skip to main content

Transformasi Lanskap dan Layanan Ekosistem Budaya di Area Peri-Urban: Wisata Alam dan Permukiman di Bandung Selatan

*Medria Shekar Rani orcid  -  Sekolah Arsitektur, Perencanaan, dan Pengembangan Kebijakan, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Peri-urban provides complementary urban ecosystem services when green areas in cities are decreasing due to densification. However, land cover change in the area from natural landscapes to agriculture and settlements affects the ecosystem's capacity to provide services. This study aims to identify landscape transformation using a model and analyze its effects on cultural ecosystem services at Kawah Putih (White Crater) nature-based tourism destination area in the peri-urban in South Bandung, Indonesia. This study also analyzes how cultural ecosystem services and the increasing demand for new settlements in the area have influenced tourist visitation. Landscape change in the area (1989-2019) was identified from mapsdeveloped from Landsat imagery, using the Land Change Modeler (LCM) module in Terrset. A spatial assessment of offered cultural ecosystem services was then conducted using three indicators based on the land cover change near Kawah Putih. It is found that the composition of developed areas in the district has increased from 6.09% to 10.79% in 30 years. The quality of cultural ecosystem service has decreased, which is arguably influenced by the landscape alteration in the area. However, there was an increasing trend in the number of tourists (2016-2019) despite the deterioration of landscape quality. It is argued that the result is influenced by the visitors' perception of the landscape in the case study area. The rapid land cover change in the area was affected by the nearby city's growth, in which the tourism industry is one of the elements of such transformation.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Copyright Transfer Agreement
Copyright Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type Copyright Transfer Agreement
  Download (190KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: cultural ecosystem services; landscape transformation; peri-urban; tourism
Funding: Kementrian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi

Article Metrics:

