Pemanfaatan Sumber Daya Alam pada Kawasan Rawan Bencana untuk Kegiatan Pariwisata


Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Submitted: 29-12-2016
Published: 29-08-2017
Section: Articles
Fulltext PDF Tell your colleagues Email the author

After the eruption of Mount Merapi in 2010, tourism activities in Umbulharjo Village and Kepuharjo Village covered volcano tour, live in, camping and so forth. As the volcano tour grows, the number of visitors has increased but the daily routines of the local community have remained unchanged instead of drastically shifting to the tourism sector. Considering the importance of natural resources for tourism development, the joint utilization of them has created multiple overlapping functionalities. This research aims to assess the utilization of natural resources in disaster-prone areas for tourism activities. The study engaged a descriptive qualitative method with purposive and snowballing methods. The results showed some groupings of natural resources utilization based on the typology of goods and services, the disaster-prone locations, and abundant exploitation in their usage. The proposed management aimed to maintain their sustainable benefits either for supporting the tourism activities or the others.


tourism; utilization; natural resources

  1. Finesse Shafina Elwizan 
    Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  2. Maya Damayanti 
    Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  1. Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Sleman. (2014). Rencana Kegiatan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Sleman Tahun 2014. Sleman
  2. Briassoulis, H. (2002). Sustainable tourism and the question of the commons. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4), 1065–1085. doi:10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00021-X
  3. Briassoulis, H. (2015). Tourism and Common Pool Resources. In C. M. Hall, S. Gossling, & D. Scott (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Tourism and Sustainability (pp. 92–104). London, UK and New York, USA: Routledge
  4. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(June), 1243–1248. doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  5. Hasanudin, A. (2010). Inilah Kerugian Materiil Dampak Letusan Merapi. Retrieved from
  6. Healy, R. G. (1994). The “Common Pool” Problem in Tourism Landscapes. Annals of Tourism Research, 21(3), 596–611
  7. Indriastuti, W., & Muktiali, M. (2015). Commons Dilemma Pada Pengelolaan Daerah Irigasi Kapilaler, Kabupaten Klaten. Jurnal Wilayah Dan Lingkungan, 3(2), 105–120. doi:10.14710/jwl.3.2.105-120
  8. Kline, J. D. (2001). Tourism and Natural Resource Management: A General Overview of Research and Issues. United States Departement of Agriculture, Januari, 1–28. Retrieved from
  9. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from
  10. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Michigan: University of Michigan Press
  11. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (1990). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumberdaya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 1990, No. 49. Jakarta: Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia
  12. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (1994). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 tahun 1994 tentang Pengusaha Pariwisata Alam di Zona Pemanfaatan Taman Nasional, Taman Hutan Raya, dan Taman Wisata Alam. Jakarta: Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia
  13. Sharpley, R. (2000). Tourism and Sustainable Development: Exploring the Theoretical Divide. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/09669580008667346