PREFERENSI LOKASI INDUSTRI BERBASIS POTENSI LOKAL DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS

*Muhammad Abdullah Tsani  -  Dinas Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman Kabupaten Banyumas, Indonesia
Prihadi Nugroho scopus  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Received: 4 Oct 2017; Published: 15 Mar 2019.
Open Access
Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: INA
Full Text:
In Vol 21, No 1 (2019): Volume 21 No. 1, February 2019
Statistics: 234 115

Abstract

Locations for industrial development in Indonesia often determined by spatial allocation policies than the needs of industrial players. This creates a gap between the industrial spatial allocation stated in regulation and location needs of industrial actors. That indicated by the rejection of offerings location by industrial actors. The industry is a business activity and its location chosen in the most favourable place and influenced by the location factors. However, industrial location decisions not only emphasizes to the preferences of the perpetrators but also influenced by strategies and policies within the larger organizational environment of central and local governments. A quantitative approach used in this study to assess the location preferences of local-based industries (IBPL) in Banyumas Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia. The objective is to evaluate the local spatial regulation of industrial allocation zones so that the gap can be reduced. The study findings revealed that IBPL site preferences related to the local content of industrial characteristics and industrial scales. Medium and large IBPLs indicated to clustered; their location preferences tend to close to the supplier industries and located in the main of roads. The spatial distribution of small-scales IBPL sites show the symptoms of spontaneous location. It influenced by factor of local potential accessibility of labor. There are ten location factors affecting IBPL site selection and lean to show the dependence element of traditional industry characteristics. The most influential location factors are accessibility to the local potencies and accessibility to the business networks.

Keywords
preferensi lokasi; faktor lokasi; industri berbasis potensi lokal (IBPL); karakteristik industri; persebaran lokasi industri

Article Metrics:

  1. An, Y., Kang, Y., & Lee, S. (2014). A study on the impact of soft location factors in the relocation of service and manufacturing firms. International Journal of Urban Sciences, (May 2014), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2014.893834
  2. Assink, M., & Groenendijk, N. (2009). Spatial Quality, Location Theory and Spatial Planning. In Regional Studies Association Annual Conference 2009 Understanding and Shaping Regions: Spatial, Social and Economic Futures (pp. 1–12). Retrieved from http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/71952
  3. Badri, M. A. (2007). Dimensions of Industrial Location Factors: Review and Exploration. Business and Public Affairs, 1(2), 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.scientificjournals.org/journals2007/articles/1178.pdf.
  4. Bargos, F. F. F., Lamas, W. de Q., Bargos, D. C. C., Neto, M. B. B., & Pardal, P. C. P. M. (2016). Location problem method applied to sugar and ethanol mills location optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 274–282. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.079
  5. Capello, R. (2014). Classical Contributions: Von Thunen, Weber, Christaller, Losch. In M. M. Fischer & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of Regional Science (pp. 507–526). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9
  6. Chan, Y. (2011). Location Theory and Decision Analysis (2nd editio). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15663-2
  7. Chapman, K., & F Walker, D. (1991). Industrial Location: Principles and Policies (2nd Editio). Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford, OX4 1JF, UK.
  8. Djojodipuro, M. (1992). Teori Lokasi. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia (FE-UI).
  9. Elliott, F. E. (1948). Locational Factors Affecting Industrial Plants. In Economic Geography (Vol. 24, pp. 283–285). Clark University. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/141309
  10. Fahmi, F. Z., Koster, S., & van Dijk, J. (2016). The Location of Creative Industries in A Developing Country: The Case of Indonesia. Cities, 59, 66–79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.06.005
  11. Fischer, M. M., & Nijkamp, F. (2014). Handbook of Regional Science. (M. M. Fischer & F. Nijkamp, Eds.) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9
  12. Fujita, M. (2010). The Evolution of Spatial Economics: From Thunen to The New Economic Geography. Japanese Economic Review, 61(1), 1–32. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2009.00504.x
  13. Gatfield, T., & Yang, C. (2006). New Industrial Space Theory – A Case Study and Empirical Analysis of Factors Effecting Newly Emerging Key Industries In Queensland. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 12(1), 47–61. Retrieved from http://anzrsai.org/assets/Uploads/PublicationChapter/81-4GatfieldYang.pdf
  14. Gorter, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). Location Theory. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 14, 287–292. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.72029-0
  15. Hall, P. (2000). Creative Cities and Economic Development. Urban Studies, 37(4), 639–649. http://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050003946
  16. Harrington, J. W., & Warf, B. (1995). Industrial Location: Principles, Practice, and Policy. New York, NY: Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14.
  17. Hatcher, L., & O’Rourke, N. (2013). A Step-by-Step Approach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Retrieved from http://www.google.com.tr/books?id=dqNku94w1dIC
  18. Jovanovic, M. N. (2003). Local vs. Global Location of Firms and Industries. Journal of Economic Integration, 18(1), 60–104. http://doi.org/10.2307/23000732
  19. Kimelberg, S. M., & Nicoll, L. A. (2012). Business Location Decisions in the Medical Device Industry: Evidence from Massachusetts. Economic Development Quarterly, 26(1), 34–49. http://doi.org/10.1177/0891242411430327
  20. McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2008). Location Matters: Where We Have Been and Where We Might Go in Agglomeration Research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 532–565. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316057
  21. Needham, B., Louw, E., & Metzemakers, P. (2013). An economic theory for industrial land policy. Land Use Policy, 33, 227–234. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.01.005
  22. Pen, C. (1999). Improving the behavioural location theory: Preliminary results of a writen questionnaire about strategic decision-making on firm relocation. European RSA Congress Regional Cohesion and Competitiveness in 21st Century Europe, Dublin. Retrieved from http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa99/Papers/a166.pdf
  23. Polèse, M., Rubiera-Morollon, F., & Shearmur, R. (2007). Observing regularities in location patterns: An analysis of the spatial distribution of economic activity in Spain. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2), 157–180. http://doi.org/10.1177/0969776407077188
  24. Rustiadi, E., S, S., & Panuju. (2009). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Wilayah. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
  25. Smith, D. M. (1966). A Theoretical Framework for Geographical Studies of Industrial Location. Economic Geography, 42(2), 95–113. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305208450_A_Theoretical_Framework_for_Geographical_Studies_of_Industrial_Location
  26. Songmei, L. (2005). High tech spatial concentration human capital, agglomeration economies, location theories and creative cities. The University of Louisville’s Institutional Repository. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18297/etd/824
  27. Sugiyono, P. D. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
  28. Szymanska, A., & Plaziak, M. (2014). Enterprise and classical factors of its location on the market. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120, 13–22. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.076
  29. ___________. (2016). Kabupaten Banyumas Dalam Angka 2016. BPS Kabupaten Banyumas.
  30. ___________, 2011. Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Banyumas Nomor 10 Tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) Kabupaten Banyumas Tahun 2011-2031.

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to TATALOKA, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal.

In consideration for publication of your work, if published on behalf of the TATALOKA, the author agrees to transfer the work to the TATALOKA, including full and exclusive rights to publication in all media now known or later developed, including but not limited to electronic databases.