  1. Arianti, D. (2014). Pengaruh sektor pariwisata terhadap perekonomian dan keruangan Kota Bukittinggi (pendekatan analisis input output). Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 2(4), 183–196. doi: 10.14710/pwk.v12i4.13502
  2. Badan Informasi Geospasial (BIG). (2018). DEMNAS. Retrieved from https://tanahair.indonesia.go.id/demnas/#/
  3. Champbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2011). Introduction to remote sensing (5th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press
  4. Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., … Von Der Dunk, A. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(23), 8812–8819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109
  5. de la Barrera, F., Henríquez, C., Coulombié, F., Dobbs, C., & Salazar, A. (2018). Periurbanization and conservation pressures over remnants of native vegetation: impact on ecosystem services for a Latin-American capital city. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 4(1), 21–32. doi: 10.1515/cass-2018-0003
  6. Douglas, I. (2012). Peri-urban ecosystems and societies: Transitional zones and contrasting values. In D. McGregor & D. Simon (Eds.), The peri-urban interface: Approaches to sustainable natural and human resource use (pp. 18–29). London: Rouledge. doi: 10.4324/9781849775878
  7. Eastman, J. R. (2006). Guide to GIS and image processing. Worcester: Clark University
  8. Gatri, G. S. (2018). Pengaruh produk wisata terhadap kepuasan wisatawan: Studi pada wisatawan Wana Wisata Kawah Putih Bandung. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
  9. Gerhard, P.-H., Lasco, R., Bohensky, E., Domingos, T., Guhl, A., Lundberg, J., & Zurek, M. (2005). Chapter 7: Drivers of ecosystem change. In The Millenium Ecosystems Assessment Series (MEA). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Scenarios. Volume 2
  10. Google Street View. (2016). Google Street View pada kawasan Kawah Putih. Diakses 5 Juli 2020
  11. Google Street View. (2019). Google Street View pada kawasan Kawah Putih. Diakses 5 Juli 2020
  12. Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2018). CICES V5. 1. Guidance on the application of the revised structure. In Fabis Consulting. Nottingham
  13. Hedblom, M., Andersson, E., & Borgström, S. (2017). Flexible land-use and undefined governance: From threats to potentials in peri-urban landscape planning. Land Use Policy, 63, 523–527. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.022
  14. Helmer, E. H., Ruzycki, T. S., Benner, J., Voggesser, S. M., Scobie, B. P., Park, C., … Ramnarine, S. (2012). Detailed maps of tropical forest types are within reach: Forest tree communities for Trinidad and Tobago mapped with multiseason Landsat and multiseason fine-resolution imagery. Forest Ecology and Management, 279, 147–166. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.016
  15. Kangas, A., Korhonen, K. T., Packalen, T., & Vauhkonen, J. (2018). Sources and types of uncertainties in the information on forest-related ecosystem services. Forest Ecology and Management, 427, 7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.056
  16. Kosanic, A., & Petzold, J. (2020). A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Ecosystem Services, 45. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168
  17. Le, D., Scott, N., Becken, S., & Connolly, R. M. (2019). Tourists’ aesthetic assessment of environmental changes, linking conservation planning to sustainable tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(10), 1477–1494. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1632869
  18. Linke, J., McDermid, G. J., Pape, A. D., McLane, A. J., Laskin, D. N., Hall-Beyer, M., & Franklin, S. E. (2009). The influence of patch-delineation mismatches on multi-temporal landscape pattern analysis. Landscape Ecology, 24(2), 157–170. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9290-z
  19. Mat-Som, A. P., & Bader-Badarneh, M. (2011). Tourist satisfaction and repeat visitation; toward a new comprehensive model. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 50, 1106–1113. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1076526
  20. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well being: synthesis. Washington: Island Press
  21. Mngumi, L. E. (2019). Socio-ecological resilience to climate change effects in peri-urban areas: insights from the Pugu and Kazimzumbwi forest reserves of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. GeoJournal, 86(1), 339–355. doi: 10.1007/s10708-019-10071-9
  22. Pratiwi, W. D., Nagari, B. K., & Jamalianuri, J. (2019). Sustainable settlement development: Land use change in Lakeside Tourism of Bandung. KnE Social Sciences, 883–897. doi: 10.18502/kss.v3i21.5019
  23. PT Perhutani Unit III Jawa Barat (2019). Laporan Harian Kawah Putih PT Perhutani Unit III Jawa Barat
  24. Putt, A. E., MacIsaac, E. A., Herunter, H. E., Cooper, A. B., & Selbie, D. T. (2019). Eutrophication forcings on a peri-urban lake ecosystem: Context for integrated watershed to airshed management. PLoS ONE, 14(7), 1–21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219241
  25. Slámová, M., Jancura, P., & Modranský, J. (2018). The quality assessment of forests in the cadastral district of zvolen (Slovakia). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(1), 183–194. doi: 10.11118/actaun201866010183
  26. Soepomo, S. R. F., Rahmafitria, F., & Daluarti, M. H. C. (2018). Pengembangan program pelibatan masyarakat di Wana Wisata Kawah Putih. Journal of Indonesian Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 1(1), 80–94
  27. Spyra, M., La Rosa, D., Zasada, I., Sylla, M., & Shkaruba, A. (2020). Governance of ecosystem services trade-offs in peri-urban landscapes. Land Use Policy, 95(October 2019), 104617. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104617
  28. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations. In P. Kumar (Ed.), Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. London and Washington: Earthscan. doi: 10.1108/meq.2011.08322bae.003
  29. Thiele, J., Albert, C., Hermes, J., & von Haaren, C. (2020). Assessing and quantifying offered cultural ecosystem services of German river landscapes. Ecosystem Services, 42(February), 101080. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101080
  30. Tieskens, K. F., Van Zanten, B. T., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2018). Aesthetic appreciation of the cultural landscape through social media: An analysis of revealed preference in the Dutch river landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177(June 2017), 128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.002
  31. Toure, S. I., Stow, D. A., Shih, H., Weeks, J., & Lopez-Carr, D. (2018). Land cover and land use change analysis using multi-spatial resolution data and object-based image analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 210, 259–268. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.023
  32. United States Geological Survey. (1989). LANDSAT 4-5 TM. Scene ID: LT05_L2SP_122065_19890706_20200916_02_T1. (6 Juli 1989). Retrieved from USGS Explorer http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov
  33. United States Geological Survey. (2019). LANDSAT 8 OLI/TIRS. Scene ID: LC08_L2SP_122065_20190911_20200826_02_T1. (11 September 2019). Retrieved from USGS Explorer http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov
  34. Urban, D. L., & Wallin, D. (2017). Introduction to Markov models. In S. E. Gergel & M. G. Turner (Eds.), Learning landscape ecology: A practical guide to concepts and techniques (Second). Springer-Verlag New York
  35. Woltjer, J. (2014). A global review on peri-urban development and planning. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 25(1), 1–16. doi: 10.5614/jpwk.2014.25.1.1

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.