DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.11.2.156-171

Studi terkait Inovasi Sosial untuk Pengurangan Risiko Bencana di Indonesia

*Cecilia Nonifili Yuanita  -  Sekolah Arsitektur, Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Kebijakan, Institut Teknologi, Indonesia
Sheila Hauna Arifa  -  Sekolah Arsitektur, Perencanaan, dan Pengembangan Kebijakan, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Inovasi sosial mengalami peningkatan minat selama beberapa tahun terakhir, khususnya pada bidang perencanaan kota. Dengan kompleksitas persoalan pada banyak perkotaan di Indonesia, seperti kepadatan penduduk dan pesatnya urbanisasi yang dapat membuat terdegradasinya lingkungan dan semakin tingginya risiko terhadap bencana, maka dibutuhkan penanggulangan bencana yang memadai untuk mengurangi risikonya. Banyak studi menunjukkan bahwa paduan antara sains dan kebijakan merupakan kunci keberhasilan dari pengurangan risiko bencana, yakni dengan langkah-langkah yang inovatif. Oleh karena itu, studi ini bertujuan untuk meninjau inovasi sosial yang berkembang di Indonesia untuk pengurangan risiko bencana. Hasil tinjauan menunjukkan sudah terdapat berbagai jenis inovasi sosial dari tingkat nasional hingga lokal yang dapat dikembangkan lebih baik dan dapat menjadi dasar ataupun rekomendasi bagi pemerintah daerah dalam melakukan perencanaan pembangunan kota dan tata ruangnya.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: inovasi sosial; penanggulangan bencana; pengurangan risiko bencana; perencanaan kota

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Kemajuan Perencanaan dan Dampak Potensial Pembangunan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Surya Terapung Skala Utilitas di Waduk Cirata, Jawa Barat Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga Berbasis Circular Economy di Tingkat Desa: Pendekatan Sistem Dinamik Faktor Pendukung Keefektifan Program Denpasar Smart City dalam Ketangguhan Pandemi More recent articles
  1. Albris, K., Lauta, K. C., & Raju, E. (2020). Disaster Knowledge Gaps: Exploring the Interface Between Science and Policy for Disaster Risk Reduction in Europe. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00250-5
  2. Bambang Siswanto, A., & Afif Salim, M. (2018). KRITERIA DASAR PERENCANAAN STRUKTUR BANGUNAN TAHAN GEMPA. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 11
  3. Bragaglia, F. (2021). Social innovation as a ‘magic concept’ for policy-makers and its implications for urban governance. Planning Theory, 20(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220934832
  4. Busco, C., & Quattrone, P. (2018). Performing business and social innovation through accounting inscriptions: An introduction. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.002
  5. Castro-Arce, K., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010
  6. Charisma, A., Taryana, E., Saputra, D. I., Misuari, M. B., Setiawan, A., & Dharmawan, F. (2020). Implementasi Sistem Komunikasi FM Pada Prototype Pendeteksi Dini Gempa. PRotek : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro, 7(2), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.33387/protk.v7i2.1812
  7. Christmann, G. B. (2020). Introduction: struggling with innovations. Social innovations and conflicts in urban development and planning. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639396
  8. CSTS. (2020). Disasters and Poverty: Natural Disasters Disproportionately Affect the World’s Low-Income Countries. https://www.cstsonline.org/assets/media/documents/CSTS_FS_Disasters_and_Poverty_Natural_Disasters_Disproportionally_Affect_the_Worlds_low_income.pdf
  9. Dabral, A., Bajwa, S., Shioyama, S., Chatterjee, R., & Shaw, R. (2021). Social Innovation Hackathon for Driving Innovation in Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR). IDRiM Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5595/001c.28876
  10. Easterday, M. W., Gerber, E. M., & Rees Lewis, D. G. (2018). Social Innovation Networks: A New Approach to Social Design Education and Impact. Design Issues, 34(2), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00486
  11. Eichler, G., & Schwarz, E. (2019). What Sustainable Development Goals Do Social Innovations Address? A Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Social Innovation Literature. Sustainability, 11(2), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020522
  12. Fougère, M., & Meriläinen, E. (2021). Exposing three dark sides of social innovation through critical perspectives on resilience. Industry and Innovation, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1709420
  13. GADRRRES. (2022). Kerangka Kerja Satuan Pendidikan Aman Bencana (SPAB) yang Komprehensif Tahun 2022-2030. https://spab.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Final-Bahasa-CSSF.pdf
  14. Godin, B. (2008). Innovation: The History of a Category. www.csiic.ca
  15. Godin, B. (2012). Social Innovation: Utopias of Innovation from c.1830 to the Present (No. 11). www.csiic.ca
