DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v6i2.260-280

Limitasi Demokrasi Hak Presiden dalam Kampanye Politik Sebagai Penguatan Sistem Pemilihan Umum

*Muhammad Mutawalli Mukhlis orcid scopus  -  Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Bisnis Islam, Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene, Indonesia
Piaget Mpoto Balebo orcid  -  Centre de Recherche en Sciences Humaines, International Relations, Université de Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Andi Syarifuddin  -  Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia
Muhammad Saleh Tajuddin scopus  -  Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract
Lintas demokrasi dan sistem pemilu mengacu pada berbagai jenis demokrasi dan sistem pemilihan yang digunakan di berbagai negara di seluruh dunia. Penelitian membahas limitasi hak presiden dan kewenangannya serta dampaknya dalam proses pemilu dalam rangka penguatan sistem pemilu. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa limitasi hak presiden dalam kampanye politik sebagai penguatan system pemilihan umum ialah presiden harus tetap berlaku netral, tidak menggunakan anggaran negara, tidak boleh secara aktif terlibat dalam kampanye politik kandidat tertentu, serta presiden harus berhati-hati agar kebijakan pemerintah tidak dimanfaatkan untuk keuntungan politik. Sementara dampak yang ditimbulkan dari limitasi tersebut dapat mengurangi risiko penyalahgunaan kewenangan, meningkatkan keadilan kompetisi, memperkuat akuntabilitas, menjamin transparansi, serta menjamin keseimbangan kekuasaan.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Demokrasi; Kampanye; Pemilihan Umum; Presiden

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Hambatan Regulasi Dan Teknis Terkait Implementasi Cyber Notary Di Indonesia Kebebasan Pers, Tanggung Jawab dan Etika Jurnalistik dalam Lingkungan Media Online yang Kompetitif Kejahatan Biodiversitas dan Urgensi Peran Hukum Pidana dalam Sektor Agraria More recent articles
  1. Abdurrahman, Dana Muhamad Bagas., & Fauzi, Azka Patria. (2022). Penyalahgunaan Wewenang (Abuse of Power) Presiden dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Berdasarkan Perspektif Sovereign Immunity. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, Vol.1,(No.12),pp. 2999–3006. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i12.488
  2. Ahsan, Fikri., Andrianto, Wahyu., Andaru, Djarot Dimas Achmad., & Hanapi, Mohamad. (2023). The Postponed Regional Head Elections in Emergency Situations: a Constitutional Democracy Perspective in Indonesia. Yustisia, Vol.12, (No.2), pp.202–218. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v12i2. 64638
  3. Tovar, Jorge Arturo Á. (2013). Why Has The Transition to Democracy Led the Mexican Presidential System to Political Instability? A Proposal to Enhance Institutional Arrangements. Mexican Law Review, Vol.5, (No.2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1870-0578 (16)30026-9
  4. Benuf, Kornelius., Mahmudah, Siti., & Priyono, Ery Agus. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Keamanan Data Konsumen Financial Technology Di Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.3, (No.2),pp.145–160. https://doi.org/10.24246/ jrh.2019.v3.i2.p145-160
  5. Cameron, Sarah., & McAllister, Ian. (2024). The Decline of Political Leader Popularity: Partisan Dealignment and Leader Integrity in Australia. Electoral Studies, Vol.87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102739
  6. Castro, Fransisca., & Retamal, Renata. (2024). Does Electoral Behavior Change After a Protest Cycle? Evidence from Chile and Bolivia. Electoral Studies, Vol.89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102777
  7. Child, Travers Barclay., Massoud, Nadia., Schabus, Mario., & Zhou, Yifan. (2021). Surprise Election for Trump Connections. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.140, (No.2),pp.676–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.004
  8. Clayman, Steven E., & Heritage, John. (2023). Pressuring the President: Changing Language Practices and The Growth of Political Accountability. Journal of Pragmatics,Vol.207,pp.62–74. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.014
  9. de Boer, Jantke., Eichler, Stefan., & Roevekamp, Ingmar. (2022). Protectionism, Bilateral Integration, and The Cross Section of Exchange Rate Returns in Us Presidential Debates. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4263882
  10. Dentler, Klara., Blinzler, Katharina., & Quinlan, Stephen. (2024). Electoral Messiah or Party Label? Quantifying and Investigating Leader-Party Relationships in German Federal Elections 1998–2021. Electoral Studies,Vol.87. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.electstud.2023.102699
