DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jekk.v6i2.10660

Mixed Methods Systematic Review : Kejadian Cabin Fever Selama Pembatasan Sosial Saat Penyebaran Penyakit Sars, Mers Dan Covid-19

*Michelle Christo  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Lintang Dian Saraswati  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Ari Udiyono  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Dwi Sutiningsih  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: SARS, MERS and Covid-19 are the most dangerous viruses among the Human Coronavirus (HCoV). The spreading of those diseases could cause cabin fever due to social restrictions as the control and prevention efforts. This study aims to map the impact of cabin fever during HCoV pandemic by the characteristic population and its causing factors.

Methods: A mixed method systematic review was conducted in five databases and its keywords were determined using MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). All articles were assessed after passed the last process (included). There are 11 articles included and 3 of them rated as strong quality. The findings were grouped into themes related to population characteristics and causative factors.

Result: The result shows among 4 themes of population characteristic, college student shows more than five symptoms of cabin fever. Out of all the causing factors, quarantine and social distancing shows more than five symptoms of cabin fever.

Conclusion: This review proves that cabin fever can occurs during the outbreak, epidemics and pandemics so, psychological treatment in the communities is needed during the spreading of the viruses. The treatment must be right because the symptoms of cabin fever differ according to population and the causes.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Cabin Fever; Psychological Impact; Human Coronavirus; Systematic Review

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Tempoyak Sebagai Faktor Risiko Kejadian Hipertensi (Studi pada Masyarakat Suku Dayak di Wilayah Puskesmas Tumbang Samba, Kabupaten Katingan, Kalimantan Tengah) Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) of Mini circle DNA Transfection (McD) is Encapsulated by Gold Nanoparticles from Folate’s Receptors of Gold Conjugation as Curative Therapy for Non-Small’s Cell of Lung Cancer Hubungan Tingkat pengetahuan dan Sikap dengan Praktik Pencegahan COVID-19 pada Masyarakat Pengguna Internet di Kota Semarang More recent articles
  1. Afshar Z, Ebrahimpour S, Javanian M, Koppolu V, Vasigala VR, Hasanpour A, et al. 2020. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), MERS and SARS: Similarity and Difference. J Acute Dis.9(5):194–9
  2. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Weekly Epidemiological Updated 27 December 2020. 2020;1–17
  3. World Health Organization. MERS Situation Update January 2020. 2020
  4. World Health Organization. Update 95 - SARS : Chronology of a serial killer. 2003
  5. Jefferson T, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, Ferroni E, Al-Ansary LA, Bawazeer GA, et al. 2011. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane database Syst Rev. (7)
  6. Jeong H, Yim HW, Song YJ, Ki M, Min JA, Cho J, et al. 2016. Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Epidemiol Health. 38:1–7
  7. Hawryluck L, Gold WL, Robinson S, Pogorski S, Galea S, Styra R. 2004. SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 10(7):1206–12
  8. Petrosillo N, Viceconte G, Ergonul O, Ippolito G, Petersen E. 2020. COVID-19, SARS and MERS: are they closely related? Clin Microbiol Infect. 26:729–34
  9. Liu Y, Gayle AA, Wilder-Smith A, Rocklöv J. 2020. The Reproductive Number of COVID-19 is Higher Compared to SARS Coronavirus. J Travel Med. 27(2):1–4
  10. Rosenblatt PC, Anderson RM, Johnson PA. 1984. The meaning of “cabin fever.” J Soc Psychol. 123(1):43–53
  11. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical description and diagnostic guidelines. 10th ed. Vol. 2. World Health Organization; 1993
  12. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. 2020. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 1–9
  13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ. 339(7716):332–6
  14. Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020
  15. Audate PP, Fernandez MA, Cloutier G, Lebel A. 2019. Scoping review of the impacts of urban agriculture on the determinants of health. BMC Public Health. 19(1):1–14
  16. Wallace A, Croucher K, Quilgars D, Baldwin S. 2004. Meeting the challenge: Developing systematic reviewing in social policy. Policy Polit. 32(4):455–70
  17. Ohly H, Gentry S, Wigglesworth R, Bethel A, Lovell R, Garside R. 2016. A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening: Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence. BMC Public Health. 16(286):1–36
  18. Al-rabiaah A, Temsah M, Al-eyadhy AA. 2020. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus (MERS-CoV) associated stress among medical students at a university teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 13
  19. Parlapani E, Holeva V, Nikopoulou VA, Sereslis K, Athanasiadou M, Godosidis A, et al. 2020. Intolerance of Uncertainty and Loneliness in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychiatry. 11:1–12
  20. Forte G, Favieri F, Tambelli R, Casagrande M. 2020. The Enemy Which Sealed the World: Effects of COVID-19 Diffusion on the Psychological State of the Italian Population. J Clin Med. 9(6):1802
  21. Lee SM, Sub Kang W, Cho A-R, Kim T, Park JK. 2018. Psychological impact of 2015 MERS outbreak on hospital workers and quarantined hemodialysis patients. Compr Psychiatry. 87:123–7
  22. Si M, Su X, Jiang Y, Wang W, Gu X, Ma L, et al. 2020. Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Medical Care Workers in China. Infect Dis Poverty. 9(113):1–13
  23. Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, Bennett J, Peladeau N, Leszcz M, et al. 2003. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. Cmaj. 168(10):1245–51
  24. Chen D, Song F, Tang L, Zhang H, Shao J, Qiu R, et al. 2020. Quarantine experience of close contacts of COVID-19 patients in China: A qualitative descriptive study Dandan. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 66:81–8
  25. Landis MS, Bradley JW, Chan L, Ahmad Y, Klevan AE, Zahirieh A, et al. 2005. The Impact of the 2003 SARS Outbreak on Medical Students at the University of Toronto. Univ Toronto Med J. 82(3):158–64
  26. Reynolds DL, Garay JR, Deamond SL, Moran MK, Gold W, Styra R. 2007. Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience. Epidemiol Infect. 136:997–1007
  27. Şenışık S, Denerel N, Köyağasıoğlu O, Tunç S. 2020. The effect of isolation on athletes’ mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Phys Sportsmed. 1–7
  28. Tull MT, Edmonds KA, Scamaldo KM, Richmond JR, Rose JP, Gratz KL. 2020. Psychological Outcomes Associated with Stay-at-Home Orders and the Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Daily Life. Psychiatry Res. 289:1–6
  29. Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, et al. 2020. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 287:1–5
  30. Li T, Liu Y, Li M, Qian X, Dai SY. 2020. Mask or no mask for COVID-19: A public health and market study. PLoS One. 15(8):1–17

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update:

No citation recorded.