DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.21.1.153-169

ASPEK-ASPEK PEMBENTUK KUALITAS TEMPAT BERDASARKAN SURVEI KAPABILITAS: DETERMINAN BAGI KEBAHAGIAAN MASYARAKAT

*RWD Pramono  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Ismah Aditia Nurfajrina  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Nastity Nariswari  -  Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Kebahagiaan dapat menjadi indikator penghubung pembangunan berkelanjutan dengan orientasi peningkatan kualitas hidup masyarakat. Salah satu penentu kebahagiaan adalah kualitas tempat. Dalam penelitian ini, kualitas tempat didefiniskan berdasarkan analisis terhadap rekaman persepsi dan pengalaman hidup masyarakat. Penelitian dilakukan berdasar pendekatan kapabilitas (PK) yang dijabarkan menjadi kerangka survei berupa kuisioner, beberapa pertanyan tambahan terkait dengan evaluasi diri terhadap tingkat kebahagiaan, serta pertanyaan yang menuntun responden untuk mengobservasi lingkungan tempat tinggal atau kotanya. Data persepsi responden dianalisis korelasinya yang dilanjutkan dengan analisis faktor untuk mengidentifikasi aspek-aspek pembentuk kualitas tempat. Pembahasan terhadap hasil temuan menjelaskan bagaimana suatu tempat dapat berkontribusi terhadap peningkatan kebahagiaan serta apa saja elemen fisik yang paling menentukan.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: aset; kapabilitas; kebahagiaan; kualitas tempat
Funding: Departemen Teknik Arsitektur dan Perencanaan Universitas Gadjah Mada

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
ANALISIS PENGARUH INFRASTRUKTUR TERHADAP KETIMPANGAN PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI WILAYAH DI PROVINSI ACEH PENGEMBANGAN KAWASAN INDUSTRI TELEMATIKA DALAM UPAYA MENDORONG DAYA SAING REGIONAL (KASUS KOTA CIMAHI) KUALITAS LINGKUNGAN PERMUKIMAN KAWASAN INDUSTRI DI KECAMATAN GENUK KOTA SEMARANG ADAPTIVE SPACE OF JAVANESE TRADITIONAL HOUSE IN BRAYUT TOURISM VILLAGE YOGYAKARTA THE TOOLS OF QUALITATIVE APPROACH TO MEASURE RURAL TRANSFORMATION: THE CASE OF YOGYAKARTA RURAL VILLAGE Back matter Front matter More recent articles
  1. BPS DIY. (2017). Indeks Kebahagiaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Tahun 2017 Sebesar 72,93. Retrieved from https://yogyakarta.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2017/09/04/812/indeks-kebahagiaan-daerah-istimewa-yogyakarta-tahun-2017-sebesar-72-93.html
  2. Cloutier S., & Pfeiffer D. (2017). Happiness: An Alternative Objective for Sustainable Community Development. In International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life (pp 85-96) (Phillips R., Wong C. (eds) Handbook of Community Well-Being Research). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0878-2_5
  3. DPPKA DIY. (n.d.). Peta Wilayah Administrasi DIY [Government]. Retrieved from http://dppka.jogjaprov.go.id/upload/files/peta_wil_adm_diy.jpg
  4. Fleury-Bahi, G., Pol, E., & Navarro, O. (2017). Introduction: Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research (pp. 1–8). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_1
  5. Hair, J. F. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall
  6. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Eds). Prentice Hall
  7. Heřmanová, E. (2012). Kvalita života a její modely v současném sociálním výzkumu (Quality of Life and its Models in Contemporary Social Research. Praha: Sociológia
  8. Ira V. (2003). Changing intra-urban structure of Bratislava city and its perception. Geografický Časopis, (55), 91–107
  9. Johnson, Richard A., & Wichern, Dean W. (2013). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited
  10. Marans R.W., & Stimson R. (2011). An Overview of Quality of Urban Life. In Marans R., Stimson R. (eds) Investigating Quality of Urban Life. Social Indicators Research Series (Vol. 45, pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1742-8_1
  11. Pramono, R. (2018). The transect of happiness and community’s capability in urbanizing Yogyakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 126, 012099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012099
  12. Pramono, R. W. D. (2016). Capability Approach for well-being Evaluation in Regional Development Planning: Case Study in Magelang Regency. Central Java, Indonesia [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Gadjah Mada. University of Groningen. Retrieved from https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/publications/capability-approach-for-wellbeing-evaluation-in-regional-development-planning(5154dbc9-00d1-41a2-b2d4-a16e6cc62f8d).html
  13. Pramono, R. W. D., & Woltjer, J. (2011). Wellbeing and a Capability Approach in Planning Evaluation and Regional Development. In A. Hull, E. Alexander, A. Khakee, & J. Woltjer (Eds.), Evaluation for Sustainability and Participation in Planning. London: Routledge
  14. Ramadier, T. (2017). Adjustment to Geographical Space and Psychological Well-Being. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research (pp. 291–307). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_16
  15. Ramadier, T., & Enaux, C. (2016). Socio-Cognitive Accessibility to Places. In P. Frankhauser & D. Ansel (Eds.), Deciding Where to Live (pp. 71–91). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15542-1_3
  16. Rogerson, R. J., Findlay, A. M., Morris, A. S., & Coombes, M. G. (1989). Indicators of Quality of Life: Some Methodological Issues. Environment and Planning A, 21(12), 1655–1666. https://doi.org/10.1068/a211655
  17. Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied Factor Analysis. United States of America: Northwestern University Press
  18. Santosa, S. (2002). SPSS Statistik Multivariat. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo
  19. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2017). The experienced psychological benefits of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.001
  20. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books
  21. Sen, A. (2000). Social Exlusion: Concept, Application, and Scrutiny. Manila, Philippines: Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank
  22. UN-United Nations. (2012). “A new economic paradigm is needed to capture social, economic and environmental aspects of sustainable development.” Statement of the Secretary-General at the High-Level Meeting on Well-being and Happiness, 2 April 2012, UN headquarters in New York
  23. van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3
  24. Widarjono, A. (2010). Analisis Statistika Multivariat Terapan. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.