BibTex Citation Data :
@article{Southsight28925, author = {Shivangi Asthana}, title = {Fake News and Its Influence on Political Polarization}, journal = {South Sight: Journal of Media and Society Inquiry}, volume = {1}, number = {2}, year = {2025}, keywords = {India; United States; 2024 elections; media watchdogs; fake news}, abstract = { Digital spaces have become critical arenas for the spread of fake news and hate speech, which exacerbate societal polarization. This polarization intensifies divides, often along partisan lines, and can escalate into violence, thereby undermining social cohesion and democratic stability. During elections, fake news campaigns contribute significantly to polarization by influencing voter behavior, spreading misinformation rapidly, and raising concerns about the credibility of information sources and free speech. As most democracies depend on informed voters and fair electoral processes, the role of independent media watchdogs becomes vital. This paper examines how media watchdogs operated during world’s biggest democratic elections, in India and the United States in 2024. The chapter focuses on two key questions: (1) What role do media watchdogs play in political polarization and disinformation during elections? And (2) How do they promote accurate information and democratic resilience in highly polarized electoral contexts? Through a comparative analysis of content published by Newslaundry in India and American Oversight in the U.S., this study identifies how these organizations addressed misinformation and exposed fake news tactics. The 2024 elections illustrate how polarization shaped electoral outcomes, public discourse, media narratives, and democratic participation in both countries. Despite challenges like rapid digital disinformation spread, social media amplification, and enforcement gaps, watchdogs employed collaborative and investigative methods to uphold media accountability. The findings reveal convergences and divergences in their approaches, emphasizing their critical role in enhancing transparency, combating disinformation, and strengthening democratic resilience amidst polarized electoral environments. }, issn = {3109-8460}, pages = {87--99} doi = {10.14710/southsight.202528925}, url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/southsight/article/view/28925} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Digital spaces have become critical arenas for the spread of fake news and hate speech, which exacerbate societal polarization. This polarization intensifies divides, often along partisan lines, and can escalate into violence, thereby undermining social cohesion and democratic stability. During elections, fake news campaigns contribute significantly to polarization by influencing voter behavior, spreading misinformation rapidly, and raising concerns about the credibility of information sources and free speech. As most democracies depend on informed voters and fair electoral processes, the role of independent media watchdogs becomes vital. This paper examines how media watchdogs operated during world’s biggest democratic elections, in India and the United States in 2024. The chapter focuses on two key questions: (1) What role do media watchdogs play in political polarization and disinformation during elections? And (2) How do they promote accurate information and democratic resilience in highly polarized electoral contexts? Through a comparative analysis of content published by Newslaundry in India and American Oversight in the U.S., this study identifies how these organizations addressed misinformation and exposed fake news tactics. The 2024 elections illustrate how polarization shaped electoral outcomes, public discourse, media narratives, and democratic participation in both countries. Despite challenges like rapid digital disinformation spread, social media amplification, and enforcement gaps, watchdogs employed collaborative and investigative methods to uphold media accountability. The findings reveal convergences and divergences in their approaches, emphasizing their critical role in enhancing transparency, combating disinformation, and strengthening democratic resilience amidst polarized electoral environments.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
In order to be accepted and published by South Sight: Journal of Media and Society Inquiry, the author (s) who submit a manuscript should complete the review process. South Sight: Journal of Media and Society Inquiry articles are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Articles can be read, shared, and adapted even for commercial purposes under the following conditions:
The copyright of received articles is assigned to the author (s). Author(s) have the right to articles that have been published. The Editorial Team of South Sight: Journal of Media and Society Inquiry and Author(s) strive to ensure that no errors occur in the articles that have been published, both data errors and statements in the article. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
