Analisis Pemangku Kepentingan dalam Pengembangan Kawasan Cagar Budaya sebagai Destinasi Wisata Kota Pontianak

*Putu Ayu Vindytha Amanda Putri  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Eko Budi Santoso orcid scopus  -  Departemen Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Indonesia
Received: 14 Jun 2019; Published: 31 Dec 2020.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.8.3.202-213 View
Copyright Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type Copyright Transfer Agreement
  Download (3MB)    Indexing metadata
Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Cultural heritage area in Pontianak needs to be preserved by developing and transforming it as a tourism destination. To do this development, it involves some groups of people or organization as acting stakeholders. The study aimed to identify their involvement and relationship in the management of and strategies for cultural heritage area in Pontianak City. The study used data which was analyzed using qualitative descriptive and stakeholder analysis methods. Then the results were incorporated into pentahelix modeling to explain further the roles and functions of each stakeholder. The results identified those acting stakeholders were of the Local Development Planning Agency of Pontianak City, the Youth, Sports and Tourism Agency of Pontianak City, the Pontianak City Tourism Promotion Board and the East Pontianak District Government with high influence and high importance. The community leaders such as historians and tourists were the stakeholders with low influence and high interests. Lastly, travel agents and tourism supporting business actors were the stakeholders with low influence and low interests.

 

 

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Keywords: cultural heritage; pentahelix; stakeholder; tourism destination

Article Metrics:

  1. Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. doi: 10.1080/14719030410001675722
  2. Elvira, Zain, Z., Mulyani, R. E., & Rudiyono. (2018). Identifikasi bangunan masjid Jami’ Keraton Pontianak sebagai upaya konservasi bangunan cagar budaya. In Seminar Nasional Penerapan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi 2018 (pp. 137–149). Pontianak: Universitas Tanjungpura
  3. Handayani, F., & Warsono, H. (2017). Analisis peran stakeholders dalam pengembangan objek wisata Pantai Karang Jahe di Kabupaten Rembang. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 6(3), 40–53. doi: 10.14710/jppmr.v6i3.16543
  4. Hidayah, N., Hutagalung, S. S., & Hermawan, D. (2019). Analisis peran stakeholder dalam pengembangan wisata talang air peninggalan kolonial Belanda di Kelurahan Pajaresuk Kabupaten Pringsewu. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 7(1), 55–71. doi: 10.31289/publika.v7i1.2179
  5. Junaid, I. (2019). Model sinergi unsur pentaheliks pariwisata dalam pengelolaan destinasi wisata Kota Parepare dan Kabupaten Bone. Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 21(1), 22–33. doi: 10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v21i1.17016
  6. Maitriwaruni, M. D. A. (2015). Analisis penerapan stakeholder mapping dan pengaruhnya pada keberlanjutan bisnis perusahaan: Studi kasus pada perusahaan farmasi - PT Sandoz Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia
  7. Millar, S. (1989). Heritage management for heritage tourism. Tourism Management, 10(1), 9–14. doi: 10.1016/0261-5177(89)90030-7
  8. Nainggolan, M., Ardika, I. W., Ardhana, I. K., & Setiawan, I. K. (2020). Pentahelix model application for tourism development strategy. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 6(2), 12–18. doi: 10.21744/ijllc.v6n2.864
  9. Nurulwahida, S., Syafrieyana, Y., & Sukmana, O. (2020). Collaboration with pentahelix model in developing Kajoetangan Heritage tourism in Malang city. Journal of Local Government Issues, 3(1), 1–17. doi: 10.22219/logos.v3i1.10699
  10. Prasiasa, D. P. (2013). Destinasi pariwisata berbasis masyarakat. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika
  11. Sugiarti, R., Warto, W., & Sutirto, T. W. (2019). Partisipasi pemangku kepentingan dalam mendukung revitalisasi aset wisata pusaka di Kawasan World Heritage Sangiran. Cakra Wisata Jurnal Pariwisata dan Budaya, 20(2), 17–34
  12. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan r&d. Bandung: PT. Alfabeta
  13. Sumarto, R. H., Sumartono, S., Muluk, M. R., & Nuh, M. (2020). Penta-Helix and Quintuple-Helix in the management of tourism villages in Yogyakarta City. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 14(1), 46–57. doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v14i1.5
  14. Syaifullah, M., & Wibowo, B. (2016). Pemanfaatan benda cagar budaya sebagai potensi pariwisata dan ekonomi kreatif bagi masyarakat sekitar di Kota Pontianak Kalimantan Barat. Sejarah dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya, 10(2), 222–233
  15. Wibowo, B., & Syaifulloh, M. (2014). Optimalisasi Kraton Kadariyah dalam pengembangan pariwisata di Kota Pontianak Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Edukasi, 1(1), 11–27. doi: 10.31571/edukasi.v12i1.187
  16. Widodo, M. L., Soekmadi, R., & Arifin, H. S. (2018). Analisis stakeholders dalam pengembangan ekowisata di taman nasional Betung Kerihun Kabupaten Kapuas Hulu. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan, 8(1), 55–61. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.8.1.55-61
  17. Yuningsih, T., Darmi, T., & Sulandari, S. (2019). Model pentahelik dalam pengembangan pariwisata di Kota Semarang. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations), 3(2), 84–93. doi: 10.26740/jpsi.v3n2.p84-93

Last update: 2021-04-20 15:52:39

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-04-20 15:52:41

No citation recorded.