Validasi Instrumen Indeks Kota Berkelanjutan dengan Analisis Faktor

Yasid Saleh; Mohamad Khairul Anuar Ghazali; Hanifah Mahat; Mohmadisa Hashim; Nasir Nayan; Suhendro Suhendro

doi:10.14710/jwl.10.3.246-266

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.10.3.246-266

Validasi Instrumen Indeks Kota Berkelanjutan dengan Analisis Faktor

Yasid Saleh - Department of Water Resources Management, Budhi Cakra Consultant, Jalan Sukanagara, No. 20 B, Antapani Kidul, Bandung, Bandung City, West Java, Indonesia 40391, Malaysia

Mohamad Khairul Anuar Ghazali - Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia

Hanifah Mahat - Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia

Mohmadisa Hashim - Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia

Nasir Nayan - Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia

*Suhendro Suhendro - Konsultan Budicakra, Bandung, Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{JWL14132,
    author = {Yasid Saleh and Mohamad Khairul Anuar Ghazali and Hanifah Mahat and Mohmadisa Hashim and Nasir Nayan and Suhendro Suhendro},
    title = {Validasi Instrumen Indeks Kota Berkelanjutan dengan Analisis Faktor},
    journal = {Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan},
  volume = {10},
    number = {3},
    year = {2022},
    keywords = {confirmation factor analysis; exploration factor analysis; heritage city; sustainability index},
    abstract = {Creating sustainable cities and communities is one of the key goals in the Sustainable Development Agenda by 2030. To implement this goal, a measurement instrument needs to be developed to assess the extent of sustainability of each city, including heritage cities. Therefore, this study aims to validate the heritage city sustainability index instrument in Malaysia using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmation factor analysis (CFA) methods. The survey form was distributed to 1000 respondents living in 10 heritage cities throughout Malaysia using a simple random sampling technique. For the purpose of item identification and grouping, EFA and CFA analysis were used. The results of the study have formed and accepted five main constructs of heritage city sustainability in Malaysia namely Economic Prosperity (13 items), Social Well -Being (9 items), Environmental Well -Being (8 items), Heritage Culture (9 items) and The Role of Government and Community (18 items). All items in each construct achieved a good Cronbach Alpha value of above 0.70 and met the normality test requirements. The index value conditions set by Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity in this study also showed satisfactory values. The formation of the five constructs of this study directly demonstrates the connectivity and appropriateness between items according to constructs. The instrument, which has been certified using EFA and CFA techniques, will assist in measuring the level of sustainability of heritage cities in Malaysia.},
   issn = {2407-8751},   pages = {246--266}  doi = {10.14710/jwl.10.3.246-266},
    url = {https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jwl/article/view/14132}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Creating sustainable cities and communities is one of the key goals in the Sustainable Development Agenda by 2030. To implement this goal, a measurement instrument needs to be developed to assess the extent of sustainability of each city, including heritage cities. Therefore, this study aims to validate the heritage city sustainability index instrument in Malaysia using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmation factor analysis (CFA) methods. The survey form was distributed to 1000 respondents living in 10 heritage cities throughout Malaysia using a simple random sampling technique. For the purpose of item identification and grouping, EFA and CFA analysis were used. The results of the study have formed and accepted five main constructs of heritage city sustainability in Malaysia namely Economic Prosperity (13 items), Social Well -Being (9 items), Environmental Well -Being (8 items), Heritage Culture (9 items) and The Role of Government and Community (18 items). All items in each construct achieved a good Cronbach Alpha value of above 0.70 and met the normality test requirements. The index value conditions set by Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity in this study also showed satisfactory values. The formation of the five constructs of this study directly demonstrates the connectivity and appropriateness between items according to constructs. The instrument, which has been certified using EFA and CFA techniques, will assist in measuring the level of sustainability of heritage cities in Malaysia.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download | Instrumen Riset

Copyright Transfer Afreement_Yasid Et Al.

Subject
Type	Instrumen Riset
	Download (617KB) Indexing metadata

Keywords: confirmation factor analysis; exploration factor analysis; heritage city; sustainability index

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Research Articles

Language : ID

In Vol 10, No 3 (2022): December 2022

Recent articles

Penataan Ruang Wilayah Pesisir sebagai Upaya Mitigasi Bencana Tsunami di Pantai Watu Pecak, Kabupaten Lumajang Potensi Serapan Karbon Inorganik pada Kawasan Karst Tropis di Karst Biduk-Biduk, Kalimantan Timur Potensi Penerapan Eco-City untuk Mitigasi Pandemi di Kota-Kota di Indonesia pada Masa Depan More recent articles

