skip to main content

Hubungan antara Perdagangan, Investasi, PDB, Korupsi, dan Deforestasi di Asia Tenggara: Menguji Hipotesis Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC)

*Mohamad Egi Destiartono  -  Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Mencapai pembangunan berkelanjutan seperti net zero deforestation adalah agenda penting. Studi ini bermaksud mengungkap hubungan antara pertumbuhan ekonomi, keterbukaan perdagangan, investasi, pengendalian terhadap korupsi, dan deforestasi di Asia Tenggara periode 2000 – 2020 dengan mengadopsi kerangka Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). Metode Pooled Mean Group (PMG) dan uji kausalitas Dumitrescu-Hurlin (DH) diaplikasikan untuk mengestimasi hubungan dinamis jangka pendek dan panjang, serta arah kausalitas. Uji akar unit dan kointegrasi juga ditambahkan dalam penelitian ini. Seluruh variabel terintegrasi pada ordo pertama, I(1), dan mereka terkointegrasi. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa hubungan antara PDB per kapita dan deforestasi mengikuti kurva N, bukan EKC tradisional. Deforestasi akan terus berlangsung karena PDB per kapita Asia Tenggara telah melewati titik balik kedua (3.074 USD per capita).Selain itu, foreign direct investment (FDI) dan keterbukaan perdagangan terdeteksi sebagai pendorong deforestasi. Sebaliknya, indeks pengendalian korupsi memiliki pengaruh negatif pada deforestasi. Mendorong pembangunan sekaligus mengurangi laju deforestasi memungkinkan untuk dicapai karena uji DH menunjukkan kausalitas satu arah dari PDB per kapita menuju deforestasi. Studi ini menyarankan untuk memperkuat perdagangan hijau, investasi bersih, penguatan tata kelola, dan pembangunan berkelanjutan dengan tujuan mengurangi laju deforestasi.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext |  Data Analysis
Data dan Hasil Estimasi
Subject
Type Data Analysis
  Download (56KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Asia Tenggara; deforestasi; EKC; keterbukaan perdagangan; korupsi; PDB

Article Metrics:

