Analisis Tipologi Variabel Strategis pada Pengembangan Kawasan Ekowisata Waduk Kedung Ombo

*Nafiah Ariyani  -  Universitas Sahid, Indonesia
Akhmad Fauzi orcid scopus  -  Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia
Received: 29 Oct 2018; Published: 31 Dec 2019.
Open Access
Citation Format:

Kedung Ombo Reservoir area which is rich in natural resources has the potential to be developed as an ecotourism area. However, institutional issues and policy focus biases are factors that hamper the development of this region. This study aims to identify strategic variables and find a description of the interdependence relationship between these variables. Research data were obtained through focus group discussions and workshops. Data analysis using Micmac method. The results of the study determine 31 (thirty one) variables as strategic variables in the development of the Kedung Ombo ecotourism area which are grouped in the following typologies: 1). Determinant variables, consisting of: regulations, special permits; 2) Relay variable, consisting of: community involvement, tourism business potential, infrastructure readiness, tourism awareness, transportation, tourists, tourist attractions, accommodation, tourism promotion, tourism services, private investment, governance, coordination, role of apparatus and information; 3) Autonomous variables, namely: local entrepreneurial ability, developer's understanding of local norms, natural beauty, environmental carrying capacity, and accessibility; 4) The dependent variables are: tax income, retribution income, funds for the community, preservation of local wisdom, expansion of employment opportunities, conservation of reservoir functions, forest preservation, welfare improvement, and poverty reduction. This finding also determines the order of priority scale which is very useful for policy makers to direct the policy focus to the most important variables in developing Kedung Ombo ecotourism in a sustainable manner.



ecotourism; Kedung Ombo; micmac; strategic variables

Article Metrics:

  1. Ambrosio-Albalá, M., Martín Lozano, J. M., Pérez Hernández, P. P., Martin-Lozano, J. M., & Perez-Hernández, P. P. (2009). Prospective Structural Analysis : An application to Rural Development Strategies. 83rd Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, (April), 1–17.
  2. Anup, K. (2016). Ecotourism and Its Role in Sustainable Development of Nepal Ecotourism and Its Role in Sustainable Development of Nepal. Tourism - From Empirical Research Towards Practical Application Conservation, (May).
  3. Arcade, Godet, Meunier, R. (2003). Stuctural analysis with the MICMAC method & Actors’ strategy with MACTOR method. Futures Research Methodology. Retrieved from
  4. Arias, M. L. B. (2016). Structural Analysis of Strategic Variables through MicMac Use: Case Study. Miditerraen Journal of Social Science, 7.
  5. Beritelli, P., Bieger, T., & Laesser, C. (2007). Destination governance: Using corporate governance theories as a foundation for effective destination management. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 96–107.
  6. del Mar Delgado-Serrano, M., Vanwildemeersch, P., London, S., Ortiz-Guerrero, C. E., Semerena, R. E., & Rojas, M. (2016). Adapting prospective structural analysis to strengthen sustainable management and capacity building in community-based natural resource management contexts. Ecology and Society, 21(2).
  7. Diamantis, D., & Roches, L. (2017). The Concept of Ecotourism : Evolution and Trends The Concept of Ecotourism : Evolution and Trends. Current Issues in Tourism ·, (August).
  8. Díaz, M. R., & Espino-Rodríguez, T. F. (2016). Determining the sustainability factors and performance of a tourism destination from the stakeholders’ perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(9).
  9. Durance, P., Gerber, A., Bassaler, N., Menant, I., Monti, R., & Richou, S. (2006). Strategic Foresight La Prospective Problems and Methods. Cahiers Du LIPSOR, (20), 83.
  10. Elmsalmi, M. (2013). Risks Prioritization in Global Supply Networks Using MICMAC Method : A Real Case Study, (May 2014).
  11. Erdogan, I., & Erdogan, N. (2014). A Critical Evaluation of Ecotourism. In FORESTERS’ ASSOCIATION OF TURKEY OTHER PUBLICATIONS SERIES NO:10.
  12. Godet, M. (2000). The Art of Scenarios and Strategic Planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 65(1), 3–22.
  13. Hutagalung, E.S and Sabar, A. (2015). Model Prakiraan Debit Air Dalam Rangka Optimalisasi Pengelolaan Waduk Kedung Ombo. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 21, 77–86. Retrieved from www.
  14. Isnaini, A. Pengembangan Wisata Pintu Air Waduk Kedung Ombo (2008). Retrieved from
  15. Iswati, Y. (2018). Agrowisata Sebagai Pengembangan Wisata Sebagai Pengembangan Kawasan Waduk Kedung Ombo, (September).
  16. Mckinney, T. (2017). Ecotourism. The International Encyclopedia of Primatology., (October).
  17. Nasrudin, M. Pemanfaatan Objek Wisata Waduk Kedung Ombo Sebagai Sumber Belajar Outdoor Study Mata Pelajaran Geografi Pada Siswa Kelas X IPS Di SMA Negeri 1 Godong Kabupaten Grobogan Tahun 2017 (2017). Retrieved from
  18. Ngatwanto. “The Freshwater world” Waduk Kedung Ombo Sebagai Pusat Wista Edukasi Ekosistem Air Tawar Dengan Pendekatan Neo Vernacular Design (2018). Retrieved from PUBLIKASI.pdf
  19. North, D., C. (1990). Institutional, Instituional Change and Economic Performance. (C. U. Press, Ed.). Academic Foundation, 2006.
  20. Sindiga, I. (2010). Alternative Tourism and Sustainable Development in Kenya. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, (January 2015), 37–41.
  21. Stratigea, A., & Papadopoulou, C. – A. (2013). Foresight Analysis at the Regional Level - A Participatory Methodological Framework. Journal of Management and Strategy, 4(2), 1–16.
  22. Zuo, B., Gusoy, D., & Wall, G. (2017). Residents’ support for red tourism in China: The moderating effect of central government. Annals of Tourism Research, 64, 51–63.