DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpii.2026.32341

Analisis Pemilihan Pompa Menggunakan Computational Fluid Dynamic dan Multi-Criteria Rating Index

*Deka Setyawan  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Agus Suprihanto  -  Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, Indonesia
Received: 12 Mar 2026; Revised: 10 Apr 2026; Accepted: 15 Apr 2026; Available online: 18 Apr 2026; Published: 8 Sep 2026.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Keandalan dan efisiensi pompa pada sistem penyediaan bahan bakar merupakan hal yang sangat krusial bagi operasional pertambangan. Downtime yang mengakibatkan terhambatnya aliran bahan bakar akan menyebabkan kerugian operasional yang sangat besar. Salah satu strategi dalam mengatasi permasalahan tersebut adalah penyediaan pompa yang andal, efisien dan sesuai dengan kondisi kerja yang dibutuhkan. Pemilihan pompa yang salah akan menyebabkan rendahnya laju aliran, kavitasi, overheating, kegagalan sistem, pencemaran dan kecelakaan kerja. Selain dari performa teknis dan keandalan, aspek harga, ketersediaan part, serta aspek lingkungan merupakan hal yang tidak kalah penting. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan melakukan analisis pemilihan pompa pada tiga produk pompa menggunakan computational fluid dynamic dan multi-criteria rating index. Nilai head terbesar pada hasil CFD adalah 21,752 m, debit sebesar 0,435 m3/minutes dan efisiensi sebesar 77% terjadi pada pompa A. Sedangkan hasil dari proses analisis multi-criteria rating index menyatakan bahwa pompa A memiliki nilai rating terbesar dengan nilai 0,96 dibandingkan dua produk pompa lainnya.

 

Kata kunci: bahan bakar, pompa, downtime, computational fluid dynamic, multi-criteria rating index

