skip to main content

Sifat Mekanik Beton Geopolimer Akibat Pengaruh Substitusi Parsial Calcium Carbide Residue (CCR)

*Erma Desimaliana orcid scopus  -  Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung, Jl. PHH Mustofa no. 23, Bandung, Indonesia 40125, Indonesia
Muhammad Daffa Fahrezi  -  Department of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung, Jl. PHH Mustofa no. 23, Bandung, Indonesia 40125, Indonesia
Altie Santika Arifin  -  PT Dian Widya Enjiniring, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
The utilization of calcium carbide residue as a calcium-rich secondary binder offers a route to improve industrial-waste valorization in fly-ash geopolymer concrete. This study evaluates the fresh and mechanical performance of geopolymer concrete containing a 50:50 mass proportion of low-calcium fly ash and calcium carbide residue in the precursor fraction. The aggregate-to-binder ratio was 60:40, the precursor-to-alkaline-activator ratio was 70:30, and sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate were used at a 1:1 ratio. Cylindrical specimens (100 mm × 200 mm) were tested in compression at 7, 14, and 28 days, while splitting tensile strength was measured at 28 days. The mixture produced a slump-flow diameter of 555 mm, indicating high flowability despite its visually cohesive and sticky consistency. Average compressive strengths reached 13.81, 17.53, and 23.67 MPa at 7, 14, and 28 days, respectively, corresponding to a 71.4% increase from 7 to 28 days. The 28-day splitting tensile strength was 2.54 MPa, equivalent to 10.7% of the compressive strength. Compressive failure was dominated by longitudinal splitting with localized end spalling, whereas the splitting test produced a nearly straight diametral crack without massive aggregate loss. The findings demonstrate that a high-volume carbide-residue/fly-ash binder can develop structural-grade compressive strength under the adopted activation system.
Fulltext Email colleagues