Appendino, F. (2017). Balancing heritage conservation and sustainable development–The case of Bordeaux. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245(6), 62002. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062002
Babbie, E. R. (1989). The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing Company
Barton, H., & Grant, M. (2012). Urban planning for healthy cities a review of the progress of the european healthy cities programme. Journal of Urban Health, 90(1). doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
Cho, K. Y., Kusumo, C. M. L., Tan, K. K. H., & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2022). A systematic review of indicators for sustainability of urban heritage sites. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. doi: 10.1108/ARCH-12-2021-0344
Choon, S. W., Chamhuri, S., Pereira, J. J., Jemain, A. A., Hashim, H. S., & Hadi, A. S. (2011). A sustainable city index for Malaysia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18(1), 28–35. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2011.543012
Chua, Y. P. (2014a). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah penyelidikan (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill
Chua, Y. P. (2014b). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan buku 5: Ujian regresi, analisis faktor dan analisis SEM (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill
Daeng Haliza, D. J., & Zuliskandar, R. (2021). Pemuliharaan beberapa bangunan bersejarah di Kelantan: Tinjauan ke atas penglibatan komuniti setempat dalam suai guna semula. Geografia-Malaysian Jurnal of Society and Space, 17(2), 461–474. doi: 10.17576/geo-2021-1702-35
Ghazali, M. K. A., Saleh, Y., & Mahat, H. (2021). Pembinaan kerangka konstruk kelestarian bandar warisan di Malaysia. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 17(1), 211–226. doi: 10.17576/geo-2021-1701-16
Gravagnuolo, A., & Girard, L. F. (2017). Multicriteria tools for the implementation of historic urban landscape. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 21(1). doi: 10.12776/qip.v21i1.792
Habitat III. (2016). New urban agenda. Retrieved from http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/
Hadi, A. S. (2005). Pembandaran lestari: Membina kehidupan di bandar (Syarahan pemikiran Bangi alam sekitar dan pembangunan. Bangi: Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan (LESTARI), UKM
Hair, G., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Halim, U. L., & Tambi, N. (2021). Awareness of community on the conservation of heritage building in George Town, Penang. PLANNING MALAYSIA: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 19(1), 114–126. doi: 10.21837/pm.v19i15.929
Haryati, S., & Nurasyikin, M. (2016). Pembentukan penunjuk dan indeks kualiti hidup bagi mengukur kesejahteraan hidup masyarakat di Pekan Parit Raja. Johor. Batu Pahat: Penerbit Universiti Tun Hussien On Malaysia
Hussin, A. A. (2011). Pemuliharaan dan pemeliharaan warisan di Malaysia. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia
Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa. (2019). Jaringan Penunjuk Pembangunan Mampan Bandar-Luar Bandar Malaysia (MurniNet 2.0). Retrieved from http://murninet.townplan.gov.my/murninetsv2/
Karoglou, M., Kyvelou, S. S., Boukouvalas, C., Theofani, C., Bakolas, A., Krokida, M., & Moropoulou, A. (2019). Towards a preservation-sustainability nexus: Applying LCA to reduce the environmental footprint of modern built heritage. Sustainability, 11(21), 6167. doi: 10.3390/su11216147
Lafond, L. J., & Heritage, Z. (2009). National networks of healthy cities in Europe. Health Promotion International, 24(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap060
Lele, S. W. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. In World Development. Berkeley: University of California
Leus, M., & Verhelst, W. (2018). Sustainability assessment of urban heritage sites. Buildings, 8(8). doi: 10.3390/buildings8080107
Louro, A., Costa, N. M., & Costa, E. M. (2019). Sustainable urban mobility policies as a path to healthy cities-The case study of LMA, Portugal. Sustainable, 11(10). Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390
Marzo-Navarro, M., Pedraja-Iglesias, M., & Vinzón, L. (2015). Sustainability indicators of rural tourism from the perspective of the residents. Tourism Geographies, 17(4), 586–602. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2015.1062909
Mebratu, D. (1988). Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review. Environmetal Impact Assessment Review, 18(6), 493–520. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164–171. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
Naheed, S., & Shooshtarian, S. (2022). The role of cultural heritage in promoting urban sustainability: A brief review. Land, 11(9). doi: 10.3390/land11091508
O’Neill, M., & Simard, P. (2006). Choosing indicators to evaluate healthy cities projects: A political task? Health Promotion International, 21(2), 145–152. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal006
Peterson, J. P. (1997). Indicators of sustainable development in industrializing countries (Lestari monographs). Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Peterson, J. P., Sani, S., & Nordin., M. (1999). Indicators of sustainable development in industrializing countries: Key indicators for tropical cities. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Pham, V. M., Nghiem, S. V, Bui, Q. T., Pham, T. M., & Pham, C. V. (2019). Quantitative assessment of urbanization and impact in the complex of Hue Monuments. Vietnam. Applied Geography, 112(40). doi: https://doi.org/https://agris.fao.org/agrissearch/search.do?recordID=US202000023546
Pinheiro, C., Rozema, L., & Ferreira, A. M. (2020). Sustainable Human Environment: Mouraria, Local Color and Sense of Place of a Historical Lisbon Neighbourhood. In R. Goossens & A. Murata (Eds.), Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 970). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20145-6_13
Poon, S. T. F. (2019). Reimagining the place and placelessness: Heritage symbolism and hospitality architectural designs. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(4), 288–296. doi: 10.1057/s41254-019-00133-7
Rietveld, T., & Hout, R. (1993). Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behavior. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter
Salvatore, C. L. (Ed.). (2018). Cultural heritage care and management: Theory and practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield
Satterthwaite, D. (2001). Sustainable cities or cities that contribute to sustainable development? In Satterthwaite (Ed.), The earthscan reader in sustainable cities (pp. 80–106). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd
Sauve, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-discplinary research. Environment Development, 17, 48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
Schrippe, P., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2019). Preponderant criteria for the definition of corporate sustainability based on Brazilian sustainable companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209(2), 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.001
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons
Skrede, J., & Berg, S. K. (2019). Cultural heritage and sustainable development: The case of urban densification. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 10(1), 83–102. doi: 10.1080/17567505.2019.1558027
Suarez-Eiroa, B., Fernandez, E., Mendez-Martinez, G., & Soto-Onate, D. (2019). Operational principle of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 952–961. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.271
Syed Zainol, A. I. (1992). Pemeliharaan warisan rupa bandar: Panduan mengenali warisan rupa bandar berasaskan inventori bangunan warisan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Badan Warisan Malaysia
Takano, T. (2003a). Development of healthy cities and need for research. In T. Takano (Ed.), Healthy cities and urban policy research (pp. 1–9). London and New York: Spon Press
Takano, T. (Ed.). (2003b). Healthy Cities and Urban Policy Research. London and New York: Spon Press
Tan, S. K., Tan, S. H., Kok, Y. S., & Choon, S. W. (2018). Sense of place and sustainability of intangible cultural heritage – The case of George Town and Melaka. Tourism Management, 67, 376–387. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.012
Tang, H. T., & Lee, Y. M. (2016). The making of sustainable urban development: A synthesis framework. Sustainability, 8(5), 492. doi: 10.3390/su8050492
UNDP. (2019). Sustainable development goal. Retrieved from https://www.my.undp.org/content/malaysia
UNESCO. (2019). World Heritage Convention. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/about/
Unit Perancangan Ekonomi. (2021). Rancangan Malaysia Ke-12 (2021-2025): Malaysia makmur, inklusif, mampan. Kuala Lumpur
United Nation Sustainable Development. (1992). Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, 1–351. Rio De Jenerio, Brazil
United Nations. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
Wang, S., & Gu, K. (2020). Pingyao: The historic urban landscape and planning for heritage-led urban changes. Cities, 97. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102489
WCED. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Wiktor-Mach, D. (2019). Cultural heritage and development: UNESCO’s new paradigm in a changing geopolitical context. Third World Quarterly, 40(9), 1593–1612. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2019.1604131
Zainudin, A., Lim, S. H., & Nur Fairuza, S. Z. (2018). Pendekatan Mudah SEM. Bangi: MPWS Rich Resources Sdn. Bhd
Zuraidah, Z. (2020). Structural equation modeling using AMOS: A step by step approach. Tanjong Malim: Zuraidah Zainol

