DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.10.3.246-266

Validasi Instrumen Indeks Kota Berkelanjutan dengan Analisis Faktor

Yasid Saleh  -  Department of Water Resources Management, Budhi Cakra Consultant, Jalan Sukanagara, No. 20 B, Antapani Kidul, Bandung, Bandung City, West Java, Indonesia 40391, Malaysia
Mohamad Khairul Anuar Ghazali  -  Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
Hanifah Mahat  -  Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
Mohmadisa Hashim  -  Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
Nasir Nayan  -  Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
*Suhendro Suhendro  -  Konsultan Budicakra, Bandung, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Creating sustainable cities and communities is one of the key goals in the Sustainable Development Agenda by 2030. To implement this goal, a measurement instrument needs to be developed to assess the extent of sustainability of each city, including heritage cities. Therefore, this study aims to validate the heritage city sustainability index instrument in Malaysia using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmation factor analysis (CFA) methods. The survey form was distributed to 1000 respondents living in 10 heritage cities throughout Malaysia using a simple random sampling technique. For the purpose of item identification and grouping, EFA and CFA analysis were used. The results of the study have formed and accepted five main constructs of heritage city sustainability in Malaysia namely Economic Prosperity (13 items), Social Well -Being (9 items), Environmental Well -Being (8 items), Heritage Culture (9 items) and The Role of Government and Community (18 items). All items in each construct achieved a good Cronbach Alpha value of above 0.70 and met the normality test requirements. The index value conditions set by Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity in this study also showed satisfactory values. The formation of the five constructs of this study directly demonstrates the connectivity and appropriateness between items according to constructs. The instrument, which has been certified using EFA and CFA techniques, will assist in measuring the level of sustainability of heritage cities in Malaysia.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Instrumen Riset
Copyright Transfer Afreement_Yasid Et Al.
Subject
Type Instrumen Riset
  Download (617KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: confirmation factor analysis; exploration factor analysis; heritage city; sustainability index