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
  1. Amran, Y. H. M., Alyousef, R., Alabduljabbar, H., & El-Zeadani, M. (2020). Clean production and properties of geopolymer concrete; A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119679. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.119679
  2. Angelika, S. K., Desimaliana, E., & Khanza, M. (2023). Pengaruh Subtitusi Parsial Variasi Tepung Kaca Terhadap Kuat Tekan Beton Geopolimer. RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknil Sipil, 9(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.26760/rekaracana.v9i2.70
  3. Bawab, J., El-Hassan, H., El-Dieb, A., Khatib, J., & El-Mir, A. (2025). Utilization of calcium carbide residue as a concrete component: A comprehensive review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 22, e04823. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCM.2025.E04823
  4. Desimaliana, E., Dharu, M. A., & Shima, R. D. (2025). STUDI EKSPERIMENTAL KUAT TEKAN MORTAR GEOPOLIMER AKIBAT PENGARUH LIMBAH ABU TEMPURUNG KELAPA SEBAGAI BINDER. 2(2), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.31934/jst.v2i1.10289
  5. Desimaliana, E., Shima, R. D., & Musyaffa, F. (2024). Analisis Biaya terhadap Pengaruh Penggunaan Limbah Marmer dan Abu Sekam Padi pada Beton Geopolimer. Journal of Sustainable Construction, 3(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.26593/josc.v3i2.7905
  6. Desimaliana, E., Widyaningsih, E., & Kaltsum, A. Q. N. (2025). The effect of curing method on geopolymer concrete compressive strength. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3351(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0299754
  7. Desimaliana, E., Widyaningsih, E., Kaltsum, A. Q. N., & Setiana, T. I. (2025). Studi Eksperimental Kuat Tekan Beton Geopolimer dengan Metode Curing Pembasahan. Jurnal Proyek Teknik Sipil, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.14710/potensi.2025.25933
  8. Desimaliana, E., Widyaningsih, E., & Syafira, T. H. (2026). Pengaruh Penambahan Serat Polypropylene terhadap Kuat Tekan dan Kuat Tarik Belah Beton Geopolimer. Journal of Sustainable Construction, 5(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.26593/josc.v5i2.10264
  9. Diredja, N. V., Desimaliana, E., & Pranata, Y. A. (2026). Performance evaluation of steam and membrane curing on geopolymer mortar with fly ash and carbide waste. E3S Web of Conferences, 688, 03001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668803001
  10. Farooq, F., Jin, X., Faisal Javed, M., Akbar, A., Izhar Shah, M., Aslam, F., & Alyousef, R. (2021). Geopolymer concrete as sustainable material: A state of the art review. Construction and Building Materials, 306, 124762. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.124762
  11. Hanjitsuwan, S., Phoo-ngernkham, T., Li, L. yuan, Damrongwiriyanupap, N., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2018). Strength development and durability of alkali-activated fly ash mortar with calcium carbide residue as additive. Construction and Building Materials, 162, 714–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.12.034
  12. Hidayattulloh, T., & Desimaliana, E. (2025). PENGARUH OVEN CURING TERHADAP KUAT TEKAN MORTAR GEOPOLIMER DENGAN SUBSTITUSI LIMBAH KARBIT. JUMATISI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Sipil), 6(1), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.24127/jumatisi.v6i1.9315
  13. Julphunthong, P., Joyklad, P., Manprom, P., Chompoorat, T., Palou, M. T., & Suriwong, T. (2024). Evaluation of calcium carbide residue and fly ash as sustainable binders for environmentally friendly loess soil stabilization. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51326-x
  14. Kaltsum, A. Q. N., & Desimaliana, E. (2025). Studi Eksperimental Kuat Tekan Mortar Geopolimer Substitusi Limbah Kaca sebagai Filler dengan Metode Perawatan Membran. Jurnal Teknik Sipil MACCA, 10(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.33096/w5ht8a61
  15. Mohammed, A. A., Ahmed, H. U., & Mosavi, A. (2021). Survey of mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review and data analysis. Materials, 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164690
  16. Mualim, M. F., Desimaliana, E., & Shima, R. D. (2025). Pengaruh Penggunaan Abu Ampas Tebu Sebagai Substitusi Fly Ash Terhadap Kuat Tekan Mortar Geopolimer. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Institut …, 12(2), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.21063/jts.2025.V1202.0186-193
  17. Nath, P., & Sarker, P. K. (2017). Flexural strength and elastic modulus of ambient-cured blended low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 130, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.11.034
  18. Pavithra, P., Srinivasula Reddy, M., Dinakar, P., Hanumantha Rao, B., Satpathy, B. K., & Mohanty, A. N. (2016). A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.05.041
  19. Pratama, N. A., & Desimaliana, E. (2024). Pengaruh Subtitusi Parsial Limbah Bata Ringan terhadap Kuat Tekan Mortar Geopolimer. RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknil Sipil, 10(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.26760/rekaracana.v10i1.51
  20. Provis, J. L. (2018). Alkali-activated materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2017.02.009
  21. Rizka, M. N., & Arifin, A. S. (2025). Pemanfaatan Limbah Serbuk Kaca dan Keramik Sanitarypada Pasta Geopolymer Berbahan Dasar FlyAsh. RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 11(3), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.26760/rekaracana.v11i3.291
  22. Sandika, F. G., Desimaliana, E., & Dewi Shima, R. (2025). Pemanfaatan Limbah Kaca Sebagai Substitusi Filler Dalam Campuran Mortar Geopolimer. RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 11(01), 52–62
  23. Wang, Q., Guo, H., Yu, T., Yuan, P., Deng, L., & Zhang, B. (2022). Utilization of Calcium Carbide Residue as Solid Alkali for Preparing Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers: Dependence of Compressive Strength and Microstructure on Calcium Carbide Residue, Water Content and Curing Temperature. Materials, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030973
  24. Widyaningsih, E., Herbudiman, B., & Fauzi, F. F. (2023). Evaluasi Pengaruh Variasi Molaritas dan Rasio Alkali Aktivator terhadap Kuat Tekan Beton Geopolimer. RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknil Sipil, 8(3), 176. https://doi.org/10.26760/rekaracana.v8i3.176

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.