Keterikatan Anak Sekolah Dasar di Desa Pagar Dalam, Provinsi Lampung terhadap Ruang Bermain

Diko Hary Adhanto; Widyawati Sumadio

doi:10.14710/tataloka.24.2.167-185

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.24.2.167-185

Keterikatan Anak Sekolah Dasar di Desa Pagar Dalam, Provinsi Lampung terhadap Ruang Bermain

*Diko Hary Adhanto

- University of Indonesia, Indonesia

Widyawati Sumadio - University of Indonesia, Indonesia

under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{tataloka10389,
    author = {Diko Adhanto and Widyawati Sumadio},
    title = {Keterikatan Anak Sekolah Dasar di Desa Pagar Dalam, Provinsi Lampung terhadap Ruang Bermain},
    journal = {TATALOKA},
  volume = {24},
    number = {2},
    year = {2022},
    keywords = {Keterikatan Tempat, Ruang Bermain, Anak Pedesaan, Pemetaan Mental},
    abstract = {Sense of place adalah upaya sesorang untuk memahami ‘status’ mereka dalam dunia dan membentuk rasa identitas diri. Dari sense of place ini seseorang memiliki identitas tempat. Identitas tempat sendiri berkembang karena penjelajahan seseorang di lingkungan terdekatnya. Penjelajahan lingkungan di awali sejak usia dini dengan berbagai cara. Salah satu cara menjelajahi lingkungan adalah dengan bermain. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pola ruang bermain anak berdasarkan karakteristik tempat, dan karakteristik demografi anak. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui pemetaan mental kepada 80 anak kelas 1 hingga 5 dan pengukuran indeks keterikatan tempat kepada 44 anak yang duduk di kelas 4 dan 5 Sekolah Dasar, di Desa Pagar Dalam, Provinsi Lampung. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah 75% anak-anak pedesaan memilih bermain di lingkungan dekat rumahnya. Tingkat identitas dan ketergantungan tempat pada semua ruang bermain bernilai baik. Sedangkan interpretasi peta mental, elemen alam pada kategori penilaian memiliki skor yang hampir dominan pada beberapa ruang bermain. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini adalah anak pedesaan cenderung memilih ruang bermain yang dekat dengan lokasi tempat tinggal mereka dan adanya perluasan jangkauan dalam mengeksplorasi ruang bermain yang lebih jauh berdasarkan umur dan gender. Keterikatan fungsional dan keterikatan emosional anak terhadap ruang bermain berbeda-beda dengan elemen alam yang sangat dominan.},
   issn = {2356-0266},   pages = {167--185}  doi = {10.14710/tataloka.24.2.167-185},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/tataloka/article/view/10389}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Sense of place adalah upaya sesorang untuk memahami ‘status’ mereka dalam dunia dan membentuk rasa identitas diri. Dari sense of place ini seseorang memiliki identitas tempat. Identitas tempat sendiri berkembang karena penjelajahan seseorang di lingkungan terdekatnya. Penjelajahan lingkungan di awali sejak usia dini dengan berbagai cara. Salah satu cara menjelajahi lingkungan adalah dengan bermain. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pola ruang bermain anak berdasarkan karakteristik tempat, dan karakteristik demografi anak. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui pemetaan mental kepada 80 anak kelas 1 hingga 5 dan pengukuran indeks keterikatan tempat kepada 44 anak yang duduk di kelas 4 dan 5 Sekolah Dasar, di Desa Pagar Dalam, Provinsi Lampung. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah 75% anak-anak pedesaan memilih bermain di lingkungan dekat rumahnya. Tingkat identitas dan ketergantungan tempat pada semua ruang bermain bernilai baik. Sedangkan interpretasi peta mental, elemen alam pada kategori penilaian memiliki skor yang hampir dominan pada beberapa ruang bermain. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini adalah anak pedesaan cenderung memilih ruang bermain yang dekat dengan lokasi tempat tinggal mereka dan adanya perluasan jangkauan dalam mengeksplorasi ruang bermain yang lebih jauh berdasarkan umur dan gender. Keterikatan fungsional dan keterikatan emosional anak terhadap ruang bermain berbeda-beda dengan elemen alam yang sangat dominan.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Keterikatan Tempat, Ruang Bermain, Anak Pedesaan, Pemetaan Mental