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Potensi Serapan Karbon Inorganik pada Kawasan Karst Tropis di Karst Biduk-Biduk, Kalimantan Timur Penataan Ruang Wilayah Pesisir sebagai Upaya Mitigasi Bencana Tsunami di Pantai Watu Pecak, Kabupaten Lumajang Validasi Instrumen Indeks Kota Berkelanjutan dengan Analisis Faktor More recent articles
  1. Appendino, F. (2017). Balancing heritage conservation and sustainable development–The case of Bordeaux. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245(6), 62002. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062002
  2. Babbie, E. R. (1989). The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing Company
  3. Barton, H., & Grant, M. (2012). Urban planning for healthy cities a review of the progress of the european healthy cities programme. Journal of Urban Health, 90(1). doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3
  4. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
  5. Cho, K. Y., Kusumo, C. M. L., Tan, K. K. H., & Rasoolimanesh, S. M. (2022). A systematic review of indicators for sustainability of urban heritage sites. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research. doi: 10.1108/ARCH-12-2021-0344
  6. Choon, S. W., Chamhuri, S., Pereira, J. J., Jemain, A. A., Hashim, H. S., & Hadi, A. S. (2011). A sustainable city index for Malaysia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 18(1), 28–35. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2011.543012
  7. Chua, Y. P. (2014a). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah penyelidikan (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill
  8. Chua, Y. P. (2014b). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan buku 5: Ujian regresi, analisis faktor dan analisis SEM (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill
  9. Daeng Haliza, D. J., & Zuliskandar, R. (2021). Pemuliharaan beberapa bangunan bersejarah di Kelantan: Tinjauan ke atas penglibatan komuniti setempat dalam suai guna semula. Geografia-Malaysian Jurnal of Society and Space, 17(2), 461–474. doi: 10.17576/geo-2021-1702-35
  10. Ghazali, M. K. A., Saleh, Y., & Mahat, H. (2021). Pembinaan kerangka konstruk kelestarian bandar warisan di Malaysia. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 17(1), 211–226. doi: 10.17576/geo-2021-1701-16
  11. Gravagnuolo, A., & Girard, L. F. (2017). Multicriteria tools for the implementation of historic urban landscape. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 21(1). doi: 10.12776/qip.v21i1.792
  12. Habitat III. (2016). New urban agenda. Retrieved from http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/
  13. Hadi, A. S. (2005). Pembandaran lestari: Membina kehidupan di bandar (Syarahan pemikiran Bangi alam sekitar dan pembangunan. Bangi: Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan (LESTARI), UKM
  14. Hair, G., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson
  15. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  16. Halim, U. L., & Tambi, N. (2021). Awareness of community on the conservation of heritage building in George Town, Penang. PLANNING MALAYSIA: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 19(1), 114–126. doi: 10.21837/pm.v19i15.929
  17. Haryati, S., & Nurasyikin, M. (2016). Pembentukan penunjuk dan indeks kualiti hidup bagi mengukur kesejahteraan hidup masyarakat di Pekan Parit Raja. Johor. Batu Pahat: Penerbit Universiti Tun Hussien On Malaysia
  18. Hussin, A. A. (2011). Pemuliharaan dan pemeliharaan warisan di Malaysia. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia
  19. Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa. (2019). Jaringan Penunjuk Pembangunan Mampan Bandar-Luar Bandar Malaysia (MurniNet 2.0). Retrieved from http://murninet.townplan.gov.my/murninetsv2/
  20. Karoglou, M., Kyvelou, S. S., Boukouvalas, C., Theofani, C., Bakolas, A., Krokida, M., & Moropoulou, A. (2019). Towards a preservation-sustainability nexus: Applying LCA to reduce the environmental footprint of modern built heritage. Sustainability, 11(21), 6167. doi: 10.3390/su11216147
  21. Lafond, L. J., & Heritage, Z. (2009). National networks of healthy cities in Europe. Health Promotion International, 24(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap060
  22. Lele, S. W. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. In World Development. Berkeley: University of California
  23. Leus, M., & Verhelst, W. (2018). Sustainability assessment of urban heritage sites. Buildings, 8(8). doi: 10.3390/buildings8080107
  24. Louro, A., Costa, N. M., & Costa, E. M. (2019). Sustainable urban mobility policies as a path to healthy cities-The case study of LMA, Portugal. Sustainable, 11(10). Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390
  25. Marzo-Navarro, M., Pedraja-Iglesias, M., & Vinzón, L. (2015). Sustainability indicators of rural tourism from the perspective of the residents. Tourism Geographies, 17(4), 586–602. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2015.1062909
  26. Mebratu, D. (1988). Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review. Environmetal Impact Assessment Review, 18(6), 493–520. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
  27. Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164–171. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
  28. Naheed, S., & Shooshtarian, S. (2022). The role of cultural heritage in promoting urban sustainability: A brief review. Land, 11(9). doi: 10.3390/land11091508
  29. O’Neill, M., & Simard, P. (2006). Choosing indicators to evaluate healthy cities projects: A political task? Health Promotion International, 21(2), 145–152. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal006
  30. Peterson, J. P. (1997). Indicators of sustainable development in industrializing countries (Lestari monographs). Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  31. Peterson, J. P., Sani, S., & Nordin., M. (1999). Indicators of sustainable development in industrializing countries: Key indicators for tropical cities. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  32. Pham, V. M., Nghiem, S. V, Bui, Q. T., Pham, T. M., & Pham, C. V. (2019). Quantitative assessment of urbanization and impact in the complex of Hue Monuments. Vietnam. Applied Geography, 112(40). doi: https://doi.org/https://agris.fao.org/agrissearch/search.do?recordID=US202000023546
  33. Pinheiro, C., Rozema, L., & Ferreira, A. M. (2020). Sustainable Human Environment: Mouraria, Local Color and Sense of Place of a Historical Lisbon Neighbourhood. In R. Goossens & A. Murata (Eds.), Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 970). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20145-6_13
  34. Poon, S. T. F. (2019). Reimagining the place and placelessness: Heritage symbolism and hospitality architectural designs. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(4), 288–296. doi: 10.1057/s41254-019-00133-7
  35. Rietveld, T., & Hout, R. (1993). Statistical techniques for the study of language and language behavior. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter
  36. Salvatore, C. L. (Ed.). (2018). Cultural heritage care and management: Theory and practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield
  37. Satterthwaite, D. (2001). Sustainable cities or cities that contribute to sustainable development? In Satterthwaite (Ed.), The earthscan reader in sustainable cities (pp. 80–106). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd
  38. Sauve, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-discplinary research. Environment Development, 17, 48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
  39. Schrippe, P., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2019). Preponderant criteria for the definition of corporate sustainability based on Brazilian sustainable companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209(2), 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.001
  40. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (5th ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons
  41. Skrede, J., & Berg, S. K. (2019). Cultural heritage and sustainable development: The case of urban densification. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 10(1), 83–102. doi: 10.1080/17567505.2019.1558027
  42. Suarez-Eiroa, B., Fernandez, E., Mendez-Martinez, G., & Soto-Onate, D. (2019). Operational principle of circular economy for sustainable development: Linking theory and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 952–961. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.271
  43. Syed Zainol, A. I. (1992). Pemeliharaan warisan rupa bandar: Panduan mengenali warisan rupa bandar berasaskan inventori bangunan warisan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Badan Warisan Malaysia
  44. Takano, T. (2003a). Development of healthy cities and need for research. In T. Takano (Ed.), Healthy cities and urban policy research (pp. 1–9). London and New York: Spon Press
  45. Takano, T. (Ed.). (2003b). Healthy Cities and Urban Policy Research. London and New York: Spon Press
  46. Tan, S. K., Tan, S. H., Kok, Y. S., & Choon, S. W. (2018). Sense of place and sustainability of intangible cultural heritage – The case of George Town and Melaka. Tourism Management, 67, 376–387. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.012
  47. Tang, H. T., & Lee, Y. M. (2016). The making of sustainable urban development: A synthesis framework. Sustainability, 8(5), 492. doi: 10.3390/su8050492
  48. UNDP. (2019). Sustainable development goal. Retrieved from https://www.my.undp.org/content/malaysia
  49. UNESCO. (2019). World Heritage Convention. Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org/en/about/
  50. Unit Perancangan Ekonomi. (2021). Rancangan Malaysia Ke-12 (2021-2025): Malaysia makmur, inklusif, mampan. Kuala Lumpur
  51. United Nation Sustainable Development. (1992). Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, 1–351. Rio De Jenerio, Brazil
  52. United Nations. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
  53. Wang, S., & Gu, K. (2020). Pingyao: The historic urban landscape and planning for heritage-led urban changes. Cities, 97. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102489
  54. WCED. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  55. Wiktor-Mach, D. (2019). Cultural heritage and development: UNESCO’s new paradigm in a changing geopolitical context. Third World Quarterly, 40(9), 1593–1612. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2019.1604131
  56. Zainudin, A., Lim, S. H., & Nur Fairuza, S. Z. (2018). Pendekatan Mudah SEM. Bangi: MPWS Rich Resources Sdn. Bhd
  57. Zuraidah, Z. (2020). Structural equation modeling using AMOS: A step by step approach. Tanjong Malim: Zuraidah Zainol

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.