entering the forest which can reduce the expenditure of primary household needs.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

  1. Agung P. 2012. Pengelolaan hutan oleh masyarakat sebagai sarana untuk mendapatkan kepastian tenurial: kasus di areal hutan produksi terbatas, KPHP Unit XVI Kab. Tanjung Jabung Barat, Propinsi Jambi [Tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor
  2. Agustiono A. 2014. Kajian perubahan penggunaan lahan untuk arahan penataan pola ruang kawasan hutan produksi gedong wani Provinsi Lampung [Tesis]. Bogor (ID): IPB
  3. Angi EM, Wiati CB. 2017. Kajian ekonomi politik deforestasi dan degradasi hutan dan lahan di Kabupaten Paser, Kalimantan Timur. JPED 3(2):63-80
  4. Busck A, Hidding M, Kristenses S, Persson C, Praestholm S. 2008. Managing urban landscapes in the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden: comparing planning systems instruments in three different contexts. Dan J Geogr 108(2):1-16
  5. Djajapertjunda S, Djamhuri E. 2013. Hutan dan Kehutanan Indonesia dari Masa ke Masa. Bogor (ID): IPB Pr
  6. Gallent N, Andersson J, Bianconi M. 2006. Planning on the edge: England’s rural-urban fringe and the spatial-planning agenda. Environ Plan b 33:457-476
  7. Gunawan R, Thamrin J, Suhendar E. 1998. Industrialisasi Kehutanan dan Dampaknya terhadap Masyarakat Adat: Kasus Kalimantan Timur. Bandung (ID): Yayasan AKATIGA
  8. Jongeneel RA, Polman NBP, Slangen LHG. 2008. Why are dutch farmers going multifunctional? Land Use Policy 25:81-94
  9. Karselaers E, Rogge E, Vanempten E, Lauwers L, Huylenbroeck GV. 2012. Changing land use in the countryside: stakeholders’ perception of the ongoing rural planning processes in flanders. Land Use Policy 32:197-206
  10. [KLHK] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2017. Statistik Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Tahun 2017. Jakarta (ID): KLHK
  11. Koentjaraningrat. 1972. Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial. Jakarta (ID): Dian Rakyat
  12. Maruani T, Amit-Cohen I. 2007. Open space planning models: a review of approaches and methods. Landscape Urban Plan 81:1-13
  13. Panuju DR, Rustiadi E. 2013. Teknik Analisis Perencanaan Pengembangan Wilayah. Bogor (ID): IPB
  14. Peluso NL. 1991. The History of state forest management in colonial java. Forest and Conservation History 35(2):65-75
  15. Peluso NL. 1993. Coercing conservation? the politics of state resource control. Glob Environ Change 3(2):199-217
  16. Peluso NL. 2006. Hutan Kaya, Rakyat Melarat: Penguasaan Sumber Daya dan Perlawanan di Jawa
  17. Simatupang L, penerjemah; Fauzi N, editor. Jakarta (ID): Konphalindo. Terjemahan dari Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java
  18. Peluso NL, Vandergeest P. 2001. Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Journal Asian Stud 60:761-812
  19. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2007. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2007 tentang Tata Hutan dan Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan serta Pemanfaatan Hutan. Jakarta (ID): Sekretariat Negara
  20. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 2008. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 6 Tahun 2007 tentang Tata Hutan dan Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan serta Pemanfaatan Hutan. Jakarta (ID): Sekretariat Negara
  21. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. 1999. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan. Jakarta (ID): Sekretariat Negara
  22. Popkin SL. 1979. The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley (US): California University Pr
  23. Rustiadi E, Saefulhakim S, Panuju DR. 2011. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Jakarta (ID): Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia
  24. Safitri MA. 2013. Keniscayaan Transdisiplinaritas dalam Studi Sosio-Legal terhadap Hutan, Hukum, dan Masyarakat. Di dalam: Kartodihardjo H, editor. Kembali ke Jalan Lurus: Kritik Penggunaan Ilmu dan Praktek Kehutanan Indonesia. Bogor (ID): Forci Development dan Tanah Air Beta
  25. Schlager E, Ostrom E. 1992. Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68(3): 249
  26. Soetarto E, Sitorus MTF, Napiri MY. 2001. Decentralization of Administration, Policy Making and Forest Management in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan. Jakarta (ID): CIFOR
  27. Suharjito D. 2001. Proses penyelesaian sengketa lahan hutan suatu kajian antropologi hukum: kasus sengketa lahan antara perusahaan HPH PT. Diamond Raya Timber dengan masyarakat lokal di Kabupaten Bengkalis Propinsi Riau. JMHT 7(1):1-14
  28. Syahyuti. 2002. Pembentukan struktur agraria pada masyarakat pinggiran hutan: studi kasus di desa Sintuwu dan Desa Berdikari, Kecamatan Palolo, Kabupaten Donggala, Sulawesi Tengah [Tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor
  29. Van Den Brink A, Van Der Valk A, Van Dijk T. 2006. Planning and the challenges of the metropolitan landscape: innovation in the Netherlands. Int Plann Stud 11:3-4
  30. Vandergeest P, Peluso NL. 2006. Empires of forestry: professional forestry and state power in southeast asia part 1. Environment and History 12:31-64
  31. Vandergeest P, Peluso NL. 2006. Empires of forestry: professional forestry and state power in southeast asia part 2. Environment and History 12:359-393
  32. Verbist B, Pasya G. 2004. Perspektif sejarah status kawasan hutan, konflik dan negosiasi di Sumberjaya, Lampung Barat Propinsi Lampung. Agrivita 26(1):20-28
  33. Wiradi G. 1978. Rural Development and Rural Institution: A Study of Institutional Changes in West Java. Agro-Economic Survey-Rural Dynamics 6
  34. Wiradi G. 2009. Seluk Beluk Masalah Agraria, Reforma Agraria dan Penelitian Agraria. Yogyakarta (ID): STPN Pr dan Sains
  35. Zasada I. 2011. Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture: a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28:639-648

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.