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
  1. Aliuly, A., Amanzholov, T., Seitov, A., Momysh, N., Jaichibekov, N., & Kaltayev, A. (2024). Hydraulic design and CFD-Based parametric study for optimizing centrifugal pump impeller performance. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10161. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210161
  2. Al-Obaidi, A. R. (2024). Evaluation and investigation of hydraulic performance characteristics in an axial pump based on CFD and acoustic analysis. Processes, 12(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12010129
  3. Anqi, A. E., & Mohammed, A. A. (2021). Evaluating critical influencing factors of desalination by membrane distillation process—using multi-criteria decision-making. Membranes, 11(3), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030164
  4. Anuar, A., Undavalli, V. K., Khandelwal, B., & Blakey, S. J. T. A. J. (2021). Effect of fuels, aromatics and preparation methods on seal swell. The Aeronautical Journal, 125(1291), 1542-1565. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2021.25
  5. Cao, D. N., Hoang, A. T., Luu, H. Q., Bui, V. G., & Tran, T. T. H. (2024). Effects of injection pressure on the NOx and PM emission control of diesel engine: A review under the aspect of PCCI combustion condition. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 46(1), 7414-7431. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1754531
  6. Daneshparvar, M. R., & Beigzadeh, R. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of helical baffles in the shell-and-tube heat exchanger by computational fluid dynamics and genetic algorithm. Energy Reports, 8, 11064-11077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.249
  7. Ge, T., Hu, L., Su, R., & Ruan, X. (2023). Analysis of cavitation and shear in bellows pump: transient CFD modelling and high-speed visualization. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 17(1), 2247474. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2023.2247474
  8. Hassan Aly Hassan, M., Ahmed ElSherif, I., A. El-latif, M., M. Shaheen, M., S. Elmesalamy, A., & Mahmoud, H. (2025). A comprehensive review of numerical simulation techniques for wind turbines: from computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis to advanced turbulence modeling. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-025-00680-4
  9. He, G., Zhang, J., Shah, A., Berk, Z. B., Han, L., Dong, H., ... & Wu, Z. J. (2021). Flow characteristics and hemolytic performance of the new Breethe centrifugal blood pump in comparison with the CentriMag and Rotaflow pumps. The International journal of artificial organs, 44(11), 829-837. https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988211041635
  10. Koprivica, S., Ivanišević, A., Stefanović, D., Jovin, M., & Petrović, M. (2025). Balancing Efficiency and Sustainability: Multicriteria Decision-Making for Pumping Station Upgrades. Sustainability, 17(7), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072818
  11. Li, Q., Shen, X., Guo, S., Li, M., & Zou, Z. (2021). Computational investigation on effect of impeller dimension on fluid flow and interface behavior for kanbara reactor hot metal treatment. steel research international, 92(11), 2100239. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.202100239
  12. Li, Y., Liu, D., Cui, B., Lin, Z., Zheng, Y., & Ishnazarov, O. (2024). Studying particle transport characteristics in centrifugal pumps under external vibration using CFD-DEM simulation. Ocean Engineering, 301, 117538
  13. Lipej, A. (2022). Challenges in the numerical analysis of centrifugal pumps: energetic, cavitation and dynamic characteristics. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 12(1), 8217-8222
  14. Liu, M., Tan, L., & Cao, S. (2022). Performance prediction and geometry optimization for application of pump as turbine: a review. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 818118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.818118
  15. Lyu, H. M., Shen, S. L., Wu, Y. X., & Zhou, A. N. (2021). Calculation of groundwater head distribution with a close barrier during excavation dewatering in confined aquifer. Geoscience Frontiers, 12(2), 791-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.002
  16. Mao, R., Lan, Y., Liang, L., Yu, T., Mu, M., Leng, W., & Long, Z. (2025). Rapid CFD prediction based on machine learning surrogate model in built environment: A review. Fluids, 10(8), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids10080193
  17. Omar, A. B. M., Ayman, O. M., Nabil, T., & Mansour, T. M. (2024). Torsional vibration control in diesel engine-driven centrifugal pump: Validation through experimental results. Results in Engineering, 24, 103549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103549
  18. Osipov, V., Posadskii, A., & Sivakova, T. (2019, November). Methods of rational decision making in multi-agent systems for evaluating the effectiveness of innovations. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2181, No. 1, p. 020031). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5135691
  19. Qasem, A. (2025). Performance Assessment Model for Petrol Stations Using a Multi-Criteria Condition Rating Index. Sustainability, 17(6), 2355. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062355
  20. Rubio-Aliaga, A., García-Cascales, M. S., Sánchez-Lozano, J. M., & Molina-Garcia, A. (2021). MCDM-based multidimensional approach for selection of optimal groundwater pumping systems: Design and case example. Renewable Energy, 163, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.079
  21. Sánchez-Ferrer, D. S., Briceño-León, C. X., Iglesias-Rey, P. L., Martínez-Solano, F. J., & Fuertes-Miquel, V. S. (2021). Design of pumping stations using a multicriteria analysis and the application of the AHP method. Sustainability, 13(11), 5876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115876
  22. Shah, M., Baloni, B., & Channiwala, S. (2022). Optimization of centrifugal pump based on impeller-volute interactions. Advances in Technology Innovation, 7(3), 216. https://doi.org/10.46604/aiti.2022.8509
  23. Tominaga, Y. (2024). CFD simulations of turbulent flow and dispersion in built environment: A perspective review. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 249, 105741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105741
  24. Tusar, M. I. H., & Sarker, B. R. (2022). Spare parts control strategies for offshore wind farms: A critical review and comparative study. Wind Engineering, 46(5), 1629-1656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309524X221095258
  25. Wang, S., Zhang, L., Yin, G., Chen, J., & Wang, L. (2021). Vibration analysis of the steel shell flow tube in a vertical axial pumping station based on fluid-structure interaction (FSI) method. Sādhanā, 46(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-
  26. Wang, W., & Li, Z. (2021). Influence of different types of volutes on centrifugal aviation fuel pump. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 13(3), 16878140211005202. https://doi.org/10.1177/16878140211005202
  27. Yi, H., Kim, M., Lee, D., & Park, J. (2022). Applications of computational fluid dynamics for mine ventilation in mineral development. Energies, 15(22), 8405. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228405

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.