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 24, No 2 (2022): Volume 24 No. 2, May 2022

Recent articles

Determinan Keberlanjutan Petani Sawit Swadaya dalam Rantai Pasok Multi-Jenjang Formulation of Framework for Evacuation of Tsunami Disaster after COVID-19 Pandemic on The South Coast of Watulimo, Trenggalek Keterikatan Anak Sekolah Dasar di Desa Pagar Dalam, Provinsi Lampung terhadap Ruang Bermain [RETRACTED] Pengaruh Internet Terhadap Intensi Migrasi Internasional Kaum Muda di Perdesaan (Studi Kasus di Desa Tambakasri) More recent articles

Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (1992). Place attachment
Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 22(4), 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409950202285
Canter, D. (1997). The Facets of Place. In Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods, Research, and Utilization (pp. 109–147). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4425-5_4
Edelson. (2011). Geo-Literacy | National Geographic Society. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/article/geo-literacy-preparation-far-reaching-decisions/
Fried, M. A. (1966). Grieving for a lost home : psychological costs of relocation. Urban Renewal : The Record and the Controversy
Gandy, S. (2007). Developmentally Appropriate Geography. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 20(2), 30–32
Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A Space for Place in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 463–496. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463
Gillespie, C. A. (2010). How culture constructs our sense of neighborhood:Mentalmaps and children’s perceptions of place. Journal of Geography, 109(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340903459447
Gustafson, P. (2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0185
Hurlock, E. B. (1980). Psikologi perkembangan : suatu pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan. Jakarta: Erlangga
Jorgensen, & Stedman. (2001). Sense of place as an attachment: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 233–248. https://doi.org/10/1006/jevp2001.0226
Kaplan, J. (2018). The Experience of Nature. Apocalypse, Revolution and Terrorism, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351054386-1
Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005). Testing the Dimensionality of Place Attachment in Recreational Settings. Environment and Behavior, 37(2), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504269654
Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? In Journal of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 31, Issue 3, pp. 207–230). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
Lin, C. C., & Lockwood, M. (2014). Forms and sources of place attachment: Evidence from two protected areas. Geoforum, 53, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.008
Mathews, M. . (1984). Cognitive mapping abilities of young boys and girls. Journal of Geography, 69, 327–335
Matthews, M. H. (1984). Environmental cognition of young children: images of journey to school and home area. Transactions - Institute of British Geographers, 9(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/621869
Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409409513214
Piaget, J., Piercy, M., & Berlyne, D. E. (1950). The psychology of intelligence
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80021-8
Raymond, C. M., Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2010). The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.002
Riley, R. B. (1992). Attachment to the Ordinary Landscape. In Place Attachment (pp. 13–35). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_2
Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a Social Psychology of Place. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001
Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction?: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources, 16(8), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309189
Tuan, Y. (1974). Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Prentice-Hall
Tuan, Y. (2001). Space and place : the perspective of experience
Umi Narimawati. (2007). Riset Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Aplikasi Contoh Perhitungannya.pdf
Walker, G. J., & Chapman, R. (2003). Thinking Like a Park: The Effects of Sense of Place, Perspective-Taking, and Empathy on Pro-Environmental Intentions
Williams, D. R. (2014). Measuring Place Attachment : Some Preliminary Results. October 1989
Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409209513155
Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The Measurement of Place Attachment: Validity and Generalizability of a Psychometric Approach. Forest Science, 49(6), 830–840. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/49.6.830

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at Tataloka has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution, (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants ; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes.

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Tataloka . Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from Tataloka . However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

Tataloka and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in Tataloka. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.

The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form - Indonesian] [Copyright Transfer Form - English]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editor in the form of printed letters, scanned documents sent via email or fax.