  11. Dollbaum, Jan M. (2017). Curbing Protest Through Elite Co-Optation? Regional Protest Mobilization by The Russian Systemic Opposition during The ‘For Fair Elections’ Protests 2011–2012. Journal of Eurasian Studies, Vol.8, (No.2), pp.109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2017.01.002
  12. Pavlović, D. (2019). Prospect theory and presidential elections: Two cases from Yugoslavia and Serbia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol.52, (No.1), pp.11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcom stud.2019.01.002
  13. Fiarni, Cut., Maharani, Herastia., & Kirsten, Ivan Nathaniel. (2024). Electoral Recommender System for Indonesian Regional People’s Representative Councils (DPRD) Using Knowledge-Based and Collaborative Filtering Approach. Procedia Computer Science,Vol.234,pp.28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.02.149
  14. Golob, A. (2024). Nicaragua’s New Dictatorship: Impacts of Authoritarian Rule on The Health Sector and Civil Society. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, Vol.9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100878
  15. Gowhary, Habib., Rahimi, Farahnaz., Azizifar, Akbar., & Jamalinesari, Ali. (2015). A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Electoral Talks of Iranian Presidential Candidates in 2013. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.192,pp.132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.020
  16. Hoeft, Leonard., & Mill, Wladislaw. (2024). Abuse of power: An experimental investigation of the effects of power and transparency on centralized punishment. Ournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol.220, pp.305–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.003
  17. Igersheim, Herrade., Durand, Francois., Hamlin, Aaron., & Laslier, Jean Francois. (2022). Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol.71. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102057
  18. Jalil, Zakaria., Rusli, Zulfadhli., & Malini, Ulfa. (2022). Peran Badan Usaha Milik Gampong Dalam Meningkatkan Pendapatan Masyarakat. Jurnal Economica Didactica, Vol.3,(No.2),pp.39–43. https://doi.org/10.17529/jed.v3i2.30292
  19. Juanda, Ogiandhafiz., & Juanda. (2023). Peran dan Fungsi Partai Politik Dalam Mewujudkan Pemilu Yang Berkualitas dan Bermartabat Tahun 2024. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin, Vol.2, (No.2), pp.140–147. https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v2i2.249
  20. Ko, Hyein., Jackson, Natalie., Osborn, Tracy., & Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (2024). Forecasting Presidential Elections: Accuracy of ANES Voter Intentions. International Journal of Forecasting (In Press). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.03.003
  21. Kristiyanto, Hasto., Arinanto, Satya., & Ghafur, Hanief Saha. (2023). Institutionalization and Party Resilience in Indonesian Electoral Democracy. Heliyon, Vol.9, (No.12). https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22919
  22. Miller, Jon D., Woods, Logan T., & Kalmbach, Jason. (2022). The Impact of The Covid-19 Pandemic in a Polarized Political System: Lessons from The 2020 Election. Electoral Studies,Vol.80. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.electstud.2022.102548
  23. Mueller-Hirth, Natascha., Vertigans, Stephen., & Gibson, Neil. (2023). Women’s Gendered Experiences of Political Instability: Kibera During The 2017 Kenyan Elections. Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol.96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102668
  24. Mukhlis, Muhammad Mutawalli., Ruslan, Achamd., Wahid, A. M. Yunus., Ilyas, Anshori., & Wahab, Harlida Abdul. (2024). Ius Constituendum Regulates the Cadre-Based Recruitment of Candidates for Members of the House of Representatives Through Political Parties. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, Vol.7,(No.1),pp.139–155. https://doi.org/10. 24090/volksgeist. v7i1.10830
  25. Nurkhalis. (2012). Konstruksi Teori Paradigma Thomas S. Kuhn. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura,Vol.11,(No.2),pp.79–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v11i2.55
  26. Rannie, Mahesa., Saraswati, Retno., & Wisnaeni, Fifiana. (2024). Does the Reform of the Parliamentary and Presidential Threshold Strengthen the Presidential System in Indonesia? Sriwijaya Law Review, Vol.8,(No.1),pp.13–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.3157. pp133-151
  27. Rotering, Thomas., Bialous, Stella., & Apollonio, Dorie. (2023). Cannabis Industry Campaign Expenditures in Colorado, 2005-2021. International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol.119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104156
  28. Šaradín, Pavel., Lebeda, Tomas., Lysek, Jakub., Soukop, Michal., Ostrá, Daniela., & Lebedová, Eva. (2021). Post-Election Survey Data: Local Democracy and The 2018 Local Elections in The Czech Republic. Data in Brief, Vol.36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107039
