skip to main content

The Relationship of Education and Regional Income Level on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from High Populated Country

Fakhri Adrian  -  Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
*Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik orcid scopus publons  -  Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Indonesia is committed to implementing a sustainable development agenda by considering its quality and maintaining economic growth by improving public education and regional income. This study aims to estimate the relationship between education and regional income level with the environmental quality of Indonesian provinces. By applying the descriptive analysis and panel data regression, it is observed that regions with a high-level level of education and income are likely to have low environmental quality, which shows that education level has a negative relationship with environmental quality. In contrast, income level has no relationship with environmental quality. The empirical estimation revealed that higher education and regional income correlate with a lower level of environmental quality. It implied that the regional development in Indonesia has been at the cost of environmental degradation. It advised establishing an incentive and disincentive mechanism for economic actors to utilize energy resources and environmentally friendly production technology and bring the country into a sustainable development direction.
Keywords: education level; environmental quality; generalized least square; income level; Indonesia; panel data regression; sustainable development

Article Metrics:

  1. Ahmed, Z., Asghar, M. M., Malik, M. N., & Nawaz, K. (2020). Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resources Policy, 67(April), 101677.
  2. Baek, J. (2016). A new look at the FDI-income-energy-environment nexus: Dynamic panel data analysis of ASEAN. Energy Policy, 91, 22–27.
  3. Balaguer, J., & Cantavella, M. (2018). The role of education in the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Evidence from Australian data. Energy Economics, 70, 289–296.
  4. Basri, M. C., Rahardja, S., & Fitrania, S. N. (2016). Not a trap, but slow transition? Indonesia's pursuit to high income status. Asian Economic Papers, 15(2), 1–23.
  5. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2013). Single-equation regression models. In Introductory Econometrics: A Practical Approach
  6. Hoang, T. T. P., & Kato, T. (2016). Measuring the effect of environmental education for sustainable development at elementary schools: A case study in Da Nang city, Vietnam. Sustainable Environment Research, 26(6), 274–286.
  7. Hove, S., & Tursoy, T. (2019). An investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve in emerging economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117628.
  8. Kahyaoğlu, M. (2014). The Research of the Relationship between Environmentally Aware Prospective Teachers' Qualities and Self Efficacy Beliefs towards Environmental Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4493–4497.
  9. Kasman, A., & Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis. Economic Modelling, 44, 97–103.
  10. Kroll, C., & Zipperer, V. (2020). Sustainable Development and Populism. Ecological Economics, 176(May), 106723.
  11. Kurniawan, R., & Managi, S. (2018). Economic Growth and Sustainable Development in Indonesia: An Assessment *. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(3), 339–361.
  12. Li, J., Luo, Y., & Wang, S. (2019). Spatial effects of economic performance on the carbon intensity of human well-being: The environmental Kuznets curve in Chinese provinces. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 681–694.
  13. Li, L., Shan, Y., Lei, Y., Wu, S., Yu, X., Lin, X., & Chen, Y. (2019). Decoupling of economic growth and emissions in China's cities: A case study of the Central Plains urban agglomeration. Applied Energy, 244(December 2018), 36–45.
  14. Liang, W., & Yang, M. (2019). Urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution: Evidence from China. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 21, 1–9.
  15. Lima, M. G. B., Kissinger, G., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Braña-Varela, J., & Gupta, A. (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals and REDD+: assessing institutional interactions and the pursuit of synergies. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(4), 589–606.
  16. Lubis, R. F., & Saputra, P. M. A. (2016). the Middle-Income Trap: Is There a Way Out for Asian Countries? Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 29(3), 273–287.
  17. Patole, M. (2018). Localization of SDGs through disaggregation of KPIs. Economies, 6(1).
  18. Rahman, M. M. (2017). Do population density, economic growth, energy use and exports adversely affect environmental quality in Asian populous countries? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77(September 2016), 506–514.
  19. Rahman, M. M., & Vu, X. B. (2020). The nexus between renewable energy, economic growth, trade, urbanization and environmental quality: A comparative study for Australia and Canada. Renewable Energy, 155, 617–627.
  20. Salvia, A. L., Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L. L., & Griebeler, J. S. (2019). Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: local and global issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 841–849.
  21. Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The Private Sector and the SDGs: The Need to Move Beyond' Business as Usual.' Sustainable Development, 24(6), 371–382.
  22. Setyawan, A., Hadijati, M., & Switrayni, N. W. (2019). Analisis Masalah Heteroskedastisitas Menggunakan Generalized Least Square dalam Analisis Regresi. Eigen Mathematics Journal, 1(2), 61.
  23. Sumargo, B. (2018). Comparing Better Environmental Knowledge Based on Education and Income Using the Odds Ratio. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 105–112.
  24. Tianyu, J., & Meng, L. (2020). Does education increase pro-environmental willingness to pay? Evidence from Chinese household survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122713.
  25. Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1565–1578.
  26. Waslekar, S. S. (2014). World Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Global Future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 310–319.
  27. Yao, S., Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2019). Renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: A revised environmental Kuznets Curve perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1338–1352.
  28. Yazdi, S. K., & Dariani, A. G. (2019). CO2 emissions, urbanization and economic growth: evidence from Asian countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32(1), 510–530.
  29. Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., & Qin, Q. (2020). How renewable energy consumption contribute to environmental quality? The role of education in OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122149.
  30. Zhang, C., Wang, Y., Song, X., Kubota, J., He, Y., Tojo, J., & Zhu, X. (2017). An integrated specification for the nexus of water pollution and economic growth in China: Panel cointegration, long-run causality and environmental Kuznets curve. Science of the Total Environment, 609, 319–328.
  31. Zinkernagel, R., Evans, J., & Neij, L. (2018). Applying the SDGs to cities: Business as usual or a new dawn? Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(9).
  32. Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126–138.

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-11-30 07:28:31

No citation recorded.