Persatuan Pranata Laboratorium Pendidikan Universitas Diponegoro.
Unit Pelaksana Teknis (UPT) Laboratorium Terpadu, Universitas Diponegoro
Jl. Prof. Soedarto, S.H. Tembalang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia 50275Phone: +6281321906666Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Download Manuscript Template
Download Perjanjian Pengalihan Hak Cipta
Jurnal Pengelolaan Laboratorium Pendidikan (JPLP, e-ISSN: 2654-251X) adalah jurnal yang bertujuan mewadahi semua hasil karya ilmiah dari: Pengelolaan laboratorium atau studio, Pengelolaan peralatan laboratorium, Pelayanan praktikum, Pelayanan fasilitas laboratorium penelitian, Pengembangan metode dan alat analisis/pengujian, Pengembangan metode dan ketidakpastian pengukuran dan Pengembangan verifikasi dan validasi metode pengukuran
Each manuscript is reviewed by the Editors, and if of a sufficient standard, sent for blinded reviewed by at least two Editorial Board members who come from a range of countries as chosen by the journal team based on their expertise (double-blind peer review). The result may be accepted with no correction, accepted with little correction, accepted with many corrections and refused. The sending author is given opportunity to correct the article on the basis of suggestion received from the reviewer. Certain information of whether the article is accepted and published or refused is given to the sending author in written.
Jurnal Pengelolaan Laboratorium Pendidikan terbit dua nomor terbitan per tahun pada bulan Januari dan Juli.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Jurnal Pengelolaan Laboratorium Pendidikan (JPLP) e-ISSN: 2654-251X (ISSN 1411-8254) is a peer-reviewed journal published by union of educational laboratory institutions, Diponegoro University. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JIS journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.
union of educational laboratory institutions (PPLP), Diponegoro University as publisher of JPLP journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenuehas no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of Social and Political Science Diponegoro University and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful andnecessary.
The editor of the JPLP journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
You can publish in Jurnal Pengelolaan Laboratorium Pendidikan (JPLP)Author whose is accepted for publication is subjected to pay IDR 400,000 per article.
Please confirm if you have processed the payment to Mrs. Irma Dewi Novita (+62 8139156 5782)
Author should first register as Author and/or is offered as Reviewer through the following address: https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/jplp/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
Author should fulfill the form as detailed as possible where the star marked form must be entered. After all form of textbox was filled, Author clicks on “Register” button to proceed the registration. Therefore, Author is brought to online author submission interface where Author should click on “New Submission”. In the Start of a New Submission section, click on “’Click Here’: to go to step one of the five-step submission process”. The following are five steps in online submission process:
After this submission, Authors who submit the manuscript will get a confirmation email about the submission. Therefore, Authors are able to track their submission status at any time by logging in to the online submission interface. The submission tracking includes the status of manuscript review and editorial process.
Jurnal Pengelolaan Laboratorium Pendidikan (JPLP, e-ISSN: 2654-251X) diterbitkan oleh Persatuan Pranata Laboratorium Pendidikan Universitas Diponegoro.Unit Pelaksana Teknis (UPT) Laboratorium Terpadu, Universitas Diponegoro Jl. Prof. Soedarto, S.H. Tembalang, Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia 50275Phone: +6281321906666Email: email@example.com View statistics