  16. Gupta, S., Kumar, V., & Karam, E. (2020). New-age technologies-driven social innovation: What, how, where, and why? Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.09.009
  17. Hadi, S. (2019). Aceh and Nias in 2004, the earthquake in Yogyakarta in 2006, the earthquake in West Sumatra in 2009, and eruption of Mount Merapi in 2010, the post-The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning. In The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning: Vol. III (Issue 1)
  18. Hidayah, E., Halik, G., Indarto, I., & Khaulan, D. W. (2022). Flood hazard mapping of the Welang river, Pasuruan, East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249676.2022.2114025
  19. Holderness, T., & Turpin, E. (2015). From Social Media to GeoSocial Intelligence: Crowdsourcing Civic Co-management for Flood Response in Jakarta, Indonesia. In Social Media for Government Services (pp. 115–133). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27237-5_6
  20. IFRCRCS. (2016). Memperkuat Undang-Undang dan Pengurangan Risiko Bencana (PRB) di Indonesia. https://disasterlaw.ifrc.org/media/1342
  21. Izumi, T., Shaw, R., Djalante, R., Ishiwatari, M., & Komino, T. (2019). Disaster risk reduction and innovations. Progress in Disaster Science, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100033
  22. Izumi, T., Shaw, R., Ishiwatari, M., Djalante, R., & Komino, T. (2019). 30 innovations for disaster risk reduction by IRIDeS, Keio University, the University of Tokyo, UNU-IAS, CWS Japan
  23. Joshi, N., Wende, W., & Tiwari, P. C. (2022). Urban Planning as an Instrument for Disaster Risk Reduction in the Uttarakhand Himalayas. Mountain Research and Development, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00048.1
  24. Krstikj, A. (2021). Social Innovation in the Undergraduate Architecture Studio. Societies, 11(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11010026
  25. Lassa, J. A., Boli, Y., Nakmofa, Y., Fanggidae, S., Ofong, A., & Leonis, H. (2018). Twenty years of community-based disaster risk reduction experience from a dryland village in Indonesia. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.502
  26. Lima, E., & Nelson, R. (2021). Social innovation, social bricolage, and brokerage after a disaster in córrego d’antas. Revista de Administracao Publica, 55(3), 594–624. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200123
  27. Margaret, R., Yanti, K., Ade, A., Saputra, I., & Hadid, M. (2022). Bio-pore and Rainwater Harvesting for Flood Reduction (Study Case: PGRI residence, Balikpapan) (Vol. 2, Issue 3). https://journal.amikveteran.ac.id/index.php/kreatif
  28. Marleny, F. D., & Mambang. (2022). Sosial Media Analisis Berbasis NLP Untuk Mempercepat Tanggap Bencana Banjir. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi, 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.38204/tematik.v9i1
  29. Mase, L. Z., Sugianto, N., & Refrizon. (2021). Seismic hazard microzonation of Bengkulu City, Indonesia. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-021-00178-y
  30. McAdoo, B. G., Dengler, L., Prasetya, G., & Titov, V. (2006). Smong: How an oral history saved thousands on Indonesia’s Simeulue Island during the December 2004 and March 2005 tsunamis. Earthquake Spectra, 22(SUPPL. 3). https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2204966
  31. Morgado, S. (2021). Urban rehabilitation, social innovation, and new working spaces in lisbon. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111925
  32. Moulaert, F., Alaez Aller, R., & Cooke, P. (1990). Integrated Area Development and Efficay of Local Action. IFRESI/CNRS
  33. Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. In Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 145–162)
  34. Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. In Language Teaching Research (Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 129–132). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
  35. Onsongo, E. (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship and social innovation at the base of the pyramid: the case of M-Pesa in Kenya. Industry and Innovation, 26(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1409104
  36. Paidakaki, A., Moulaert, F., & van den Broeck, P. (2018). 1.1 Exploring the Politico-institutional Dimension of Social Innovation to Repoliticize Urban Governance Arrangements. ISR-Forschungsberichte, 47, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1553/ISR_FB047s11
  37. Phiri, Y. V. A., Aydin, K., Mkandawire, A. A., & Parham, H. R. (2019). Urban Planning and Urban Disaster Resilience: Effects of Poor Urban Planning and Development in the Cities of Malawi. International Congress on Urban Studies
  38. Pique, J. M., Miralles, F., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2019). Areas of innovation in cities: The evolution of 22@Barcelona. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 10(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2019.098227