  1. Acheampong, E. O., Macgregor, C. J., Sloan, S., & Sayer, J. (2019). Deforestation is driven by agricultural expansion in Ghana’s forest reserves. Scientific African, 5(e00146), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00146
  2. Ajanaku, B. A., & Collins, A. R. (2021). Economic growth and deforestation in African countries: Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis applicable? Forest Policy and Economics, 129(May), 102488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102488
  3. Ampon-Wireko, S., Zhou, L., Xu, X., Dauda, L., Mensah, I. A., Larnyo, E., & Baah Nketiah, E. (2021). The relationship between healthcare expenditure, CO2 emissions and natural resources: evidence from developing countries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2021.1979101
  4. Attiaoui, I., Toumi, H., Ammouri, B., & Gargouri, I. (2017). Causality links among renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in Africa: evidence from a panel ARDL-PMG approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(14), 13036–13048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8850-7
  5. Austin, K. G., Schwantes, A., Gu, Y., & Kasibhatla, P. S. (2019). What causes deforestation in Indonesia? Environmental Research Letters, 14(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf6db
  6. Avnimelech, G., & Zelekha, Y. (2014). The impact of corruption on entrepreneurship. International Business Ethics and Growth Opportunities, 42(2), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-7419-6.ch013
  7. Caravaggio, N. (2020). A global empirical re-assessment of the Environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation. Forest Policy and Economics, 119(September), 102282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102282
  8. Carodenuto, S., Merger, E., Essomba, E., Panev, M., Pistorius, T., & Amougou, J. (2015). A methodological framework for assessing agents, proximate drivers and underlying causes of deforestation: Field test results from Southern Cameroon. Forests, 6(1), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6010203
  9. Crespo Cuaresma, J., Danylo, O., Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Obersteiner, M., See, L., & Walsh, B. (2017). Economic development and forest cover: Evidence from satellite data. Scientific Reports, 7(January), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40678
  10. Defries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M., & Hansen, M. (2010). Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience, 3(3), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo756
  11. Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
  12. Ekananda, M. (2014). Analisis Data Time Series untuk Penelitian Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi. Mitra Wacana Media
  13. Ekananda, M. (2022). Role of macroeconomic determinants on the natural resource commodity prices: Indonesia futures volatility. Resources Policy, 78(May), 102815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102815
  14. FAO. (2007). Manual on deforestation, degradation, and fragmentation using Remote Sensing and GIS. In STRENGTHENING MONITORING, ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING ON SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT IN ASIA (GCP/INT/988/JPN) MAR-SFM) (MAR-SFM Working Paper 5 / 2007). http://www.fao.org/3/a-ap163e.pdf
  15. FAO. (2020). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report. In FAO. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315184487-1
  16. FAO and UNEP. (2020). The State of the World’s Forest. Forests, biodiversity and people. In Geographical Review (Vol. 14, Issue 1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en
  17. Faria, W. R., & Almeida, A. N. (2016). Relationship between openness to trade and deforestation: Empirical evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 121, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.014
  18. Gandhi, S., & Jones, T. G. (2019). Identifying mangrove deforestation hotspots in South Asia, Southeast Asia and Asia-Pacific. Remote Sensing, 11(6), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS11060728
  19. Handalani, R. T. (2019). Determinan Deforestasi Negara-Negara Di Kawasan Asia Tenggara Periode 2008-2015. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota, 15(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v15i1.21267
  20. Hill, T. D., Davis, A. P., Roos, J. M., & French, M. T. (2020). Limitations of Fixed-Effects Models for Panel Data. Sociological Perspectives, 63(3), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419863785
  21. Hosonuma, N., Herold, M., De Sy, V., De Fries, R. S., Brockhaus, M., Verchot, L., Angelsen, A., & Romijn, E. (2012). An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environmental Research Letters, 7(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044009
  22. International Union for Conservation of Nature. (2021). Deforestation and Forest Degradation. In Issue Brief (Issue February). https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/species_and_climate_change_issues_brief-2019-12.pdf
  23. Islam, M. S. (2021). Influence of economic growth on environmental pollution in South Asia: a panel cointegration analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 5(3), 951–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-021-00208-5
  24. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
  25. Khuc, Q. Van, Tran, B. Q., Meyfroidt, P., & Paschke, M. W. (2018). Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Vietnam: An exploratory analysis at the national level. Forest Policy and Economics, 90(February), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.02.004
  26. Kustanto, A. (2022). Does Trade Openness Cause Deforestation? A Case Study from Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 19(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.29259/jep.v19i2.15530
  27. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
  28. Lopez, L., & Weber, S. (2017). Testing for Granger causality in panel data. Stata Journal, 17(4), 972–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1801700412
  29. Manivong, K., Phengsavanh, S., Kyophilavong, P., Pommavong, P., Khamvilvanh, K., & Mixayboua, S. (2021). Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for N2O. International Journal of Development Administration Research, 1(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.830503
  30. Nathaniel, S. P., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). Environmental management amidst energy use, urbanization, trade openness, and deforestation: The Nigerian experience. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2037
  31. Ngwira, S., & Watanabe, T. (2019). An analysis of the causes of deforestation in malawi: A case of mwazisi. Land, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/land8030048
  32. Pachmann, A. (2018). Corruption and Deforestation in Indonesia. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 25(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.15181/rfds.v25i2.1745
  33. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
  34. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in The Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Jour, 312, 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae
  35. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., Smith, R. P., & Hashem, M. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Source: Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2670182?origin=JSTOR-pdf
  36. Plata-Rocha, W., Monjardin-Armenta, S. A., Pacheco-Angulo, C. E., Rangel-Peraza, J. G., Franco-Ochoa, C., & Mora-Felix, Z. D. (2021). Proximate and underlying deforestation causes in a tropical basin through specialized consultation and spatial logistic regression modeling. Land, 10(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020186
  37. Rashid Gill, A., Viswanathan, K. K., & Hassan, S. (2018). The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and the environmental problem of the day. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(May), 1636–1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.247
  38. Russell, M. (2020). Forest in South-east Asia; Can they be saved? https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652068/EPRS_BRI(2020)652068_EN.pdf
  39. Thi, L., & Nguyen, N. (2018). Economic Growth and Changes in Forested Areas in Southeast Economic Growth and Changes in Forested Areas in Southeast Asia: Is Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Relevant? Asia: Is Environmental Kuznets Curve Still Relevant? [Hollins University]. https://digitalcommons.hollins.edu/ughonors
  40. Usman, O., Iorember, P. T., & Olanipekun, I. O. (2019). Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in india: The effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(13), 13390–13400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04696-z
  41. Waluyo, E. A., & Terawaki, T. (2016). Environmental kuznets curve for deforestation in Indonesia: An ARDL bounds testing approach. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 37(3), 87–108
  42. Wehkamp, J., Koch, N., Lübbers, S., & Fuss, S. (2018). Governance and deforestation — a meta-analysis in economics. Ecological Economics, 144(May 2017), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.030
  43. Westerlund, J. (2005). New simple tests for panel cointegration. Econometric Reviews, 24(3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930500243019
  44. Yameogo, C. E. W. (2021). Globalization, urbanization, and deforestation linkage in Burkina Faso. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(17), 22011–22021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12071-6

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.