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

As an article writer, the author has the right to use their articles for various purposes, including use by institutions that employ authors or institutions that provide funding for research. Author rights are granted without special permission.

Author who publishes a paper at JWL has the broad right to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to ask permission, including: used for (i) teaching in the author's class or institution, (ii) presentation at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants ; (iii) training conducted by the author or author's institution; (iv) distribution to colleagues for research use; (v) use in the compilation of subsequent authors' works; (vi) inclusion in a thesis or dissertation; (vi) reuse of part of the article in another work (with citation); (vii) preparation of derivative works (with citation); (viii) voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or author institutions for scientific purposes (follow the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License).

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute material in any media or format, and mix, modify, and build material for any purpose but they must provide appropriate credit (provide article citation or content), providing links to the license, and indicate if there are changes.

The authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan (JWL). Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.

Reproduce any part of this journal, its storage in the database or its transmission by all forms or media is permitted does not need for written permission from JWL. However, it should be cited as an honor in academic manners

JWL and the Department of Urban and Regional Planning of Diponegoro University and the Editor make every effort to ensure that there are no data, opinions, or false or misleading statements published in JWL. However, the content of the article is the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.

The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form - Indonesian] [Copyright Transfer Form - English]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editor in the form of printed letters, scanned documents sent via email or fax.