  29. Sirajuddin., Ramadhan, Febriansyah., & Rafiqi, Ilham Dwi. (2021). Urgensi Pemisahan Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Serentak Nasional dan Lokal. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, Vol.4,(No.2),pp.233–247. https://doi.org/10. 24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5224
  30. Sitompul, Muhammad S. (2016). Harmonisasi Pengaturan Tentang Kewenangan Dalam Penerbitan Surat Persetujuan Berlayar (Spb) Kapal Ikan Di Pelabuhan Belawan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pelayaran Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 45 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perikanan. Jurnal Mercatoria, Vol.9,(No.2),pp.136–153. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v9i2.436
  31. Tang, Wen-hui Anna., & Teng, Emma J. (2016). Looking Again at Taiwan’s Lü Hsiu-lien: A Female Vice President or a Feminist Vice President? Women’s Studies International Forum,Vol.56,pp.92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.01.006
  32. Tanzil, D. (2021). Peninjauan electoral Justice sebagai Upaya dalam Mewujudkan Pemilu 2024 yang Berkeadilan. Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau, Vol.3, (No.1), pp.38–57. https://doi.org/10.55108/jbk. v3i2.256
  33. Tarverdi, Yashar., Saha, Shabrani., & Campbell, Neil. (2019). Governance, democracy and development. Economic Analysis and Policy,Vol.63,pp.220–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2019.06.005
  34. Thalhah, HM. (2009). Teori demokrasi dalam wacana ketatanegaraan perspektif pemikiran Hans Kelsen. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol.16, (No.3), pp.413–422. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss3.art6
  35. Wisse, Barbara., & Sleebos, Ed. (2016). When the dark ones gain power: Perceived position power strengthens the effect of supervisor Machiavellianism on abusive supervision in work teams. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol.99, pp.122–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.019
  36. Yan, Huang-Ting. (2017). Comparing democratic performance of semi-presidential regimes in the post-communist region: Omnipotent presidents and media control. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol.50 (No.4), pp.263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.post comstud.2017.09.003
  37. Yusifov, F. (2018). Weighted Voting as a New Tool of Democratic Elections. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol.51, (No.30), pp.118–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.259
  38. UUD NRI. (1945). Pasal 1 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 yang mendefinisikan Indonesia sebagai negara kesatuan yang terbentuk dalam Republik
  39. Asshiddiqie, J. (2014). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press (Konpress)
  40. Bachtiar. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Pamulang: Unpam Press
  41. Burlian, P. (2015). Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. UIN Raden Fatah, Palembang
  42. Cangara, H. (2011). Komunikasi Politik Konsep, Teori dan Strategi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
  43. Chaniago, A. (2017). Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan. Jakarta: Lentera Ilmu Cendekia
  44. Dahl, Robert A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Heaven: Yale University Press
  45. Hadiwijoyo, Suryo S. (2012). Perencanaan Pariwisata Perdesaan Berbasis Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu
  46. Hapsari, Sri., & Heryani, Rosalina Dewi. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Unindra Press
  47. Labolo, Muhadam., & Ilham, Teguh. (2017). Partai Politik dan Sistem Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia: Teori, Konsep dan Isu Strategis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  48. MD, Mahfud. (2020). Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres
  49. Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat RI. (2018). Badan Pengkajian 2018. Jakarta: Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia
  50. Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat Baron de. (1748). The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  51. Northouse, Peter G. (2017). Leadership: Theory and Practice. CA: SAGE Publications
  52. Rowa, H. (2015). Demokrasi dan Kebangsaan Indonesia. Sumedang: Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  53. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
  54. Suparman, M. (2014). Politik Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta: Erlangga
  55. Wijayanti, Septi Nur., & Prasetyoningsih, Nanik. (2019). Buku ajar perkembangan politik ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  56. Fahmi, K. (2024). Presiden Kampanye, Ada Potensi Penyelundupan Hukum. Retrieved from https://www.unand.ac.id/index.php/ berita/opini/801-opini-htn-unand-opini.html

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.