KAJIAN KESIAPAN UMKM BATIK SURAKARTA TERHADAP DIMENSI EKONOMI CERDAS SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI PENERAPAN KONSEP SMART CITY

*Godlive Handel Immanuel Sitorus -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Wido Prananing Tyas -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Received: 28 Mar 2018; Published: 15 Mar 2019.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: ID
Full Text:
In Vol 21, No 1 (2019): Volume 21 No. 1, February 2019
Statistics: 94 9
Abstract

The city of Surakarta (Solo) is currently in the process stage to realize the concept of Solo Smart City. SMEs Surakarta Batik sector became one of the focus of government to be encouraged to be able to apply the principles of smart economy in its activities. This study aims to see how the level of readiness of SMEs Surakarta Batik in order to see how strong the role of SMEs Surakarta Batik in encouraging the implementation of smart economic dimensions. Assessment of readiness is done by analyzing the condition of five smart economic indicators, namely: innovative spirit, collaboration and participation, entrepreneurship, productivity, and competitiveness. The readiness levels designed in this study are divided into three categories: ready, ready on condition, and not yet ready. The research method used in this research is a quantitative method with the use of mixed qualitative and quantitative data. The analytical technique used is scoring. The result of this research concludes that the level of readiness of SMEs Surakarta Batik is at the level of ready on condition, meaning that SMEs Surakarta Batik basically can be said ready to realize the smart economic dimension, but there are some aspects that need attention to be developed in order to really pushing the realization (1) aspects of decision making on innovative spirit indicators, (2) aspects of collaboration on innovative spirit indicators, and (3) business administration management systems on productivity indicators.

Keywords
smart city; smart economy; Batik Surakarta SMEs

Article Metrics:

  1. Bank Indonesia; Lembaga Pengembangan Perbankan Indonesia. (2015). Profil Bisnis Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.
  2. BPS Kota Surakarta. 2016. Kota Surakarta dalam Angka Tahun 2016.
  3. Borsekova, K., Vanova, A., & Vitalisova, K. (2016). The Power of Communities in Smart Urban Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.289
  4. Cho, D.-S., Moon, H.-C., & Kim, M.-Y. (2008). Characterizing international competitiveness in international business research: A MASI approach to national competitiveness. Research in International Business and Finance, 175-192.
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publication.
  6. Dinas Perdagangan. (2017). Data Realisasi Ekspor Kota Surakarta tahun 2012-2016. Kota Surakarta: Dinas Perdagangan Kota Surakarta.
  7. Etzkowitz, H., & deMello. (2004). The Rise of a Triple Helix Culture: Innovation in Brazilian economic and social development. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 159-171.
  8. Evers, H.-D. (2008). Knowledge hubs and knowledge clusters: Designing a knowledge architecture for development. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 1-21.
  9. FPKBL. (2017, Oktober 1). Festival Laweyan. Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia.
  10. Giffinger, P. M. (2007). European smart cities – New scientific ranking instrument for European middle-sized cities. Munich Expo Real. Munich: Technical University of Vienna.
  11. Govada, S., Spruijt, W., & Rodgers, T. (2017). China-Hong Kong Hksar. In T. V. Kumar, Smart Economy in Smart Cities (pp. 171-245). New Delhi: Springer.
  12. Hansen, M. T., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The Innovation Value Chain. Harvard Business Review, (2007), 1–7.
  13. Huda, M., & Santoso, E. B. (2014). Pengembangan Daya Saing Daerah. JURNAL TEKNIK POMITS, 2301-9271.
  14. ISO/ IEC JTC 1. (2015). Smart Cities. Switzerland: ISO.
  15. Joshi, S., Saxena, S., Godbole, T., & Shreya. (2016). Developing Smart Cities: An Integrated Framework. Procedia Computer Science, 93(September), 902–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.258
  16. Kumar, T. M. V., & Dahiya, B. (2017). Smart Economy in Smart Cities. Smart Economy in Smart Cities. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1610-3
  17. Martini, L., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., Anggoro, Y., Pritasari, A., & Hutapea, L. (2012). Triple Helix Collaboration to Develop Economic Corridors as Knowledge Hub in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.449
  18. Menkhoff, T., Evers, H. D., Wah, C. Y., & Fong, P. E. (2011). Beyond The Knowledge Trap: Developing Asia's Knowledge-Based Economies. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co, Pte.Ltd.
  19. Pontoh, Nia K & Kustiawan, Iwan. (2009). Pengantar Perencanaan Perkotaan. Bandung: Penerbit ITB.
  20. Pusponegoro, M., Saim, M., & Muttaqin, H. (2007). Kauman Religi, Tradisi, dan Seni. Surakarta: Paguyuban Kampung Batik Kauman.
  21. Richter, C., Kraus, S., & Syrjä, P. (2015). The Smart City as an opportunity for entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 7(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2015.071481
  22. Rogers, E. M. (1993). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: THE FREE PRESS-A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.
  23. Sharma, S. (2017, Desember 11-15). ICT Trends, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
  24. Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kunatitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  25. Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung : Alfabeta
  26. Sulistyorini, U. T. (2017). Peningkatan Kinerja Produk Melalui Pemberdayaan Inovasi: Studi Kasus pada UKM Batik Tulis Ekspor Surakarta. Politeknik Negeri Semarang, 167-187.
  27. Supangkat, S. H. (2015). Pengenalan dan pengembangan Smart City. Bandung: e-Indonesia Initiatives.
  28. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft (Vol. 55). Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00192_2.x
  29. Weismeier-Sammer, D. (2011). Entrepreneurial behavior in family firms: A replication study. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 128-138.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to TATALOKA, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal.

In consideration for publication of your work, if published on behalf of the TATALOKA, the author agrees to transfer the work to the TATALOKA, including full and exclusive rights to publication in all media now known or later developed, including but not limited to electronic databases.