DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jwl.10.3.282-296

Potensi Penerapan Eco-City untuk Mitigasi Pandemi di Kota-Kota di Indonesia pada Masa Depan

*Valendya Rilansari  -  Program Studi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Chrisna Trie Hadi Permana  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic that is plagued worldwide, has prompted research from various fields to develop strategies to mitigate similar events in the future. In the context of urban planning, the concept of an Eco-City or ecology-based city is one of the concepts offered by the literature trend that has developed in recent times. This concept discusses the development and arrangement of cities by planning to ensure ecosystem balance. This research aims to do a literature review that systematically discusses the theories and policies of eco-cities implemented in various countries in Asia using a systematic review method. The stages of a systematic review of this research include: a) limiting the scope and definition of the problem with a scopus indexed, b) selection of search results for cities in Asia, and c) screening research based on the citation score and impact factor. In this study, the concept of Eco-City is discussed in relation to the ability of a city to mitigate pandemics that may recur in the future. This study summarizes all findings, facts, and dynamics presented in the literature referenced using Microsoft Excel and Nvivo12. Finally, the findings of this study are discussed in the context of their potential application in Indonesian cities, which are divided into five aspects: social, environmental, economic, infrastructure, and governance.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Potensi Penerapan Eco-City untuk Mitigasi Pandemi Pada Kota-Kota Di Indonesia di Masa Depan
Subject
Type Other
  Download (1MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Eco-City; mitigation pandemic; urban planning; systematic review

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Konsep Pengembangan Desa Wisata Pesisir Tangguh Bencana Berbasis Perencanaan Ruang [Studi Kasus: Desa Kunjir, Kabupaten Lampung Selatan] Kajian Pengelolaan Sampah Perkotaan pada Pulau Kecil Padat Penduduk di Pulau Lengkang, Kota Batam Penataan Ruang Wilayah Pesisir sebagai Upaya Mitigasi Bencana Tsunami di Pantai Watu Pecak, Kabupaten Lumajang More recent articles
  1. Allmond, G. (2017). The First Garden City? Environment and utopianism in an Edwardian institution for the insane poor. Journal of Historical Geography, 56, 101–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2017.03.004
  2. Alreshidi, B. A. (2018). Green business operations for building eco-cities: Identifying the role of business and critical success factors for sustainability. IBIMA Business Review, 2018. doi: 10.5171/2018.592758
  3. Aminullah, E., & Erman, E. (2021). Policy innovation and emergence of innovative health technology: The system dynamics modelling of early COVID-19 handling in Indonesia. Technology in Society, 66, 101682. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101682
  4. Barton, H. (2000). Sustainable communities: The potential for eco-neighbourhoods. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315870649
  5. Basu, T., & Das, A. (2021). Systematic review of how eco-environmental transformation due to urbanization can be investigated in the sustainable development of Indian cities. Environmental Challenges, 4, 100099. doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100099
  6. Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2019). A scholarly backcasting approach to a novel model for smart sustainable cities of the future: Strategic problem orientation. City, Territory and Architecture, 6(1), 3. doi: 10.1186/s40410-019-0102-3
  7. Clerkin, K. J., Fried, J. A., Raikhelkar, J., Sayer, G., Griffin, J. M., Masoumi, A., … Uriel, N. (2020). COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation, 141(20), 1648–1655. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046941
  8. de Leeuw, E., & Simos, J. (2017). Healthy cities: The theory, policy, and practice of value-based urban planning. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6694-3
  9. Deng, W., Cheshmehzangi, A., Ma, Y., & Peng, Z. (2021). Promoting sustainability through governance of eco-city indicators: a multi-spatial perspective. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 16(1), 61–72. doi: 10.1093/ijlct/ctaa038
  10. Dong, E., Du, H., & Gardner, L. (2020). An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(5), 533–534. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1
  11. Friess, D. A. (2017). Singapore as a long-term case study for tropical urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosystems, 20(2), 277–291. doi: 10.1007/s11252-016-0592-7
  12. Geddes, P. (1904). Civics: as Applied Sociology
  13. Hall, P. (2014). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design since 1880 (4th ed.). New Jersey: Willey-Blackwell
  14. Höffken, J. I., & Limmer, A. (2019). Smart and eco-cities in India and China. Local Environment, 24(7), 646–661. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2019.1628730
  15. Hongling, L., Ronald, W., Pingjia, L., Lulu, J., & Wei, D. (2016). Conceptual Sustainability Framework for Eco-City Development in the City Core of Xuzhou. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(4), 5016003. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000319
  16. Howard, E. (1965). Garden Cities of To-Morrow (F. J. Osborn, Ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press
  17. Howard, E. (1989). To-morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform
  18. Ihalawatta, R. K., Kuruppuarachchi, K. A. B. N., & Kulatunga, A. K. (2015). Eco-Friendly, Water Saving Sanitation System. Procedia CIRP, 26, 786–791. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.165
  19. Li, J., Sun, W., Song, H., Li, R., & Hao, J. (2021). Toward the construction of a circular economy eco-city: An emergy-based sustainability evaluation of Rizhao city in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 102956. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102956
  20. Lin, Z. (2018). Ecological urbanism in East Asia: A comparative assessment of two eco-cities in Japan and China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 179, 90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.008
  21. Medved, P., Kim, J. I., & Ursic, M. (2020). The urban social sustainability paradigm in Northeast Asia and Europe. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 8(4), 16–37. doi: 10.14246/irspsd.8.4_16
  22. Pieter van Dijk, M. (2011). Three ecological cities, examples of different approaches in Asia and Europe. In Eco-City Planning. Springer Netherlands. doi: doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0383-4
  23. Rahmanti, A. R., Ningrum, D. N. A., Lazuardi, L., Yang, H.-C., & Li, Y.-C. (2021). Social media data analytics for outbreak risk communication: Public attention on the “new normal” during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 205, 106083. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106083
  24. Randeree, K., & Ahmed, N. (2019). The social imperative in sustainable urban development. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(2), 138–149. doi: 10.1108/SASBE-11-2017-0064
  25. Register, R. (1987). Ecocity Berkeley: Building cities for a healthier future. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books
  26. Saiu, V. (2017). The three pitfalls of sustainable city: A conceptual framework for evaluating the theory-practice gap. Sustainability, Vol. 9. doi: 10.3390/su9122311
  27. Sreeramula, S., & Rahardjo, D. (2021). Estimating COVID-19 Rt in real-time: An Indonesia health policy perspective. Machine Learning with Applications, 6, 100136. doi: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100136
  28. United Nations. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
  29. Welter, V., & Lawson, J. (2000). The city after Patrick Geddes. Bern: Peter Lang Publishing. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=4rplQgAACAAJ
  30. Wong, T. C., & Yuen, B. (2013). Eco city planning: Policies, practice, and design. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 15(3)
  31. Xinkai, W., & Ian, M. (2019). Evaluating the challenges of eco-city development in China: a comparison of Tianjin and Dongtan eco-cities. International Development Planning Review, 41(2), 215–242. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2019.8
  32. Yeo, I.-A., & Lee, E. (2018). Quantitative study on environment and energy information for land use planning scenarios in eco-city planning stage. Applied Energy, 230, 889–911. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.014

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.