  39. Pollitt, C., & Hupe, P. (2011). Talking About Government. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.532963
  40. Portales, L. (2019). Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13456-3
  41. Prasetyo, B. (2019). Kearifan Lokal sebagai Basis Mitigasi Bencana. In Peran matematika,sain dan teknologi dalam kebencanaan (pp. 111–129). Universitas Terbuka. http://repository.ut.ac.id/8866/
  42. Priana, A., & Marfai, M. A. (2019). Chapter 3: Remote Sensing and GIS for Tsunami Inundation Model. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337731434_Chapter_3_Remote_Sensing_and_GIS_for_Tsunami_Inundation_Model
  43. Ramdhani, A., Ali, M., Uin, R., Gunung, S., & Bandung, D. (2014). Writing a Literature Review Research Paper: A step-by-step approach Multiple Representation in Chemistry Education View project two second order confirmatory factor analysis of corporate culture View project. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311735510
  44. Ritchie, H., Rosado, P., & Roser, M. (2022). Natural Disasters. https://ourworldindata.org/natural-disasters#link-between-poverty-and-deaths-from-natural-disasters
  45. Rivera, C., & Wamsler, C. (2014). Integrating climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction and urban planning: A review of Nicaraguan policies and regulations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 7, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.008
  46. Roblek, V., Bach, M. P., Meško, M., & Bertoncel, T. (2020). Best practices of the social innovations in the framework of the e-government evolution. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(53), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2019/53/275
  47. Sair, A. (2015). Strategi Membangun Kota Tangguh Bencana Melalui Program Pengelolaan Sampah Mandiri Berbasis Komunitas Di Kota Surabaya. International Seminar on Disaster., 199–219. https://erepository.uwks.ac.id/228/
  48. Sanchez-Sepulveda, M., Fonseca, D., Franquesa, J., & Redondo, E. (2019). Virtual interactive innovations applied for digital urban transformations. Mixed approach. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.08.016
  49. Sanderson, D. (2000). Cities, disasters and livelihoods. Environment and Urbanization, 12(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780001200208
  50. Sarkki, S., Parpan, T., Melnykovych, M., Zahvoyska, L., Derbal, J., Voloshyna, N., & Nijnik, M. (2019). Beyond participation! Social innovations facilitating movement from authoritative state to participatory forest governance in Ukraine. Landscape Ecology, 34(7), 1601–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00787-x
  51. Schlein, L. (2016). UN: Most Deaths From Natural Disasters Occur in Poor Countries. https://www.voanews.com/a/un-says-most-deaths-from-natural-disasters-occur-in-poor-countries/3548871.html
  52. Schönfeld, K. C. von, & Ferreira, A. (2021). Urban planning and european innovation policy: Achieving sustainability, social inclusion, and economic growth? Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031137
  53. Silvestre, B. S., & Ţîrcă, D. M. (2019). Innovations for sustainable development: Moving toward a sustainable future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.244
  54. Sinaga, T. P. T., Nugroho, A., Lee, Y. W., & Suh, Y. (2011). GIS mapping of tsunami vulnerability: Case study of the Jembrana regency in Bali, Indonesia. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(3), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0741-8
  55. Sri Naryanto, H., Prawiradisastra, F., Ardiyanto, R., Hidayat, W., Teknologi Reduksi Risiko Bencana, P., Teknologi Pengembangan Sumberdaya Wilayah, P., Teknologi Pengembangan Sumberdaya Mineral, P., Pengkajian dan Penerapan, B., Geostech, G., Puspiptek Serpong, K., Tangerang Selatan, K., & Banten, P. (2020). ANALISIS PASCA BENCANA TANAH LONGSOR 1 JANUARI 2020 DAN EVALUASI PENATAAN KAWASAN DI KECAMATAN SUKAJAYA, KABUPATEN BOGOR. In Jurnal Geografi Gea (Vol. 20, Issue 2)
  56. Trejo-Rangel, M. A. (2022). SOCIAL INNOVATION FOR ENHANCING DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN SÃO LUIZ DO PARAITINGA, SÃO PAULO, BRAZIL. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
  57. UNDRR. (2015). Global Assessment Report for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.undrr.org/publication/global-assessment-report-disaster-risk-reduction-2015
  58. UNDRR. (2020). Poorly planned urban development. https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/risk-drivers/poorly-planned-urban-development
  59. UNISDR. (2005). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. In World Conference on Disaster Reduction. https://www.unisdr.org/2005/wcdr/intergover/official-doc/L-docs/Hyogo-framework-for-action-english.pdf
  60. UNISDR. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.